Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 237: 115943, 2024 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39236378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Blunt aortic injury (BAI) is relatively uncommon in the pediatric population. The goal of this study was to examine the management of BAI in both children and adolescents, using a large national dataset. METHODS: Patients (1-19 years of age) with BAI were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database over 14-years. Patients were stratified by age group (children [ages 1-9] and adolescents [ages 10-19]) and compared. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of mortality in adolescents with BAI. RESULTS: Adolescents undergoing TEVAR had similar morbidity (16.8 vs 12.6 â€‹%, p â€‹= â€‹0.057) and significantly reduced mortality (2.1 vs 14.4 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.0001) compared to those adolescents managed non-operatively. MLR identified use of TEVAR as the only modifiable risk factor significantly associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.138; 95%CI 0.059-0.324, p â€‹< â€‹0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: BAI leads to significant morbidity and mortality for both children and adolescents. For pediatric patients with BAI, children may be safely managed non-operatively, while an endovascular repair may improve outcomes for adolescents.


Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Adolescent , Female , Male , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult , Aorta/injuries , Aorta/surgery , Vascular System Injuries/surgery , Vascular System Injuries/mortality , Risk Factors
2.
Am J Surg ; 238: 115836, 2024 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39163763

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine the association between the injury mechanism and repair type with outcomes in patients with traumatic inferior vena cava injuries. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the ACS-TQIP database (2017-2020), including patients with traumatic IVC injuries. Patients were stratified by injury mechanism and type of repair and compared. RESULTS: Out of 1334 patients, 5 â€‹% underwent endovascular repair while 95 â€‹% had an open procedure. Overall, 74.7 â€‹% sustained a penetrating injury. On multivariable regression analysis, the type of repair was not associated with mortality and morbidity for patients with penetrating injuries. However, among patients with blunt injuries, endovascular repair was associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR:0.35, p â€‹= â€‹0.020) and non-venous thromboembolism (VTE) morbidity (aOR:0.41, p â€‹= â€‹0.015), and higher odds of VTE complications (aOR:6.74, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the type of repair did not impact morbidity and mortality in patients with penetrating injuries, endovascular repair was identified as the only modifiable predictor of reduced non-VTE morbidity and mortality in patients with blunt injuries.

3.
Am J Surg ; 224(5): 1308-1313, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35778232

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the impact of pre-injury anticoagulant use on outcomes of isolated blunt abdominal SOI patients who underwent NOM. METHODS: A 1-year(2017) analysis of the ACS-TQIP. We included all ≥18yrs trauma patients with isolated blunt abdominal-SOI who underwent NOM. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their history of pre-injury anticoagulant use. Propensity score matching was performed. RESULTS: A matched cohort of 2709 patients (AC, 903; No-AC,1806) was analyzed. Compared to the No-AC group, the AC group had higher rates of failure of NOM(2.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.03), cardiac arrest (1.2%vs. 3.1%, p = 0.02), acute kidney injury (2.4% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.01), myocardial infarction (0.6% vs. 1.4%,p = 0.03), and mortality (5.1%vs. 7.6%,p = 0.01), and longer hospital LOS (17[10-24]vs.17[12-26]days,p = 0.04) and ICU LOS (11[6-17]vs.11[7-18]days,p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Among nonoperatively managed blunt abdominal SOI patients, preinjury use of anticoagulants negatively impacts outcomes. Extra surveillance is required while managing patients with blunt abdominal SOI on pre-injury anticoagulants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic/care management.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Spleen/injuries , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Injury Severity Score
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL