Patient out-of-pocket costs for guideline-recommended treatments for erectile dysfunction: a medicare cost modeling analysis.

Patient out-of-pocket (OOP) cost represents an access barrier to erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment. We determined OOP cost for men with ED covered by Fee-for-Service Medicare. Coverage policies were obtained from the Medicare Coverage Database for treatments recommended by the 2018 American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. OOP cost was retrieved from the 2023 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Final Rule. OOP cost for treatments without Medicare coverage were extracted from GoodRx® or literature and inflated to 2022 dollars. Annual prescription costs were calculated using the published estimate of 52.2 yearly instances of sexual intercourse. Medicare has coverage for inflatable penile prostheses (IPP; strong recommendation), non-coverage for vacuum erection devices (VED; moderate recommendation) and phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5i; strong recommendation), and no policies for intracavernosal injections (ICI; moderate recommendation), intraurethral alprostadil (IA; conditional recommendation), or low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT; conditional recommendation). Annual IA prescription is most costly ($4022), followed by ICI prescription ($3947), one ESWT course ($3445), IPP ($1600), PDE5i prescription ($696), and one VED ($213). PDE5i and IPP, both strongly recommended by AUA guidelines, are associated with lower OOP cost. Better understanding of patient financial burden may inform healthcare decision-making.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Endourology: Maximizing the Promise Through Consideration of the Principles of Diffusion of Innovation Theory.

INTRODUCTION: Diffusion of Innovation Theory explains how ideas or products gain momentum and diffuse (or spread) through specific populations or social systems over time. The theory analyzes primary influencers of the spread of new ideas, including the innovation itself, communication channels, time, and social systems. METHODS: The current study reviewed published medical literature to identify studies and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in endourology and utilized E.M. Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory to analyze the primary influencers of the adoption of AI in endourological care. The insights gained were triaged and prioritized into AI application-related action items or 'tips' for facilitating the appropriate diffusion of the most valuable endourological innovations. RESULTS: Published medical literature indicates that AI is still a research-based tool in endourology and is not widely used in clinical practice. The published studies have presented AI models and algorithms to assist with stone disease detection (n=17), the prediction of management outcomes (n=18), the optimization of operative procedures (n=9), and the elucidation of stone disease chemistry and composition (n=24). Five tips for facilitating appropriate adoption of endourological AI are: (1) Develop/prioritize training programs to establish the foundation for effective use; (2) Create appropriate data infrastructure for implementation, including its maintenance and evolution over time; (3) Deliver AI transparency to gain the trust of endourology stakeholders; (4) Adopt innovations in the context of continuous quality improvement (CQI) Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles as these approaches have proven track records for improving care quality; and (5) Be realistic about what AI can/cannot currently do and document to establish the basis for shared understanding. CONCLUSION: Diffusion of Innovation Theory provides a framework for analyzing the influencers of the adoption of AI in endourological care. The five tips identified through this research may be used to facilitate appropriate diffusion of the most valuable endourological innovations.

Antioxidant Supplementation for Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of antioxidant supplementation for treating erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of oral antioxidant supplementation in men with ED. Erectile function was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) score. Using random-effects meta-analysis models, antioxidant and placebo groups were compared for erectile function using the mean difference in IIEF-EF score adjusted to a 6-30 scale and for side effects using the log risk ratio. RESULTS: The review included 23 trials of 1,583 men (median age 51 years) treated with antioxidant supplementation or placebo for a median of 12 weeks (range, 4 weeks to 6 months). Antioxidant supplementation significantly improved erectile function compared to placebo, with a mean difference of 5.5 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7 to 7.3; p<0.001) on the IIEF-EF. In meta-regression, the treatment benefit was greater in men with more severe ED (p<0.001). Side effects were uncommon, none were serious, and the frequency was comparable between antioxidant (3.8%) and placebo (2.1%) groups (log risk ratio=0.36; 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.97; p=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Antioxidant supplementation appears safe and significantly improves erectile function in men with ED, particularly those with more severe symptoms. Limitations of this review included unknown long-term efficacy and safety and the inability to make specific product and dosing recommendations due to the variety of antioxidants and regimens studied.

