Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Emerg Med ; 15(1): 9, 2022 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35240983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibody (MCA) therapies have been utilized under emergency use authorization (EUA) for high-risk pediatric patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the outpatient setting since late 2019. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of MCA therapy in pediatric patients in the pediatric emergency department (ED) at a large community hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of high-risk pediatric patients 12 to 17 years of age who received MCA therapy in the pediatric ED between December 8, 2020 and June 3, 2021. The primary outcome was to describe the patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and safety profile of the pediatric population that received MCA therapy. The secondary outcome was to describe the incidence of hospitalizations or ED visits up to 28 days following therapy. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included in the analysis. The median number of days of symptoms was 4 with 41% of patients having symptoms between 0 and 3 days at time of MCA administration. Only one patient experienced a mild adverse event that did not require epinephrine administration. Two patients returned to the ED for reevaluation during the study follow-up period. No patients required admission within 28 days post-therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of MCA therapy in high-risk pediatric patients in the pediatric ED was well-tolerated with subjective improvement noted in COVID-19 symptoms post-therapy. Further studies are necessary to determine the role MCA therapy may play in reducing morbidity from COVID-19 infection in high-risk pediatric patients.

2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 437-441, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34487951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recombinant monoclonal antibody therapies have been utilized under emergency use authorization (EUA) for the prevention of clinical decompensation in high-risk COVID-19 positive patients for up to 10 days from symptom onset. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the timing of the monoclonal antibody, bamlanivimab, on clinical outcomes in high-risk COVID-19 positive patients. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved, retrospective evaluation of adult patients who received bamlanivimab per EUA criteria in the emergency department (ED). Patients were dichotomized into two groups- 3 days of symptoms or less (early) versus 4 to 10 days (late). The primary outcome was hospitalization for COVID-related illness at 28 days (or treatment failure). Secondary outcomes were COVID-related ED visits at 28 days, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality at 28 days. RESULTS: A total of 839 patients were included in the analysis. There was no difference observed in COVID-related hospitalization rates within 28 days between the early and late bamlanivimab administration groups (7.5% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.71). There was no difference in COVID-related ED visits within 28 days with 13% of patients returning to the ED. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, there were no differences in the rates of hospitalization at 28 days when bamlanivimab was administered in the first 3 days of illness versus days 4 to 10. Future prospective studies are warranted to expand upon the characteristics of patients that may or may not benefit from monoclonal antibody therapy.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Neutralizing/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Patient Readmission , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Drug Administration Schedule , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Cureus ; 13(12): e20200, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35004021

ABSTRACT

An 11-year-old male presented to the pediatric emergency department with a one-day history of peri-umbilical pain with nausea, anorexia, and scant vomiting. On examination, he had moderate tenderness in the right upper quadrant with moderate guarding and rebound tenderness. Imaging showed concern for early acute appendicitis. The patient was admitted and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Despite the appendectomy, the patient continued to have fevers and abdominal pain. Four days after the initial presentation, the patient decompensated and was diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome. This case is interesting because the patient never met diagnostic criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) prior to his decompensation. If a patient's symptoms continue or worsen despite seemingly appropriate management, the patient must be reassessed for other causes of pathology. Surgeons must have a high index of suspicion for MIS-C in patients with recent COVID-19 diagnoses, and this case demonstrates that MIS-C can present in phases and not all at once.

4.
J Asthma ; 54(5): 498-503, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27715361

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although pediatric asthma continues to be a highly studied disease, data to suggest clear strategies to decrease asthma related revisits or readmissions is lacking. The purpose of our study was to assess the effect of emergency department (ED) direct dispensing of beta-agonist metered dose inhalers on pediatric asthma ED revisit and readmission rates. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients discharged from the pediatric ED with a diagnosis of asthma. Our primary outcome measured the rate of asthma revisits to the ED or admissions to the hospital within 28 days. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess ED beta-agonist MDI dispensing and revisit and/or readmission as the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 853 patients met eligibility for inclusion in the study, with 657 enrolled in the Baseline group and 196 enrolled in the ED-MDI group. The Baseline group experienced a revisit and readmission rate of 7.0% (46/657) versus 2.6% (5/196) in the ED-MDI group, (p = 0.026). ED direct dispensing of MDIs was found to be independently associated with a decreased risk of revisit or readmission (odds ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, ED direct dispensing of beta-agonist MDIs resulted in a reduction in 28-day revisit and readmission to the hospital. Further studies should be performed to evaluate the economic impact of reducing these revisits and readmissions against the costs of maintaining a dispensing program. Our findings may support modification of asthma programs to include dispensing MDIs from the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Albuterol/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Albuterol/administration & dosage , Asthma/diagnosis , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Metered Dose Inhalers , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...