Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of colposcopy in the diagnosis of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+).

BACKGROUND: Colposcopy is a tool for triaging screen positive women regardless of method used for cervical cancer screening. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of colposcopy in the diagnosis of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN 2+) at Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital (JDWNRH), Thimphu, Bhutan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2021 to August 2021 among 299 women who availed colposcopy services at the colposcopy clinic of JDWNRH, Bhutan. Women included in this study were either screen positive (Pap smear) or were suspected to have invasive cancer; they underwent colposcopy and a cervical biopsy irrespective of colposcopy impression. This histopathologic assessment was considered as the gold standard test for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or invasive cancer. RESULTS: The mean age of the study participants was 43 years (ranges, 25-76 years). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of senior colposcopists to diagnose histologic CIN 2+ were 80.0% (95% CI 59.30, 93.17), 71.07% (95% CI 62.13, 78.95), and 72.60% (95% CI 64.61, 79.65), and for junior colposcopists were 59.46% (95% CI 42.10, 75.25), 76.72% (95% CI 67.97, 84.04), and 72.55% (95% CI 64.76, 79.45) respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of colposcopy to diagnose histologic CIN 2+ were 66.67% (95% CI 53.66, 78.05), 73.73% (95% CI 67.63, 79.23), and 72.24% (95% CI 66.79, 77.24) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the senior and junior colposcopists had a comparable colposcopic accuracy to diagnose histologic CIN 2+, whereas senior had a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity than junior colposcopists.

Clinicopathological profile of adnexal masses presenting to a tertiary-care hospital in Bhutan.

CONTEXT: Adnexal masses of ovarian origin are of growing concern due to high fatality associated with ovarian malignancy because they are diagnosed at advanced stage due to vague symptoms and absence of recommended screening tests. AIMS: The aim was to study the prevalence of histopathologic types of adnexal masses in different age groups and to analyze the accuracy of preoperative evaluation in diagnosing ovarian malignancy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a tertiary care hospital in Bhutan with gynecologic-oncology services, from January to December 2017. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Women presenting with adnexal mass were evaluated and those meeting criteria were enrolled. They were evaluated preoperatively with complete history, examination, ultrasound, and tumor markers. Risk of malignancy index (RMI) was calculated for all patients. Following surgery, histopathology results were compared with preoperative evaluation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test, t-test, Cohen's Kappa, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 165 patients evaluated, 127 fulfilling criteria were enrolled. Adnexal masses of ovarian origin were most common (n = 102, 80.3%), of which 12.7% were malignant. Epithelial ovarian malignancy was the most common malignant ovarian tumor, serous cystadenocarcinoma being the most common. Malignancy was significantly more in older, postmenopausal women with high RMI. Seven out of 11 women with high RMI were diagnosed in Stage 3 or 4. RMI score at cutoff of 200 was 54.6% sensitive and 85.7% specific. CONCLUSIONS: Adnexal mass of ovarian origin was the most common. Malignancy was significantly more in older, postmenopausal women with high RMI. RMI showed moderate correlation in diagnosing epithelial ovarian malignancies.