Association of Cabozantinib Dose Reductions for Toxicity With Clinical Effectiveness in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC): Results From the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis).

BACKGROUND: Cabozantinib, an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The association between toxicity and therapeutic effectiveness has been established with other TKIs. We investigated whether cabozantinib dose reductions, a surrogate for toxicity and adequate drug exposure, were associated with improved clinical outcomes in mRCC. METHODS: Employing the CKCis database, we analyzed patients treated with cabozantinib in the second line or later between 2011 to 2021. The cohort was stratified into those needing dose reductions (DR) during treatment and those not (no-DR). Outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS), were compared based on dose reduction status. The influence of the initial dose on outcomes was also explored. RESULTS: Among 319 cabozantinib-treated patients, 48.3% underwent dose reductions. Response rates exhibited no significant difference between the DR and no-DR groups (15.1% vs. 18.2%, P = .55). Patients with DR had superior median OS (26.15 vs. 15.47 months, P = .019) and TTF (12.74 vs. 6.44 months, P = .022) compared to no-DR patients. These differences retained significance following adjustment for IMDC risk group (OS HR = 0.67, P = .032; TTF HR = 0.65, P = .008). There was no association between the initial dose and ORR, OS, or TTF. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the link between cabozantinib dose reductions due to toxicity and improved survival and time to treatment failure in mRCC patients. These findings underscore the potential of using on-treatment toxicity as an indicator of adequate drug exposure to individualize dosing and optimize treatment effectiveness. Larger studies are warranted to validate these results and develop individualized strategies for cabozantinib when given alone or in combination with immunotherapy.

The impact of robotic surgery access on the management of patients with clinical stage I kidney tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery is used in the treatment of kidney tumors. We aimed to determine if robotic access was associated with initial choice of management for patients with a clinical stage I kidney mass. METHODS: Patients with a clinical stage I kidney mass were identified from the Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis) cohort. Sites were classified by year and access to robotic surgery. Associations between robotic access and initial management were determined using logistic regression. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed, adjusting for tumor size and stage, and presented as relative risks (RR ) or adjusted RR (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Overall, 4160 patients were included. Among patients treated with surgery, the proportion of partial nephrectomy compared to radical nephrectomy was significantly higher in robotic sites (77.3% for robotic sites vs. 65.9% for non-robotic sites; RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.23, p<0.0001; aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.17, p<0.0001). Patients receiving partial nephrectomy at sites with robotic access were more likely to receive a minimally invasive approach compared to patients at non-robotic sites (61.4% vs. 50.9%, RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.30; aRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.25, p<0.0001). The proportion of patients managed by active surveillance was not significantly different between robotic (405, 16.9%) and non-robotic (258, 14.7%) sites (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.99-1.32; aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Access to robotic kidney surgery was associated with increased use of partial nephrectomy and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Use of active surveillance was similar at robotic and non-robotic institutions. Limitations of this study include lack of data on perioperative complications and cancer recurrence.

Real-world Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with or Without Sarcomatoid Features Treated with First-line Systemic Therapies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients have been reported to have better outcomes when treated with immunotherapies (IO) compared to targeted therapies (TT). This study aims to evaluate the impact of first-line systemic therapies on survival of mRCC patients with or without sarcomatoid features using real-world data. METHODS: Metastatic RCC patients of International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate or high risk, diagnosed from January 2011 to December 2022, treated with first-line systemic therapies, and with histological documentation of the presence or absence of sarcomatoid features in nephrectomy specimens were identified using the Canadian Kidney Cancer information system. Patients were classified by initial treatment: (1) targeted therapy (TT) used alone or (2) immunotherapy (IO)-based systemic therapies used in combination of either IO-IO or IO-TT. The inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was used to balance for covariates. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the impact of initial treatment received on overall survival (OS). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 1202 eligible patients, 791 were treated with TT and 411 with IO combinations. Of the patients, 76% were male, and the majority (91%) had a nephrectomy before systemic therapy. In nonsarcomatoid patients (639 TT and 320 IO patients), treatment with IO was associated with improved OS compared with patients treated with TT (median of 72 vs 48 mo, hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.80, objective response rate [ORR] of 38.5% for IO and 23.5% for TT). In sarcomatoid patients (152 TT and 91 IO patients), treatment with IO was associated with improved OS (median of 48 vs 18 mo, HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.64, ORR of 49.5% for IO and 13.8% for TT). Similar results were observed in patients with synchronous metastatic disease only. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: IO treatment was associated with improved survival in mRCC patients. The magnitude of benefit is increased in patients with sarcomatoid mRCC, consequently, identifying the sarcomatoid status early on could help healthcare providers make a better treatment decision. PATIENT SUMMARY: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients of International mRCC Database Consortium intermediate and high risk, diagnosed from January 2011 to December 2022, treated with first-line systemic therapies, and with histological documentation of the presence or absence of sarcomatoid features in nephrectomy specimens were identified using the Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis). In this study, treatment with immunotherapy was associated to an improved survival and response rates for mRCC patients with and without sarcomatoid features. The magnitude of benefit is increased in patients with sarcomatoid mRCC.

