Results of an open-access lung cancer screening program with low-dose computed tomography: the Gdansk experience.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is one of the most promising tools for reducing mortality from lung cancer. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of an open-access lung cancer screening program with LDCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 8649 asymptomatic volunteers between 50 and 75 years of age with a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years underwent LDCT screening. The presence of lung nodules with a diameter of less than 5 mm required a follow-up control visit after 12 months, and with a diameter of 5 to 10 mm--after 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients with a nodule of more than 10 mm in diameter required further diagnostic workup. RESULTS: Lung nodules were detected in 4694 individuals (54%). Lung cancer was diagnosed in 107 patients (1.24%). Of 8649 participants, 300 (3.5%) were referred for further diagnostic workup, and 125 (1.5%) underwent surgical resection (81 because of malignant lesions; 44, benign lesions). Eighty-one participants (75%) underwent surgery with a curative intent, and 26 participants underwent oncological treatment. There were no perioperative deaths. The majority of surgical patients underwent lobectomy (video-assisted, in 30 patients; and open, in 38 patients). Stage I non-small cell lung cancer was detected in 64 of the surgical patients (79%). CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of lung cancer in the screening program with low-dose computed tomography is relatively low but patients were diagnosed at a very early stage of the disease compared with standard clinical practice.

The influence of selected factors on the attendance of the high-risk population in the early lung cancer detection program.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, killing almost 22,000 people in Poland every year. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is the most promising tool of secondary prophylaxis leading to early detection and thus successful treatment of this malignancy. Knowledge about socio-demographic factors that affect participation in lung cancer early detection programs is essential for the future design and implementation of such programs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among the 8649 participants of the Pomeranian Lung Cancer Screening Program (PLCSP), 1619 individuals responded to a questionnaire that had been designed to assess socio-demographic data of participants at high risk of developing lung cancer. The survey was conducted on-site after reception of results by the program participants. RESULTS: Among the survey participants, 777 (48%) were current cigarette smokers. The majority of them represented low or medium level of wealth status. The respondents positively evaluated the promotional campaign during the PLCSP, although 43% of them indicated family and friends as a source of information about the program. As the most important action that stimulated the participation, 46% of the respondents indicated the awareness campaign involving a celebrity, and 45% of them indicated the presence of cancer in the family. The influence of healthcare employees on the participation in the screening program was minimal. More than half of the respondents (53%) declared a willingness to co-finance a similar prophylactic program in the future in an amount not exceeding 100 PLN. CONCLUSIONS: An effective promotional campaign in the media, the influence of family and a campaign involving a celebrity promoted attendance at the screening program. The influence of healthcare employees on the participation in the program was minimal. The majority of the screened population declared a willingness to actively participate in the costs of LDCT examination.

Diagnostic work-up and surgery in participants of the Gdansk lung cancer screening programme: the incidence of surgery for non-malignant conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening improves lung cancer prognosis but also results in diagnostic work-up and surgical treatment in many individuals without cancer. Therefore, we analysed the procedures that screening participants underwent to better understand the extent of overdiagnosis. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011, 8649 healthy volunteers aged 50-75 years with a 20 pack-year smoking history underwent LDCT screening, of whom individuals with detected lung nodules had 2 years control. Participants with a nodule >10 mm in diameter or with suspected tumour morphology underwent diagnostic work-up: 283 (6%)/4694 (54%) screened participants had detected lung nodules. One hundred and four individuals underwent surgery, 27 underwent oncological treatment and 152 without a cancer diagnosis underwent further follow-up with LDCT. RESULTS: In 75% of participants accepted for diagnostic work-up and 25% of surgical patients, the procedures were unnecessary. In 70 (24.7%) participants, a specific diagnosis was obtained mainly due to the low efficacy of fine needle aspiration biopsy [sensitivity, 65.2%; negative predictive value (NPV), 95.9%] and bronchofiberoscopy (sensitivity, 71.4%; NPV, 50%) caused by overinterpretation of LDCT [positive predictive value (PPV), 2%]. Of 104 (36.7%) surgical patients, 43 (41.4%) had a preoperative cancer diagnosis, and 61 (58.6%) underwent surgery without pathological examination. In the latter group, intervention was justified in 35 (57.3%) patients. Complications occurred in 49 (17.3%) participants subjected to diagnostic work-up. In surgical patients, 67 (64.4%) malignant and 37 (35.6%) benign lesions were resected. In the latter group, intervention was justified in only 11 (29.7%) patients. No patient died because of diagnostic or treatment procedures during the study. The complication rate was 14.5% in the malignant and 10.8% in the benign groups. A neoplasm was found in 94 screening participants, of whom 67 (71.3%) underwent surgery; the remaining 27 (28.7%) patients were not surgical candidates. Adenocarcinoma accounted for 49/67 (73%) patients who underwent surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); 56/67 (84%) patients had stage I NSCLC, and 26/67 (38%) underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Futile diagnostic work-ups and operations must be reduced before LDCT screening can be broadly used. Stage I adenocarcinoma dominated in the NSCLC patients who underwent surgery.