Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 22(5): 441-448, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36507808

ABSTRACT

Although seemingly benign, the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) may play an important role in the pathophysiology of disease, specifically a paradoxical embolism leading to cryptogenic stroke. The European Society of Cardiology recently published guidelines detailing how PFOs are associated with paradoxical embolism and how they are diagnosed and managed. This review guides physicians in the diagnostic and referral process to a multidisciplinary team involved in PFO closure. It reviews the clinical trials comparing device closure with medical therapy and highlights the current NHS England commissioning process on PFO management. Finally, we give an overview of other conditions where PFO device closure may need to be considered.


Subject(s)
Embolism, Paradoxical , Foramen Ovale, Patent , Stroke , Humans , Stroke/complications , Secondary Prevention , Foramen Ovale, Patent/complications , Foramen Ovale, Patent/diagnosis , Foramen Ovale, Patent/therapy , Embolism, Paradoxical/complications , Embolism, Paradoxical/diagnosis , England , Treatment Outcome
2.
Epilepsia ; 63(8): 1889-1898, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35582761

ABSTRACT

Many brain insults and injuries are "epileptogenic": they increase the risk of developing epilepsy. It is desirable to identify treatments that are "antiepileptogenic": treatments that prevent the development of epilepsy, if administered after the occurrence of an epileptogenic insult. Current antiepileptic drugs are not antiepileptogenic, but evidence of antiepileptogenic efficacy is accumulating for a growing number of other compounds. From among these candidate compounds, statins are deserving of particular attention because statins are reported to be antiepileptogenic in more published studies and in a wider range of brain insults than any other individual or class of compounds. Although many studies report the antiepileptogenic effect of statins, it is unclear how many studies provide evidence that statins exhibit the following two essential features of a clinically viable antiepileptogenic drug: the drug must exert an antiepileptogenic effect even if it is initiated after the epileptogenic brain insult has already occurred, and the antiepileptogenic effect must endure even after the drug has been discontinued. In the current work, we interrogate published preclinical and clinical studies, to determine if statins fulfill these essential requirements. There are eight different statins in clinical use. To enable the clinical use of one of these statins for antiepileptogenesis, its antiepileptogenic effect will have to be established through future time- and resource-intensive clinical trials. Therefore, it is desirable to review the published literature to determine which of the statins emerges as the most promising candidate for antiepileptogenic therapy. Hence, in the current work, we also collate and analyze published data-clinical and pre-clinical, direct and indirect-that help to answer the question: Which statin is the most promising candidate to take forward into an antiepileptogenesis clinical trial?


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Brain , Epilepsy/etiology , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...