Prevalence and determinants of shared decision-making for PSA testing in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing but appears underutilized. This population-based study assessed the prevalence and determinants of SDM for PSA testing among US men. METHODS: We assessed PSA testing rates and SDM engagement in men aged 40 and older without prostate cancer history using the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. SDM was defined as discussing the advantages and disadvantages of PSA testing with a physician. We used multivariable logistic regression with machine learning to identify factors associated with lack of SDM. RESULTS: Among 9723 eligible participants (mean age 58 years), lifetime PSA testing prevalence was 45.9% and the 1-year testing incidence was 29.1%. Only 24.1% reported engaging in SDM with a physician, while 62.9% never discussed PSA testing. Younger age and lower education levels were the primary determinants of decreased SDM engagement. Men with less education engaged in SDM less than half as often as those with higher education levels across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Societal guidelines recommend SDM for PSA testing. However, most men, regardless of age, have never engaged in SDM conversations with a healthcare provider about PSA testing, especially those with less education. More efforts are needed to improve patient-provider conversations about the potential benefits and harms of PSA testing.

Complications of GreenLight Laser vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes and complications between GreenLight and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: A systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing GreenLight with TURP was completed. Primary outcomes included periprocedural milestones, 12 predefined complications, Clavien-Dindo class III-V complications, reoperations (all-cause), and a composite of reoperations and readmissions. Metaregression assessed the relationship between patient- and study-level factors with periprocedural outcomes and reoperation rates. RESULTS: The review included 13 randomized trials with 1757 patients (839 GreenLight; 918 TURP). Procedure time was 10 minutes (95% CI: 5 to 15; P < .001) longer with GreenLight, while catheterization time (mean difference=-1.3days; 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.9; P<.001) and hospital stay (mean difference=-2.1days; 95% CI: -2.5 to -1.7; P<.001) were shorter. Bleeding-related complications, including clot retention (risk ratio [RR]=0.12; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.32; P<.001) and transfusion (RR=0.26; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.58; P = .001), as well as sexual dysfunction (RR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.98; P = .04), were less frequent with GreenLight. All other complications occurred at similar frequencies between groups. The risks of reoperation (RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.66; P = .38) and reoperation or readmission (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.44; P = .79) did not differ. CONCLUSION: GreenLight achieved shorter catheterization times and hospital stays with lower rates of sexual dysfunction and bleeding-related complications compared to TURP.

Water Vapor Thermal Therapy in Men With Prostate Volume ≥80 cm3: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum) in men with large prostate volumes of at least 80cm3. METHODS: We performed systematic searches for studies of Rezum therapy in men with prostate volume of at least 80 cm3. Meta-analysis outcomes included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS Quality of Life (IPSS-QOL), Qmax, postvoid residual, International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF), and serious (Clavien-Dindo grade III-V) complications, surgical retreatments. Outcomes were analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis model. RESULTS: The review included 15 studies (11 retrospective) of 471 men with prostate volume at least 80 cm3 treated with Rezum therapy and followed for a median of 6months (range: 3-17months). Rezum therapy resulted in statistically significant improvements in IPSS (mean change: -11.0; 95% CI: -12.2, -9.7; P < .001), IPSS-QOL (mean change: -2.9; 95% CI: -3.5, -2.4; P < .001), Qmax (mean change: 6.5 mL/s; 95% CI: 4.8, 8.2 mL/s; P < .001), and postvoid residual (mean change: -101 mL; 95% CI: -145, -57; P < .001). No change in IIEF-EF was observed (mean change: 0.3; 95% CI: -1.1, 1.6; P = .71). Serious complications occurred in <0.1% (95% CI: 0.0%, 0.4%) and surgical retreatment in 1.2% (95% CI: 0.0%, 3.5%) of patients. CONCLUSION: Rezum therapy provides a statistically significant and clinically important short-term improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms with low complication rates in men with prostate volume of at least 80 cm3. Long-term outcomes with Rezum therapy in large prostates remain unclear.

Carcinoma of the axillary tail of Spence: A rare case report.

