Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(25): e34072, 2023 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37352080

ABSTRACT

Visceral obesity is an important factor that increases the risk of complications after colorectal cancer surgery. As calculating visceral fat is difficult and time-consuming, more practical fat measurements that are not time-consuming have been introduced. This study aimed to investigate the effects of perirenal fat thickness on postoperative complications and prognosis in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Perirenal fat thickness was measured from the dorsal aspect of the left kidney on preoperative computerized tomography of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. The effects of perirenal fat thickness on postoperative complications were investigated. Diagnostic test performance was examined using the Roc Curve test to determine the cutoff value for the perirenal fat thickness values according to the complication findings of the patients. The cutoff value of perirenal fat thickness was found to be above 25.1, according to the presence of complications in the patients. Those with a perirenal fat thickness greater than 25.1 mm were considered to have high perirenal fat thickness values, and those with a low perirenal fat thickness value were considered low. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased perirenal fat thickness is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. We believe that perirenal fat thickness measurement, as an indicator of visceral fat volume, can be used to identify patients at high risk of developing complications after colorectal cancer surgery. This may change the disease management and affect the patient information process.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Intra-Abdominal Fat , Humans , Intra-Abdominal Fat/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Kidney , Risk Factors , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies
2.
Chemosens Percept ; 15(2): 135-144, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36247977

ABSTRACT

Introduction: COVID-19 infection develops neurologic symptoms such as smell and taste loss. We aimed to determine the volumetric changes in the brain and correlation of possible related biochemical parameters and endocannabinoid levels after COVID-19 recovery. Methods: Brain magnetic resonance images of recovered COVID-19 patients and healthy volunteers, whose olfactory and gustatory scores were obtained through a questionnaire, were taken, and the volumes of the brain regions associated with taste and smell were measured by automatic and semiautomatic methods. Endocannabinoids (EC), which are critical in the olfactory system, and vitamin B12, zinc, iron, ferritin, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and thyroxine (T4) levels, which are reported to have possible roles in olfactory disorders, were measured in peripheral blood. Results: Taste and smell disorder scores and EC levels were found to be higher in recovered COVID-19 patients compared to controls. EC levels were negatively correlated with bilateral entorhinal cortex (ENT) volumes in the COVID-19 group. Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex volumes showed correlations with gustatory complaints and ferritin in recovered COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: The critical finding of our study is the high EC levels and negative correlation between EC levels and left ENT volumes in recovered COVID-19 patients. Implications: It is possible that ECs are potential neuromodulators in many conditions leading to olfactory disorders, including COVID-19.

3.
Cureus ; 12(1): e6740, 2020 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32133262

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:  Two different methods for fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules (multi-pass conventional smear, MPCS; single-pass liquid-based cytology, SPLBC) were evaluated regarding the magnitude of nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory sampling ratio, and basic demographic and ultrasonographic (USG) factors to predict such outcome. METHODS:  One thousand FNAB patients were retrospectively assessed. Of them, 517 nodules were evaluated with the conventional smear method, and the rest were evaluated with liquid-based cytology method using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. FNAB technique had certain procedural differences for both pathological methods. For conventional smear, a modified "needle-only" technique with three independent passes was performed, whereas a single pass was used for liquid-based cytology. The reduction of nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory results constituted the basis of this study. Pathological results, therefore, were subgrouped under "nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory" (Category I), "benign" (Category II), and "atypia/neoplasia/malignancy" (Category III-VI). RESULTS:  Both FNAB groups were not statistically different or only slightly different regarding size (P = 0.196), echogenicity (P = 0.014), and the presence of echogenic foci (P = 0.11), therefore considered to have equal USG properties. In MPCS method, the nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory rate (i.e., Category I) was 24%. Other cytological results were as follows: Category II (67.1%), Category III-VI (8.8%). In SPLBC method, the nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory rate (i.e., Category I) was 14.5%. Other cytological results were as follows: Category II (77.6%), Category III-VI (7.8%). A significant difference was found between two sampling methods regarding pathological results (Independent samples t-test, P < 0.0001). The demographic and USG factors, considered in this study, did not offer a successful prediction of nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory outcomes. CONCLUSION:  SPLBC has significantly lower (14.5% vs 24%) nondiagnostic rate than MPCS, and higher 77.6% vs 67.1%) Category II rate than MPCS. This may point to the possibility that MPCS method undercategorizes many benign (i.e., Category II) nodules under nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory category. The success of the former is due to the elimination of confounding material during the process. Single pass, also, increases patient comfort and compliance, and has additional advantages for the interventionalist, as it obviates the need to smear aspirates. This dramatically decreases the actual duration of the biopsy procedure and is free of interventionalist expertise for smearing.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...