Upfront submandibular salivary gland transfer in pharyngeal cancers.

Head and neck irradiation results in salivary dysfunction and subsequent xerostomia. Twenty two patients with squamous cancer of oropharynx or hypopharynx underwent contralateral submandibular salivary gland transfer (SMSGT) to submental triangle to shield it from subsequent radiotherapy. Resting salivary outputs of transferred and untransferred gland (control) were measured before and after SMSGT and following radiotherapy, by cannulating individual submandibular duct. They were compared by paired samples t-test. Following radiation therapy transferred gland retained 73% and untransferred gland (control) retained 27% of baseline salivary output. This significant difference in post-radiation salivary outputs suggests preservation of function of transferred salivary gland.

Radical radiation vs surgery plus post-operative radiation in advanced (resectable) supraglottic larynx and pyriform sinus cancers: a prospective randomized study.

AIM: Survival in head and neck cancers reflect loco-regional control. With an aim of organ and function preservation the present study was undertaken to compare local failure and survivals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between August 1991-December 1995, 72 patients with resectable advanced supraglottic cancers, were randomized to radical surgery followed by post-operative radiation therapy (Sx+PORT) (Arm I) or radical radiation therapy followed by salvage surgery (RRT+/-SSx) (Arm II). RESULTS: Sixty-four of 72 patients were evaluable, 55 were T3 (86%) and 9 were T4 (14%) tumors. In Arm I (n=35) with a mean follow-up of 24 months (2-86 months), 21 patients were alive without disease. Six patients had recurrence, one each at local and tracheostomy stoma, four had nodal recurrence only, and two developed 2nd primary in soft palate/tonsil and parotid at 15 and 18 months respectively. In Arm II (n=29), with a mean follow-up of 24 months (3-81 months), 14 patients were alive without disease. Thirteen patients had recurrence, eight had local (one patient had persistent disease), two nodal only, three loco-regional and two patients developed distant metastasis (lung). One out of eight local recurrence and 2/2 nodal recurrences were salvaged with Sx. There was a significant difference in disease-free survival between the two treatment arms, DFS (5 years) of 70% in Arm I vs 50% in Arm II (p=0.04), but did not have any impact on overall survival OAS (5 years); 73% vs 77% (p=0.79). Voice/laryngeal preservation was possible in 18/29 patients (62%) treated with RRT+/- Sx, without significantly affecting the OAS. "Pathological upstaging" was another significant finding seen in 64% of clinical T3 after radical surgery. CONCLUSION: RRT+/-SSx can be a feasible option in low volume, favourable resectable stage III and IV supraglottic lesions for better quality of life.

Interstitial brachytherapy in carcinoma of the penis.

AIM: Keeping in line with the increasing emphasis on organ preservation, we at the Tata Memorial Hospital have evaluated the role of Ir-192 interstitial implant as regards local control, functional and cosmetic outcome in early as well as locally recurrent carcinoma of the distal penis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1988 to December 1996, 23 patients with histopathologically proven cancer of the penis were treated with radical radiation therapy using Ir-192 temporary interstitial implant. Our patients were in the age group of 20 to 60 years. The primary lesions were T1 in 7, T2 in 7 and recurrent in 9 patients. Only 7 patients had palpable groin nodes at presentation, all of which were pathologically negative. The median dose of implant was 50 Gy (range 40 to 60 Gy), using the LDR afterloading system and the Paris system of implant rules for dosimetry. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 117 months (median 24 months). RESULTS: At last follow-up 18 of the 23 patients remained locally controlled with implant alone. Three patients failed only locally, 2 locoregionally and 1 only at the groin. Of the 5 patients who failed locally, 4 were successfully salvaged with partial penectomy and remained controlled when last seen. Local control with implant alone at 8 years was 70% by life table analysis. The patients had excellent functional and cosmetic outcome. We did not record any case of skin or soft-tissue necrosis. Only 2 patients developed meatal stenosis, both of which were treated endoscopically. CONCLUSION: Our results lead us to interpret that interstitial brachytherapy with Ir-192 offers excellent local control rates with preservation of organ and function. Penectomy can be reserved as a means for effective salvage.

Radiotherapy of carcinoma of the buccal mucosa.

A retrospective study of 399 cases of buccal cancer, presenting to the Tata Memorial Hospital, Bombay, during January to December 1984 was undertaken to define the efficacy of various treatment modalities in different clinical stages. Analysis of treatment technique and response was carried out in 185 cases that completed adequate therapy. Sixty percent of patients with stage I and II disease (21/35) received radiation therapy alone as the primary modality of treatment. Patients (150) with stage III or IV disease received palliative irradiation (57 cases), radical surgery (54 cases), or a combination of both (39 cases). The 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 48% for radiotherapy and 46% for surgery in the early stages and 5% and 33%, respectively, for advanced stages. Radiotherapy with a modified technique is recommended for the early-stage cancers and preoperative irradiation with adjuvant chemotherapy or hyperthermia for the advanced stages.