INTRODUCTION: Carcinoma arising from the axillary tail of Spence (CATS) is a rare entity that requires a high level of clinical suspicion. The clinicopathologic, prognostic, and imaging features of CATS are poorly understood. CASE SUMMARY: A 46-year-old woman presented to our hospital with right axillary swelling associated with bleeding and foul-smelling discharge. She had initially presented to a different hospital with a similar presentation where she was diagnosed with metastatic carcinoma, favouring adenocarcinoma on the FNAC report, following which she received 3 cycles of chemotherapy. MRI and PET-CT scan workups at our hospital showed a soft tissue mass likely arising from the axillary tail of the right breast with a few enlarged axillary lymph nodes and an unremarkable right breast. She underwent excision of the mass with axillary lymph node dissection and reconstruction with a pedicled Latissimus dorsi flap. The final diagnosis was based on immunohistochemistry, with tumor cells positive for GATA3 and CK-7, negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR), positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2 neu), and having a Ki-67 labelling index of 45 %. DISCUSSION: Carcinoma of the axillary tail of Spence (CATS) has a reported incidence of 0.3 %. There have been only few papers till date that have reported the clinicopathologic, prognostic, and imaging features of CATS. MRI is an important imaging modality to localize CATS. Histologic examination aids in the diagnosis by identifying the presence of a histologic pattern of primary breast carcinoma and immunohistochemical characteristics such as ER, PR, Her2neu, and gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP). Due to the rarity of CATS, no specific guidelines concerning management currently exist. Surgical management involves wide local excision of the axillary mass with axillary lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: CATS, even though rare, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a patient presenting with an axillary mass. MRI is a valuable tool to distinguish CATS from other lesions. Immunohistochemistry is essential to confirm the diagnosis.

Effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The health benefits of regular aerobic exercise are well established, although there is limited high-quality evidence regarding its impact on erectile function. AIM: To determine the effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function in men and to identify factors that may influence this effect. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of aerobic exercise on erectile function via the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF). The mean difference in IIEF-EF scores between the aerobic exercise and nonexercising control groups was estimated by a random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to evaluate the association of moderator variables on meta-analysis results. OUTCOMES: The IIEF-EF score is reported on a 6-30 scale, with higher values indicating better erectile function. RESULTS: Among 11 randomized controlled trials included in the analysis, aerobic exercise resulted in statistically significant improvements in IIEF-EF scores as compared with controls, with a mean difference of 2.8 points (95% CI, 1.7-3.9; P < .001) and moderate heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 53%). The effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function was greater in men with lower baseline IIEF-EF scores, with improvements of 2.3, 3.3, and 4.9 points for mild, moderate, and severe erectile dysfunction, respectively (P = .02). The meta-analysis results were not influenced by publication bias or individual study effects. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Health care providers should consider recommending regular aerobic exercise as a low-risk nonpharmacologic therapy for men experiencing erectile difficulties. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The primary strength of this review was the generation of level 1 evidence on a topic of general interest regarding sexual health in men. However, the included studies evaluated diverse groups, which may complicate data interpretation for specific segments of the population. CONCLUSION: Regular aerobic exercise can improve the erectile function of men, particularly those with lower baseline IIEF-EF scores.

Implantable Penile Prosthesis for Erectile Dysfunction: Insurance Coverage in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: A manufacturer's benefit verification database was evaluated to ascertain United States health plan insurance coverage for implantable penile prostheses for erectile dysfunction. METHODS: All-payer and employer-sponsored health plan benefit verification databases were queried to determine implantable penile prosthesis approval status. For the all-payer analysis, data by payer were available and presented for 2019-2021 to assess approval status varied by payer and over time. For the employer-sponsored health plan analysis, data by payer were available from 2018-2021. RESULTS: Benefit verification records for the all-payer database were available for 3,167 patients in 2019, 3,016 in 2020, and 2,837 in 2021. Insurance type was preferred provider organization (27.5%), Medicare Advantage (26.9%), Medicare (15.9%), or point-of-service (10.5%). Most patients were approved or verified for implantable penile prosthesis coverage (79.4% in 2019, 79.6% in 2020, and 78.4% in 2021). Coverage was most extensive for government-based insurance (Medicare 98.7%, Medicare Advantage 97.1%, Tricare 100%, and Veterans Affairs 80.0%) but was also favorable for commercial insurance (75.0%). The most common reason for lack of coverage was employer exclusion; the proportion of patients with no coverage due to exclusion increased from 13.5% in 2019 to 17.5% in 2021. Analyses of the employer-sponsored health plan database (n=3,083 patients) showed that 63.1% of patients were approved or verified for coverage and 34.2% did not have coverage due to health plan exclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 80% of patients had implantable penile prosthesis coverage. Employer exclusion was the most common reason for lagging coverage; rates of employer exclusion increased 29.3% from 2019-2021.