Trends of Utilization of Systemic Therapies for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Canadian Health Care System.

PURPOSE: Standard-of-care therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have greatly evolved. However, the availability of emerging options in global health care systems can vary. We sought to describe the integration and usage of systemic therapies for mRCC in Canada since 2011. METHODS: We included patients with mRCC enrolled in the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System, a prospective cohort of patients from 14 Canadian academic centers, who received systemic therapy from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. Patients were stratified by treatment era (cohort 1: 2011-2015, cohort 2: 2016-2021). Stacked bar charts were used to present treatment proportions; Sankey diagrams were used to show the evolution of treatment sequencing between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Four thousand one hundred seven patients were diagnosed with mRCC, of whom 2,752 (67%) received systemic therapy. Among these patients, mean age was 64 years, 74% were male, 75% had clear cell histology, and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification was favorable, intermediate, and poor in 16%, 56%, and 28%, respectively. Utilization of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI)-based treatments has increased in Canada and reflects global and local patterns of approval and adoption. The use of therapies after doublet ICI has mostly shifted toward vascular endothelial growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKIs) that were previously used in first line with subsequent treatments reflecting approved and available agents after previous VEGF-TKI. Clinical trial participation among patients who received systemic therapy was 18% in first, 21% in second, and 24% in third line. CONCLUSION: In Canada's publicly funded health care system, availability of standard mRCC therapies broadly reflects access from government-funded clinical trials and compassionate access program sources. In an evolving therapeutic landscape, ongoing advocacy is required to continue to facilitate patient access to efficacious therapies.

Comparison of patients with renal cell carcinoma in adjuvant therapy trials to a real-world population.

PURPOSE: To compare characteristics and outcomes of patients included versus those not in adjuvant therapy trials post complete resection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Adult patients following complete resection for clear cell RCC between January 1, 2011, and March 31, 2021, were included. Patients had intermediate high, high risk nonmetastatic disease (modified UCLA Integrated Staging System) or fully resected metastatic (M1) disease as per the inclusion criteria of adjuvant studies. Demographic, clinical, and outcomes between trial and nontrial patients were compared. RESULTS: Of 1,459 eligible patients, 63 (4.3%) participated in an adjuvant trial. Disease characteristics were similar between groups. Trial patients were younger (mean age 58.1 vs. 63.6 years; P < 0.0001) and had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (mean 4.2 vs. 4.9; P = 0.009). Unadjusted disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years for trial patients was 48.6% and 39.2% for nontrial patients (HR 0.71, 0.48-1.05, P = 0.08). Median DFS was higher for trial patients in comparison to nontrial patients (4.4 years, IQR 1.7- not reached; vs. 3.0 years, IQR 0.8-8.6; P = 0.08). Cancer specific survival (CSS) at 5 years for trial patients was 85.2% in comparison to 78.6% for nontrial patients (HR 0.45, 0.22-0.92, P = 0.03). Unadjusted estimated overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 80.8% for trial patients and 74.8% (HR 0.42, 0.18-0.94; P = 0.04) for nontrial patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in adjuvant trials were younger and healthier with longer CSS and OS in comparison to those not included in adjuvant trials. These findings may have implications when we generalize trial results to real world patients.

Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma: 2023 Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum consensus statement.

INTRODUCTION: Several recent randomized trials evaluated the impact of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy on post-surgical outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with disparate results. The objective of this consensus statement is to provide data-driven guidance regarding the use of ICIs after complete resection of clear-cell RCC in a Canadian context. METHODS: An expert panel of genitourinary medical oncologists, urologic oncologists, and radiation oncologists with expertise in RCC management was convened in a dedicated session during the 2022 Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum in Toronto, Canada. Topic statements on the management of patients after surgery for RCC, including counselling, risk stratification, indications for medical oncology referral, appropriate followup, eligibility and management for adjuvant ICIs, as well as treatment options for patients with recurrence who received adjuvant immunotherapy, were discussed. Participants were asked to vote if they agreed or disagreed with each statement. Consensus was achieved if greater than 75% of participants agreed with the topic statement. RESULTS: A total of 22 RCC experts voted on 14 statements. Consensus was achieved on all topic statements. The panel felt patients with clear-cell RCC at increased risk of recurrence after surgery, as per the Keynote-564 group definitions, should be counselled about recurrence risk by a urologist, should be informed about the potential role of adjuvant ICI systemic therapy, and be offered referral to discuss risks and benefits with a medical oncologist. The panel felt that one year of pembrolizumab is currently the only regimen that should be considered if adjuvant therapy is selected. Panelists emphasized current opinions are based on disease-free survival given the available results. Significant uncertainty regarding the benefit and harms of adjuvant therapy remains, primarily due to a lack of consistent benefit observed across similar trials of adjuvant ICI-based therapies and immature overall survival (OS) data. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus document provides guidance from Canadian RCC experts regarding the potential role of ICI-based adjuvant systemic therapy after surgery. This rapidly evolving field requires frequent evidence-based re-evaluation.

Assessment of the epidemiological trends for prostate cancer using administrative data in Ontario.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown fluctuations in prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and prevalence over time and by region. Less is known about the most recent epidemiological trends by PCa disease stage. METHODS: This study was a population-based, sequential, cross-sectional analysis that used administrative health data from Ontario, Canada. After inclusion, patients were classified into non-metastatic (nm) PCa and metastatic (m) PCa. The primary study outcome was a description of temporal trends in the incidence and prevalence of PCa over the study period (2010-2019), stratified by disease state. Crude incidence and prevalence rates were estimated for each year in the study period. RESULTS: Overall, there were 131 718 men living with PCa in 2019. The incident cohort contained 86 123 patients with nmPCa (n=65 691, 76.3%), mPCa (n=8431, 9.8%), or unknown stage (n=12 001, 13.9%). The prevalence increased from 216 to 253 per 10 000 men between 2010 and 2019, respectively. Between 2011 and 2014, overall PCa incidence decreased from 20.9 to 15.4 per 10 000 men, followed by an increase to 18.8 per 10 000 in 2018. The nmPCa incidence rate was considerably higher compared with mPCa and followed a trend similar to the overall incidence. In contrast, the incidence rate for mPCa demonstrated a continuous increase from 1.5 per 10 000 in 2010 to 2.4 per 10 000 in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of PCa has risen steadily over the last decade, despite fluctuations in nmPCa incidence. The concurrent rise in mPCa and nmPCa requires further study regarding the burden of localized and systemic treatment.

