Development, Validation, and Impact of Patient Information Booklet for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.

Background: The inadequate awareness in the general population is a primary concern for the management of various neurosurgical ailments treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). Objective: Our study aimed to assess the written patient information by focusing on readability, recall, communication, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Methodology: The senior author formulated disease-specific patient information booklets. The booklets comprised two segments: general information about GKRS and disease-specific information. The common themes for discussion were "What is your disease?", "What is gamma knife radiosurgery?", "What are the alternatives to gamma knife radiosurgery," "The benefits of gamma knife radiosurgery," "About gamma knife radiosurgery," "Recovering from gamma knife radiosurgery," "Follow up," "What are the risks," and "Contact." The booklet was emailed after the first consultation to 102 patients. Patients' socioeconomic status and comprehensibility were assessed on validated scoring. Post-GKRS, we emailed a custom-made Google feedback survey of 10 leading questions about the role of patient information booklet in educating and decision-making process. We tried to assess if the booklet helped the patient understand the disease and treatment options. Results: In total, 94% of patients read it thoroughly and understood it to their satisfaction. They also shared and discussed the information booklet with their family members and relatives (92%). Furthermore, 96% of patients found the disease-specific information informative. For 83% of patients, the information brochure cleared the doubts regarding the GKRS completely. For 66% of patients, their expectations met the reality. In addition, 94% of patients still recommended giving the booklet to the patients. All high, upper- and middle-class responders were happy and content with the patient information booklet. In contrast, 18 (90%) of the lower middle class and 2 (66.7%) of the lower class considered the information useful to the patients. Also, 90% patients found the language of the patient information booklet comprehensible and not too technical to understand. Conclusions: An essential component of disease management is to relieve the anxiety and confusion in the patient's mind and help one choose a treatment modality among the available options. A patient-centric booklet helps impart knowledge, clears doubts, and provides an opportunity to discuss options with family members.

Hypo-fractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Intra-cranial Pathologies: A Single-Center Prospective Analysis of Feasibility, Safety, Efficacy, and Complication Profile.

Background: Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a proven and effective treatment modality for various benign, malignant, and functional intra-cranial pathologies. In certain situations, single-fraction SRS is limited because of lesion size and location. Hypo-fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery (hfGKRS) is an alternative approach for such unconventional indications. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, safety, and complication profile of hfGKRS with evaluation of different fractionation schemes and dosing patterns. Methodology: The authors prospectively evaluated 202 patients treated with frame-based hfGKRS over a 9-year period. GKRS was administered fractionated because of either a large volume (>14 cc) or an inability to spare neighboring organs at risk from permissible radiation in single-session GKRS. The inter-fraction interval was kept at 24 hours, and the dose calculation was performed with linear quadratic equations. Patients with more than 3 years of clinical and radiological follow-up were included in prospective analysis. At pre-decided follow-up criteria, treatment effects and side effects were documented on objective scales. Results: A total of 169/202 patients met inclusion criteria. 41% patients received treatment in three fractions, whereas 59% received two-fraction GKRS. Two patients of giant cavernous sinus hemangiomas were treated with 5 Gy in the five-fraction regimen. In patients with more than 3 years of follow-up, the obliteration rate was 88% for complex arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated with hfGKRS because of eloquent locations, whereas it was 62% for Spetzler-Martin grade 4-5 AVMs. For non-AVM pathologies (meningiomas, schwannomas, pituitary adenomas, paragangliomas, hypothalamic hamartomas, etc.), the 5-year progression free survival was 95%. Tumor failure was noted in 0.05% patient population. Radiation necrosis developed in 8.1% patients, and radiation-induced brain edema developed in 12% patients. It was resistant to treatment in 4% patients. No patient developed radiation-induced malignancy. Hypo-fractionation did not provide any hearing improvement in giant vestibular schwannomas. Conclusion: hfGKRS is a valuable standalone treatment option for candidates unsuitable for single-session GKRS. The dosing parameters need to be tailored as per the pathology and neighboring structures. It provides comparable results to single-session GKRS with an acceptable safety and complication profile.