Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Wounds ; 31(2 Suppl): S1-S17, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30741645

ABSTRACT

Use of ultra-portable, mechanically powered disposable negative pressure wound therapy (dNPWT) has grown as an adjunctive modality to manage wounds in outpatient care and to expedite transition of inpatients to an outpatient setting. This technology has demonstrated similar efficacy and usability for mobile outpatients when compared with electrically powered negative pressure wound therapy devices. It was designed for patients with smaller, low to moderately exudating wounds and does not require batteries or a power source. However, very few studies address best practices for using dNPWT in a variety of wound types. There is a need for comprehensive clinical recommendations to better direct clinicians and patients in using this therapy. In addition, it is critical that providers are knowledgeable about processes for obtaining reimbursement for placement of dNPWT since codes and procedures differ drastically from standard NPWT. A panel meeting of experts with a high level of experience with dNPWT in varied wound types was convened to develop clinical recommendations and summarize current US reimbursement coding guidelines for the use of dNPWT. This publication summarizes the recommendations from panel members, in addition to supporting evidence, to help guide appropriate use of dNPWT. Panel recommendations regarding optimal patient and wound selection, wound preparation, proper patient training, and use of dNPWT in various wound types are included as well as clinical techniques for dressing application, bridging under offloading devices and compression, maintaining a seal, and protecting intact skin. Processes and codes for obtaining reimbursement for dNPWT are reviewed by care setting. Clinical recommendations and reimbursement guidelines summarized in this publication are meant to provide direction to clinicians in using dNPWT that potentially could translate into improved clinical and economic value.


Subject(s)
Disposable Equipment , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Disposable Equipment/economics , Exudates and Transudates , Humans , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/economics , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/instrumentation , Outpatients , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reimbursement Mechanisms , Trauma Severity Indices , Wound Healing , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Wounds and Injuries/pathology
2.
Br J Community Nurs ; 22(Sup12): S41-S47, 2017 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29189076

ABSTRACT

The rates of chronic oedema in the US continue to grow from multiple causative factors. One such factor is the skyrocketing rates of morbid obesity. There are about 40 million obese people in the US today. Among those people, the prevalence rate of lymphoedema is 74% ( Fife and Carter, 2008 ). Treatment usually involves some type of compression for life, but that is easier said than done. Many patients with chronic oedema have dexterity issues or have limited abilities to put on tight compression options. This article explores a product that has just been recently launched on the market: the Extremit-Ease® compression garment. This article also looks at five case studies involving the product to evaluate its effectiveness in the treatment of this growing condition. We explore the increasing problem of chronic oedema, specifically oedema caused by lymphoedema and venous stasis, and how Extremit-Ease compression garments could assist patient compliance with the gold standard treatment.


Subject(s)
Compression Bandages , Lower Extremity/physiopathology , Lymphedema/etiology , Lymphedema/therapy , Obesity/complications , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome , United States
3.
Wounds ; 27(11): 282-92, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26574750

ABSTRACT

Over the years, autologous skin grafting has been used extensively to achieve wound closure, optimize a functional scar, and improve aesthetic outcomes for the patient. Although a vast majority of the literature is on the use of full-thickness and split-thickness skin grafts, epidermal skin grafts (ESGs) have emerged as a viable option in the reconstructive ladder when only the epidermal layer is needed. These grafts are distinct from other types of autologous skin grafts in that they can be harvested without anesthesia and leave minimal or no scarring at the donor site. In order to explore the use of ESGs in the continuum of primary wound closure, a multidisciplinary expert panel convened in October 2014, in Las Vegas, NV, to review the scientific basis and clinical uses of epidermal grafting. This publication provides an overview of epidermal grafting, recommendations for graft application, and potential roles for its use in wound care and closure.


Subject(s)
Autografts , Debridement/methods , Epidermis/transplantation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Skin Transplantation/methods , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cicatrix/prevention & control , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing , Wounds and Injuries/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...