A comparative analysis of features and outcome of breast cancer in younger versus older women: A single center experience from Eastern Indian subcontinent.

Purpose: Globally, breast cancer is the leading malignancy in females. Indeed, Asian cohorts show prevalence of breast cancer among women with ages below 40 years. Moreover, these younger cases are globally characterized by poorer prognostic features as well as survival outcomes, than older sufferers with ages above 40 years. Despite this, comparative analyses between older and younger cohorts are sparse from India, where data from the country's eastern part falls shortest. This study attempted a comprehensive analysis of breast cancer between these two cohorts representing the Eastern Indian subcontinent. Methods: Documenting retrospective case-files registered between 2010 and 2015, 394 cases of younger (<40 years) and 1250 older (≥40 years) sufferers of primary breast cancer were noted. The relevant features and follow-up information were also retrieved. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to evaluate the survival outcome. Results: The data, in general, revealed a high percentage of younger sufferers from Eastern Indian regions. Moreover, this younger cohort showed poor survival. Among the younger cohort, cases with poor pathological features (triple negative, node-positive, grade III) were proportionately higher than the older cohort. Indeed, survival among these categories scored significantly low, compared to the older cohort. Conclusion: This Eastern Indian subcontinental data matched the analyses from other parts of India as well as Asian data and clearly showed the prevalence of younger sufferers of breast cancer with poor clinico-pathological features and survival outcomes. Impact: Analyzing age-based features and outcomes from Eastern India, this study provides data in supplementing Indian and Asian scenarios of breast cancer.

Productivity loss and productivity loss costs to United States employers due to priority conditions: a systematic review.

AIMS: To summarize published studies evaluating productivity loss and productivity loss costs associated with cancer, chronic lung disease, depression, pain, and cardiometabolic disease among US employees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed search from the past 10 years was conducted using the terms productivity, absenteeism, presenteeism, cancer, bronchitis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, pain, heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes (limited to English-language publications and studies of adults aged 19-64). Study endpoints included annual incremental time (work hours lost and Work Productivity and Impairment [WPAI] questionnaire overall work impairment) and monetary estimates of productivity loss. Studies were critically appraised using a modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Quality Rating Scheme. RESULTS: Of 2,037 records identified from the search, 183 studies were included. The most common observed condition leading to productivity loss was pain (24%), followed by cancer (22%), chronic lung disease (17%), cardiometabolic disease (16%), and depression (16%). Nearly three-quarters of the studies (n = 133, 72.7%) were case-control/retrospective cohort studies (OCEBM quality rating 3); the remainder were case series/cross-sectional studies (n = 28, 15.3%; quality rating 4), randomized clinical trials (n = 18, 9.8%; quality rating 1); and controlled trials without randomization/prospective comparative cohort trials (n = 4, 2.2%; quality rating 2). Samples sizes ranged from 18 patients to millions of patients for studies using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Most studies found employees lost up to 80 annual incremental work hours; employees with cancer and cardiometabolic disease had the greatest number of work hours lost. Overall percentage work impairment ranged from 10% to 70% and was higher for pain and depression. Annual incremental costs of lost work productivity ranged from $100 to $10,000 and were higher for cancer, pain, and depression. LIMITATIONS: Study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some gaps in evidence for the cost of productivity loss, sufficient data highlight the substantial employer burden of lost productivity among priority conditions.

Investment in workforce health and well-being is a practice pursued by high-performing companies as health improvement strategies have produced excellent returns on investment. This literature review sought to gain a better understanding of employee productivity loss for important diseases (i.e. cancer, chronic lung disease [bronchitis, asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease], depression, pain, and cardiometabolic disease [heart disease, hypertension, or diabetes] to help employers and healthcare payers prioritize investment in workforce health. The findings highlight the substantial burden of lost productivity among these conditions. Most studies found employees lost up to 80 annual work hours and employees with cancer and cardiometabolic disease had the greatest annual incremental number of work hours lost. The proportion of work impairment ranged from 10% to 70% and was higher for employees with pain and depression. The annual cost of lost work productivity ranged from $100 to $10,000 and was higher among employees with cancer, pain, and depression.