Local Prostate Radiation Therapy and Symptomatic Local Events in De Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Local prostate radiation therapy (LPRT) for low-burden metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) improves overall survival and is the standard of care. The role of LPRT in reducing symptomatic local events (SLE) remains unclear. We aimed to identify SLE risk factors and to evaluate the association between LPRT and SLE in mPCa. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients initially diagnosed with mPCa between 2005 and 2016 in a cancer registry. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were obtained from chart review and the cancer registry. The coprimary endpoints were genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) SLE, identified by physician billing claims between 2004 and 2017 for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures potentially related to GU and GI SLE. The effect of LPRT on SLE was evaluated using both recurrent event (Andersen-Gill model) and time-to-first-event sequential landmark analyses. Risk factors for SLE were assessed by multivariable Cox regression. LPRT was defined as ≥40 Gy within 1 year of diagnosis. Metastatic burden was defined per the STAMPEDE trial. RESULTS: Of 1363 patients, 46 (3.4%) received LPRT. Median follow-up was 27.3 and 28.9 months in the control and LPRT groups, respectively. LPRT was associated with less recurrent GU SLE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.67; P = .002), upper tract obstruction (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.84; P = .03), and cystoscopy (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.96; P = .04). Metastatic burden was not associated with SLE. CONCLUSIONS: LPRT in mPCa was associated with less recurrent GU SLE, specifically for upper tract obstruction and cystoscopy.

Predicting short- and long-term renal function following partial and radical nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To externally validate the previously published Mayo clinic model for the prediction of early (<30 days) postoperative renal failure, which relies solely on preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and develop a novel model for the prediction of long-term (>30 days) renal function after partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN), including patient factors and nephrometry scores. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, single-center cohort study on patients who underwent PN or RN for a unilateral renal tumor between 2003 and 2019 with a preoperative eGFR of at least 15 ml/min/1.73m2. Early postoperative renal failure was defined as eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 or receipt of dialysis within 30 days. We determined the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) to assess the Mayo clinic model's discriminative power. We used hierarchical linear mixed models with backward selection of candidate variables to develop a prediction model for long-term eGFR following PN and RN, separately. Their predictive ability was quantified using the marginal and conditional R2GLMM and an internal validation. RESULTS: We included 421 patients (7,548 eGFR observations) who underwent PN and 271 patients (6,530 eGFR observations) who underwent RN. The Mayo clinic model for prediction of early postoperative renal failure following PN and RN showed an AUC of 0.816 (95% CI 0.718-0.920) and 0.825 (95% CI 0.688-0.962), respectively. In multivariable models, long-term eGFR following PN was associated with age, diabetes, the presence of a solitary kidney, tumor diameter and preoperative eGFR, while long-term eGFR following RN was associated with age, body mass index, RENAL nephrometry score and preoperative eGFR. Marginal and conditional R2GLMM were 0.591 and 0.855 for the PN model, and 0.363 and 0.849 for the RN model, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo clinic model for short-term renal failure prediction showed good accuracy on external validation. Our long-term eGFR prediction models depend mostly on host factors as opposed to tumor complexity and can aid in decision-making when considering PN vs. RN.

Deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy (dCN) after upfront systemic therapy has been utilized in the management of select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Herein, we sought to review the current evidence and define oncologic and perioperative outcomes associated with deferred surgical management of newly diagnosed mRCC. Our objective was to critically evaluate the role of dCN in the targeted and immunotherapy eras, comparing oncologic and perioperative outcomes between dCN and upfront CN. Medline, OVID, and Scopus databases were searched for studies evaluating patients undergoing dCN following systemic therapy (ST). PRISMA guidelines were referenced and followed. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), percent of patients proceeding to dCN, reduction in primary tumor size, complication rates, and perioperative mortality. Random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing overall survival between dCN vs. ST alone and dCN vs. upfront CN. Nineteen studies were included to assess the primary outcomes. The percent of patients proceeding to planned dCN after planned pre-surgical ST ranged from 60.5% to 84%. The most common reason for not undergoing dCN was disease progression on upfront ST. Of patients undergoing dCN, 76% to 96% were able to resume ST postoperatively. OS and PFS ranged from 12.4 to 46 months and 4.5 to 11 months, respectively. Pooled results demonstrated significantly improved OS favoring dCN over upfront CN (hazard ratio, HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.45-0.69) and ST alone (HR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.38-0.53). Deferred CN represents a potential treatment option in appropriately selected patients with mRCC with a favorable response to upfront systemic therapy. Future randomized trials will be needed to clarify how much this is due to the surgery vs. patient selection.

