SLCO1B1 and ABCB1 variants synergistically influence the atorvastatin treatment response in South Indian coronary artery disease patients.

Introduction: Atorvastatin exhibits wide interindividual variability in treatment response, limiting the drug efficacy in coronary artery disease patients. Aim: To study the effect of genetic variants involved in atorvastatin transport/metabolism and correlate their lipid-lowering efficacy. Materials & methods: Genotyping was performed using 5'-hydrolysis probe method (n = 412), and the study evaluated the treatment response in 86 patients. Results: Significant reduction in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were observed in SLCO1B1-rs4149056, rs4363657 and ABCB1-rs1045642 genotypes. The combined genotypes of ABCB1 and SLCO1B1 showed a strong synergistic effect in reducing the total cholesterol and LDL-C. Diabetes and smoking were observed to influence the LDL-C reduction. Conclusion: The genetic variants of SLCO1B1 and ABCB1 predict the lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin, and this may be useful in genotype-guided statin therapy for coronary artery disease patients.

Linc-ROR genetic variants are associated with the advanced disease in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to identify the association between linc-ROR genetic variants and oral squamous cell carcinoma tumorigenesis. DESIGN: Four genetic variants of linc-ROR (rs6420545, rs4801078, rs1942348, and rs9636089) were analyzed in 178 OSCCs and 191 controls of the South Indian population by PCR amplification followed by restriction digestion. In addition, we examined whether these variants alter linc-ROR expression levels and the progression of OSCC. RESULTS: The frequency of linc-ROR rs6420545 and rs4801078 genotypes were significantly associated with advanced tumor grade (>2) (p = 0.002 and p = 0.048), and nodal metastasis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.019), respectively. We observed a significant association of rs6420545 specifically in the over-dominant model [OR 1.77 (95%CI; 1.17-2.68); p = 0.006] and rs9636089 in dominant model [OR 2.17 (95%CI; 1.06 - 4.46); p = 0.03], and allelic model [OR 2.26 (95%CI; 1.13 - 4.53) p = 0.02], respectively. Further, significant upregulation of linc-ROR (p = 0.005) was observed in our cohort, consistent with the HNSCC TCGA dataset (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the linc-ROR genetic variants could contribute to the metastasis and progression mainly in the late event of tumorigenesis of OSCCs and these variants could be useful in the precision therapeutic management of this cancer particularly in prognosis.

TRPC6 gene promoter polymorphisms in steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome children.

Introduction: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is the most frequent cause of proteinuria in children and is emerging as a leading cause of uremia. Among idiopathic NS, 10% of children do not respond to steroids or to any other immunosuppressive therapy, and progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Several studies have investigated the mutations in genes encoding podocyte proteins and their possible associations with several forms of hereditary NS. Objectives: The present study aimed to determine the distribution of the TRPC6 gene promoter polymorphisms in subjects with features of steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) and controls. Patients and Methods: About 49 unrelated patients with SRNS and 45 age matched controls no renal or other disorders were included in the study. PCR-RFLP was used for genotyping rs3824934 (-254C>G) and rs56134796 (-218C>T) polymorphisms located in TRPC6 gene promoter region. Results: Both -254C>G and -218C>T are polymorphic in both SRNS patients and controls. No statistically significant differences in genotypes or allele frequencies between SRNS patients and controls were observed. Linkage disequilibrium was not strong and significant and haplotypes were not associated with SRNS. Interaction analysis by multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) revealed a significant interaction between -254G>C and -218C>T in <10 years age group. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the TRPC6 polymorphisms do not affect susceptibility of SRNS in Indian population. Further replications, preferably a systematic search for TRPC6 functional variants that affect gene expression are desirable for validation of our findings.

Role of the ACE ID and PPARG P12A Polymorphisms in Genetic Susceptibility of Diabetic Nephropathy in a South Indian Population.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the life-threatening disorders characterized by persistent albuminuria, raised arterial blood pressure, a lowered glomerular filtration rate, and high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The vascular genes ACE (Angiotensin-converting enzyme), and PPARG (peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma) are involved in alterations in vascular endothelium, and are suggested to play a role in the susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to find out the role of ACE ID and PPARG P12A polymorphisms in genetic susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy in south Indian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 54 cases with diabetic nephropathy and 67 control subjects with diabetes were enrolled for our study. DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leucocytes, and genotyped using PCR-electrophoresis (ACE ID) or PCR-RFLP (PPARG P12A) methods. RESULTS: ACE ID genotypes followed Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both cases and controls. But P12A genotypes deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in diabetic controls. Chi(2) test was applied for the analysis of genotypic distributions in genotypic and dominant models. Odds ratios were also calculated. No significant differences in genotype frequencies of ACE ID and PPARG P12A polymorphisms were found on comparing patients with diabetic nephropathy with diabetic controls. The synergistic role of ACE ID* PPARG P12A interaction, did not show any association in patients with diabetic nephropathy when compared to diabetic controls. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the ACE and PPARG genes do not have a key role in conferring risk for diabetic nephropathy.