Economic burden of complicated ureteral stent removal in patients with kidney stone disease in the USA.

Aim: To examine the medical costs of simple versus complicated ureteral stent removal. Materials & methods: We included adults with kidney stones undergoing simple or complicated cystoscopy-based stent removal (CBSR) post ureteroscopy from the 2014 to 2018 Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database. The medical costs of patients with complicated and simple CBSR were compared. Results: Among 16,682 patients, 2.8% had complicated CBSR. Medical costs for patients with complicated CBSR were higher than for simple CBSR ($2182 [USD] vs $1162; p < 0.0001). Increased stenting time, increased age, southern US geography and encrusted stent diagnoses were significantly associated with complicated CBSR. Conclusion: Complicated ureteral stent removal doubled the medical costs associated with CBSR. Ureteral stents with anti-encrustation qualities may reduce the need for complicated CBSR and associated costs.

Molecular crosstalk between CUEDC2 and ERα influences the clinical outcome by regulating mitosis in breast cancer.

Development of endocrine resistance in hormone-receptor-positive (HR+ve) subtype and lack of definitive target in triple-negative subtype challenge breast cancer management. Contributing to such endocrine resistance is a protein called CUEDC2. It degrades hormone receptors, estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and progesterone receptor. Higher level of CUEDC2 in ERα+ve breast cancer corresponded to poorer disease prognosis. It additionally influences mitotic progression. However, the crosstalk of these two CUEDC2-driven functions in the outcome of breast cancer remained elusive. We showed that CUEDC2 degrades ERα during mitosis, utilising the mitotic-ubiquitination-machinery. We elucidated the importance of mitosis-specific phosphorylation of CUEDC2 in this process. Furthermore, upregulated CUEDC2 overrode mitotic arrest, increasing aneuploidy. Finally, recruiting a prospective cohort of breast cancer, we found significantly upregulated CUEDC2 in HR-ve cases. Moreover, individuals with higher CUEDC2 levels showed a poorer progression-free-survival. Together, our data confirmed that CUEDC2 up-regulation renders ERα+ve malignancies to behave essentially as HR-ve tumors with the prevalence of aneuploidy. This study finds CUEDC2 as a potential prognostic marker and a therapeutic target in the clinical management of breast cancer.

Long-Term Survival Rates of Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The purpose of this study was to determine long-term survival of inflatable penile prosthesis (PP) and identify potential factors that may influence device survival. We performed a systematic review of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of men treated with inflatable PP with at least 5 years of device survival data. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to estimate device survival at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up. The robustness of the meta-analysis results was evaluated in a 1-study removed sensitivity analysis and sources of heterogeneity among studies were investigated with subgroup analysis. In 12 studies (20,161 patients; median age 57 years), PP device survival was 93.3% at 1 year, 91.0% at 3 years, 87.2% at 5 years, 76.8% at 10 years, 63.7% at 15 years, and 52.9% at 20 years. The results of the meta-analysis were not significantly influenced by single study effects in a 1-study removed sensitivity analysis. In a subgroup analysis, 5-year device survival rates were 90.6% vs 82.1% (P = .01) comparing newer vs older studies; no other patient or study design characteristic was statistically associated with device survival rates. In conclusion, the median device survival time of an inflatable PP is approximately 20 years. The factors responsible for improved device survival in newer studies remain unclear and warrant further study.