A Comparison of Percutaneous Ablation Therapy to Partial Nephrectomy for cT1a Renal Cancers: Results from the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous ablation therapy (AT) and partial nephrectomy (PN) are successful management strategies for T1a renal cancer. Our objective was to compare AT to PN with respect to recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients post-PN or -AT for cT1aN0M0 renal cancer from 2011 to 2021 were identified from the national Canadian Kidney Cancer information system. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity score (PS) was used. The primary outcomes, RFS and OS, were compared using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test analyses and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients underwent AT and 2,001 underwent PN, with a median followup of 2.0 years (IQR 0.6-4.1). Covariates were well balanced between the AT and PN cohorts following PS matching. Two-year RFS following IPTW PS analysis for patients undergoing AT and PN was 88.1% and 97.4% (p <0.0001), respectively, while 2-year OS was 97.4% and 99.0% (p=0.7), respectively. Five-year RFS following IPTW PS analysis for patients undergoing AT and PN was 86.0% and 95.1%, respectively (p=0.003), while 5-year OS was 94.2% and 95.1%, respectively (p=0.9). Following IPTW PS analysis, treatment modality (PN vs AT) was a predictor of disease recurrence (HR 0.36, p=0.003) but not for OS (HR 0.96, p=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: With short followup, PN offers better RFS than AT, although no significant difference in OS was detected following PS adjustments. Both modalities can be offered to appropriately selected patients while we await prospective randomized data.

Split Renal Function Is Fundamentally Important for Predicting Functional Recovery After Radical Nephrectomy.

While partial nephrectomy (PN) is generally preferred for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), radical nephrectomy (RN) is occasionally required. A new-baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) >45 ml/min/1.73 m2 after kidney cancer surgery is associated with strong survival outcomes. If NBGFR after RN will be above this threshold and the tumor has increased oncologic potential, RN may be a relevant consideration. Predicting NBGFR, defined as the GFR at 3-12 mo after RN, has been challenging owing to omission of two important parameters: split renal function (SRF) and renal function compensation (RFC). Our objective was to evaluate a simple SRF-based model in comparison to five published non-SRF-based models using data from a retrospective cohort of 445 RN patients. SRF was obtained via readily available semiautomated software (FUJIFILM Medical Systems) that provides differential parenchymal volume analysis on the basis of preoperative imaging. Our conceptually simple and clinically implementable SRF-based model more accurately predicts NBGFR after RN than five published non-SRF-based models (all p < 0.01). The SRF-based model also improved prediction of the clinically relevant threshold of NBGFR >45 ml/min/1.73 m2 (all p < 0.05). Patient summary: We validated a novel approach for more accurate prediction of kidney function after removal of one kidney. Our approach can be used in clinical and practice and will help in making decisions on full or partial removal of a kidney for kidney cancer.

Ultrasound Correlates Highly With Cross Sectional Imaging for Small Renal Masses in a Contemporary Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between ultrasound (US), cross-sectional imaging, and pathological renal mass sizes. METHODS: Between January 2011 and January 2021, a cohort of patients from 14 academic institutions who had an US and cross-sectional imaging within 8 weeks of each other and within 6 months of surgery were identified. A second cohort of patients with small renal masses (≤4 cm) who had US and cross-sectional imaging within 8 weeks of each other were also examined, regardless of their treatment modality. Correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and sensitivity tables were generated. RESULTS: A total of 1464 patients were included in the surgical cohort and 1582 patients (1921 imaging pairs) were included in the small renal mass (SRM) cohort. Pearson correlation coefficients between computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathologic size was 0.93 (P <.0001) and between US and pathological size was 0.90 (P <.0001). The correlation between US and CT/MRI was 0.93 (P <.0001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a greater agreement for smaller renal masses. For the SRM cohort when comparing US to CT/MRI, 1441 (75%) SRM measurements were within 0.5 cm and only 149 (7.8%) were greater than 1 cm in difference. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that correlation between US and CT/MRI for SRMs were higher in patients with lower body mass index. CONCLUSION: There is a strong correlation between US and cross-sectional imaging in 75% of patients at baseline imaging. Our study provides support for utilization of US for active surveillance.

