Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Europace ; 24(2): 218-225, 2022 02 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347080

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The contemporary trends in catheter ablation (CA) and surgical ablation (SA) utilization and surgical techniques [open vs. thoracoscopic, with or without left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)] are unclear. In addition, the in-hospital outcomes of stand-alone SA compared with CA are not well-described. METHODS AND RESULTS: The National Inpatient Sample 2010-18 was queried for atrial fibrillation (AF) hospitalizations with CA or stand-alone SA. Complex samples multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to compare the association between stand-alone SA vs. CA and the primary outcomes of in-hospital mortality and stroke. Of 180 243 hospitalizations included within the study, 167 242 were for CA and 13 000 were for stand-alone SA. Catheter ablation and stand-alone SA hospitalizations decreased throughout the study period (Ptrend < 0.001). Surgical ablation had higher rates of in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.61; P = 0.001] and stroke (aOR 4.64; 95% CI 3.25-6.64; P < 0.001) compared with CA. When examining different surgical approaches, thoracoscopic SA was associated with similar in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.53; 95% CI 0.60-3.89; P = 0.369) and similar risk of stroke (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.00-3.07; P = 0.051) compared with CA. CONCLUSION: Stand-alone SA comprises a minority of AF ablation procedures and is associated with increased risk of mortality, stroke, and other in-hospital complications compared to CA. However, when a thoracoscopic approach was utilized, the risks of mortality and stroke appear to be reduced.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Catheters , Hospitals , Humans , Treatment Outcome
2.
Future Oncol ; 15(33): 3861-3876, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31668087

ABSTRACT

Selective delivery of therapeutic agents into solid tumors has been a major challenge impeding the achievement of long-term disease remission and cure. The need to develop alternative drug delivery routes to achieve higher drug concentration in tumor tissue, reduce unwanted off-target side effects and thus achieve greater therapeutic efficacy, has resulted in an explosive body of research. Bifidobacterium spp. are anaerobic, nonpathogenic, Gram-positive bacteria, commensal to the human gut that are a possible anticancer drug-delivery vehicle. In this review, we describe Bifidobacterium's microbiology, current clinical applications, overview of the preclinical work investigating Bifidobacterium's potential to deliver anticancer therapy, and review the different strategies used up to date. Finally, we discuss both current challenges and future prospects.


Subject(s)
Bifidobacterium/physiology , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Immunotherapy/methods , Medical Oncology/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Precision Medicine/methods , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Genes, Reporter/genetics , Genetic Therapy/methods , Genetic Vectors/administration & dosage , Genetic Vectors/genetics , Humans , Medical Oncology/trends , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/immunology , Plasmids/genetics , Precision Medicine/trends , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...