A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Treatment options for men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have variable efficacy, safety, and retreatment profiles, contributing to variations in patient quality of life and healthcare costs. This study examined the long-term cost-effectiveness of generic combination therapy (CT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of BPH. A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical trials of CT, PUL, WVTT, PVP, and TURP that reported change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for men with BPH and a prostate volume ≤80 cm3. A random-effects network meta-analysis was used to account for the differences in patient baseline clinical characteristics between trials. An Excel-based Markov model was developed with a cohort of males with a mean age of 63 and an average IPSS of 22 to assess the cost-effectiveness of these treatment options at 1 and 5 years from a US Medicare perspective. Procedural and adverse event (AE)-related costs were based on 2021 Medicare reimbursement rates. Total Medicare costs at 5 years were highest for PUL ($9,580), followed by generic CT ($8,223), TURP ($6,328), PVP ($6,152), and WVTT ($2,655). The total cost of PUL was driven by procedural ($7,258) and retreatment ($1,168) costs. At 5 years, CT and PUL were associated with fewer quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) than WVTT, PVP, and TURP. Compared to WVTT, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for both TURP and PVP were above a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY (TURP: $64,409/QALY; PVP: $87,483/QALY). This study provides long-term cost-effectiveness evidence for several common treatment options for men with BPH. WVTT is an effective and economically viable treatment in resource-constrained environments.

Long-Term Risk of Surgery Following First Diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Middle-Aged Men.

Objective Pharmacotherapy is often used to relieve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), yet surgery may be indicated for persistent bothersome symptoms. BPH is common among older men, yet the burden of BPH among middle-aged men may be under-recognized. This study examined the 5-year risk of BPH surgery among middle-aged men following the first BPH diagnosis. Methods Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, males aged 35 to 64 years with a first-time primary diagnosis of BPH who were prescribed oral medication for LUTS were identified. The primary outcome was the risk of BPH surgery within five years of the first BPH diagnosis, which was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. The influence of patient demographics, comorbidities, and medication use on the risk of BPH surgery was explored using a Cox proportional hazards model.  Results Four thousand five hundred ten eligible men, 460 underwent BPH surgery within five years of BPH diagnosis. The most common surgical procedures were transurethral resection of the prostate and laser enucleation. The risk of BPH surgery over five years following BPH diagnosis was 10.2% (95% CI: 9.4% to 11.1%). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, patient age was the primary factor associated with higher surgery risk. Compared to men aged 35 to 44 years, the hazard ratio for BPH surgery was 3.9 (95% CI: 1.9 to 8.4; p<0.001) among men aged 45 to 54 years, and 5.0 (95% CI: 2.4 to 10.6; p<0.001) among men aged 55 to 64 years. Conclusions In middle-aged men prescribed oral medication for LUTS secondary to BPH, the risk of BPH surgery was 10.2% over five years. This risk may be underappreciated and highlights the clinical need for surgical procedures with favorable risk-to-benefit profiles.

The Economic Burden of Cystoscopy-Based Ureteral Stent Removal in the United States: An Analysis of Nearly 30,000 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral stents are commonly placed after ureteroscopy. We examined the rate of cystoscopy-based stent removal (CBSR) following ureteroscopy for stone disease and its economic burden in the United States. METHODS: Adults undergoing ureteroscopy and stenting (index surgery) for stone disease between 2014 and 2018 were identified using the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Database. Patients were categorized as those with CBSR or without CBSR within 6 months post-index surgery. Rate and location of CBSR were assessed. To estimate the economic burden of CBSR, medical costs (2019 U.S. dollars) paid by insurers were calculated at 6 months post-index surgery. A generalized linear model examined the association of CBSR with total costs adjusting for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Among 29,535 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 56.5% had CBSR within 6 months. Median time to CBSR was 9 days; 70% of patients with CBSR had their stent removed in the office. Medical costs for CBSR patients were significantly higher than those for nonCBSR patients ($7,808 vs $6,231; p <0.0001). The difference was driven by the cost of CBSR ($1,132 vs $0; p <0.0001) and health care utilization for stone disease ($2,464 vs $2,121; p <0.0001). CBSR was associated with a 17% increase in medical costs compared to nonCBSR (OR: 1.17; 95% CI 3.03, 3.46). CONCLUSIONS: Over 50% of patients had CBSR within 6 months following ureteroscopy. Medical costs for patients undergoing CBSR were significantly higher and driven by the cost of CBSR and resource utilization for stone disease. Ureteral stents that avoid CBSR can lower medical costs to the health care system.