Outcomes following cytoreductive nephrectomy without immediate postoperative systemic therapy for patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: While the recent CARMENA trial evaluated upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) among patients treated with immediate subsequent systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the role of CN in patients not immediately requiring systemic therapy remains to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To describe the oncologic outcomes of patients with de-novo synchronous mRCC who underwent CN +/- metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and subsequent surveillance without planned immediate post-CN systemic therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Adults who underwent CN for unilateral, sporadic mRCC between 1996 and 2016 without immediate postoperative systemic therapy were identified using the prospectively-maintained Mayo Clinic Nephrectomy Registry. Co-primary outcomes were survival free of systemic therapy or death and overall-survival. RESULTS: Of 156 patients who met inclusion criteria for study, 37 (24%) patients were managed after CN with surveillance alone and 119 (76%) underwent MDT. Seventy-two patients ultimately initiated systemic therapy at a median of 0.7 years (IQR 0.3-1.7). Median follow-up among survivors was 6.2 years (IQR 4.4-9.5), during which time 133 patients died. At 1, 3, and 5 years, survival free of systemic therapy or death rates were 47%, 21% and 14% and overall-survival rates were 69%, 37%, and 28%. CONCLUSION: Among carefully selected patients managed with surveillance after CN +/- MDT, approximately half may avoid systemic therapy for 1 year, with a subset achieving long-term survival free of systemic therapy or death. Having a single metastatic site and disease amenable to complete metastasectomy are features of patients who might be well served with upfront CN +/- MDT.

The Comparative Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy versus Radiotherapy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Longitudinal, Population-Based Analysis.

PURPOSE: The comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer remains a largely debated topic. Utilizing a provincial population-based linked data set from an equal-access, universal health care system, we sought to compare outcomes among patients treated with either radiation or prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study by linking several administrative data sets to identify patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2016 in Manitoba, Canada and who were subsequently treated with either RP or RT. Cox proportional hazard models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to compare rates of all-cause mortality, as well as prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) between patients who underwent RP vs RT. RESULTS: During the study period, 2,540 patients underwent RP and 1,895 underwent RT for prostate cancer. Unadjusted overall survival was higher for RP vs RT (5-year overall survival 95.52% for RP compared with 84.55% for RT, p <0.0001). In inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analysis, compared to patients in the RP groups, patients in the RT group had an increased rate of all-cause mortality (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.65-2.26, p <0.0001), and PCSM (HR 3.98, 95% CI 2.89-5.49; p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RT was associated with higher all-cause mortality and PCSM rates compared with RP. These findings highlight the importance of comparative effectiveness research to identify treatment disparities and warrant further investigation.

Utilization and outcomes of metastasectomy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: An analysis of the national cancer database.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of oligometastatic disease has been shown to be associated with an improved survival in other malignancies, though its role is not established in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). We sought to examine utilization trends of metastasectomy in mUC and associated outcomes using the NCDB database. METHODS: We queried the NCDB from 2004 to 2016 for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had undergone metastasectomy. The annual utilization trend of metastasectomy was evaluated by linear regression. We compared overall survival (OS) between propensity score matched patients who had undergone metastasectomy and those who had not using two-sided log-rank and Cox regression models. We also performed sensitivity analyses on subcohorts of mUC. RESULTS: The utilization rate of metastasectomy in mUC was 7% and did not change significantly over time. Patients who received metastasectomy on average were younger, had >cT3 disease, had radical surgery to the primary tumor, and received systemic therapy. After propensity score matching, metastasectomy was not associated with an OS benefit for mUC patients (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.07; P=0.38). Stratified subgroup analysis based on systemic therapy, radical surgery to primary tumor, clinical N stage, and primary location of disease did not show an OS benefit of metastasectomy. CONCLUSION: Metastasectomy is uncommonly used, though utilization has persisted over more than a decade. Despite selection biases and residual confounding favoring patients undergoing metastasectomy, we found similar OS among these individuals and those who did not undergo metastasectomy.