The Epidemic of COVID-19-Related Erectile Dysfunction: A Scoping Review and Health Care Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 infection is expected to be associated with an increased likelihood of erectile dysfunction (ED). Considering the high transmissibility of COVID-19, ED may be a concerning consequence for a large segment of the population. AIMS: To (1) summarize existing published evidence for the impact of COVID-19 on the prevalence, severity, treatment, and management of ED; and (2) identify health-related trends in the emerging literature and identify gaps in the existing research literature and make recommendations for future research needs in the area. METHODS: A scoping literature search was conducted on April 27, 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-ScR) checklist was followed. The literature search was performed in PubMed using the terms: COVID-19, erectile, sexual, and dysfunction. A total of 693 publications were screened for relevance. Studies were appraised for their level of evidence based on study design and the rigor of methodology. RESULTS: The evidence that COVID-19 infection causes or impacts ED is compelling. Four topics emerged regarding the nature of the association between COVID-19 and ED: (1) the biological impact of COVID-19 infection on ED; (2) the mental health impact of COVID-19 on ED; (3) the impact of COVID-19 on the management of ED and access to ED treatment; and (4) health disparities and the impact of COVID-19 on ED. Long-term and well-designed studies are needed to clarify the extent of the impact of COVID-19 on ED. The pandemic exposed several vulnerabilities within worldwide healthcare and social systems. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 has a uniquely harmful impact on men's health and erectile function through biological, mental health, and healthcare access mechanisms. As the pandemic wanes, strategies to identify long-term effects and additional health care support may be needed to adequately mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on men's health. Hsieh T-C, Edwards NC, Bhattacharyya SK, et al.The Epidemic of COVID-19-Related Erectile Dysfunction: A Scoping Review and Health Care Perspective. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:286-310.

Cost of Lost Productivity Due to Erectile Dysfunction and Impact of Employer Benefit Exclusion of Penile Prosthesis Implantation Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the cost of lost productivity due to erectile dysfunction (ED) and employer benefit exclusion of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) among men with employer-sponsored health insurance. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed using administrative claims data, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, and published literature. The economic impact of ED productivity loss and PPi benefit exclusion was reported in2019USD. RESULTS: Men with ED had an additional 282.7 hours/ year of work impairment compared to men without ED, resulting in annual incremental costs of $7270. US employers excluding PPi benefits could lose $9.3billion/year of work due to additional work impairment from ED. CONCLUSIONS: Productivity loss due to ED and PPI benefit exclusion have considerable economic impacts on men with ED and their employers. continuous advocacy for benefit exclusion removal is needed to ensure appropriate patient access.

SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer injection prior to stereotactic body radiation therapy for men with localized prostate cancer: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is a common treatment for men with localized prostate cancer. A growing consensus suggests that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is similarly effective but less costly and more convenient for patients. The SpaceOAR hydrogel rectal spacer placed between the prostate and rectum reduces radiation-induced rectal injury in patients receiving conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, but spacer efficacy with SBRT is unclear. The purpose of this research was to assess the clinical utility of the hydrogel rectal spacer in men receiving SBRT for prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies in men who received the SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer prior to SBRT (≥5.0 Gy fractions) for treatment of localized prostate center. Rectal irradiation results were compared to controls without spacer implant; all other outcomes were reported descriptively owing to lack of comparative data incuding perirectal separation distance, rectal irradiation on a dosimetric curve, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and freedom from biochemical failure. GI toxicity was reported as the risk of a grade 2 or 3+ bowel complication in early (≤3 months) and late (>3 months) follow-up. RESULTS: In 11 studies with 780 patients, SBRT protocols ranged from 7 to 10 Gy per fraction with total dose ranging from 19 to 45 Gy. Perirectal distance achieved with the rectal spacer ranged from 9.6 to 14.5 mm (median 10.8 mm). Compared to controls receiving no spacer, SpaceOAR placement reduced the radiation delivered to the rectum by 29% to 56% across a dosimetric profile curve. In early follow-up, grade 2 GI complications were reported in 7.0% of patients and no early grade 3+ GI complications were reported. In late follow-up, the corresponding rates were 2.3% for grade 2 and 0.3% for grade 3 GI toxicity. Over 16 months median follow-up, freedom from biochemical failure ranged from 96.4% to 100% (pooled mean 97.4%). CONCLUSIONS: SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer placed between the prostate and rectum prior to SBRT is a promising preventative strategy that increases the distance between the prostate and rectum, reduces rectal radiation exposure, and may lower the risk of clinically important GI complications.