Optimal interlesion distance for 90 and 50†watt radiofrequency applications with low ablation index values: experimental findings in a chronic ovine model.

AIMS: The optimal interlesion distance (ILD) for 90 and 50 W radiofrequency applications with low ablation index (AI) values in the atria has not been established. Excessive ILDs can predispose to interlesion gaps, whereas restrictive ILDs can predispose to procedural complications. The present study sought, therefore, to experimentally determine the optimal ILD for 90 W-4 s and 50 W applications with low AI values to optimize catheter ablation outcomes in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: Posterior intercaval lines were created in eight adult sheep using CARTO and the QDOT-MICRO catheter in a temperature-controlled mode. In four animals, the lines were created with 50 W applications, a target AI value ≥350, and ILDs of 6, 5, 4, and 3 mm, respectively. In the other four animals, the lines were created with 90 W-4 s applications and ILDs of 6, 5, 4, and 3 mm, respectively. Activation maps were created immediately after ablation and at 21 days to assess linear block prior to gross and histological analyses. All eight lines appeared transmural and continuous on histology. However, for 50 W-only applications with an ILD of 3 mm resulted in durable linear electrical block, whereas for 90 W applications, only the lines with ILDs of 4 and 3 mm were blocked. No complications were detected during ablation procedures, but all power and ILD combinations except 50 W-6 mm resulted in asymptomatic shallow lung lesions. CONCLUSION: In the intercaval region in sheep, for 50 W applications with an AI value of ∼370, the optimal ILD is 3 mm, whereas for 90 W-4 s applications, the optimal ILD is 3-4 mm.

[Benefits and harms of cannabis-based medicines from the viewpoint of patients with chronic pain and their physicians : A cohort study in three pain centers of the German federal state Saarland]. / Nutzen und Schaden von Cannabisarzneimitteln aus Sicht von Patienten mit chronischen Schmerzen und ihren Ärzten : Eine Kohortenstudie in drei saarländischen Schmerzzentren.

BACKGROUND: There are no studies available that have simultaneously assessed the benefits and harms of cannabis-based medicines from the viewpoint of patients and their physicians. METHODS: All chronic pain patients at three pain centres in the German federal state of Saarland who had received at least one prescription of cannabis-based medicines (CbMs) in the past from the study centre were included in a cross-sectional study from January 1 to December 31, 2021. Patients and their physicians completed a self-developed questionnaire separately. RESULTS: All 187 contacted patients participated in the study. Since the start of CbM therapy, 44.9% of patients reported to be much or very much, 43.3% to be moderately and 8.0% to be slightly improved overall. A total of 2.7% reported no change and 1.1% a moderate deterioration of overall wellbeing. From the patients' point of view, the symptoms most frequently reported to have substantially improved were sleep problems (36.4%), muscle tension (25.1%) and appetite problems (22.1%). The most frequent bothersome side effects were sweating (6.4%), concentration problems (4.2%) and nausea (4.1%). Physicians noted substantial pain relief in 60.7%, improvement of sleep in 65.7% and of mental well-being in 34.3%. A complete cessation of opioids was achieved in 64.7%, of anticonvulsants in 57.9% and of antidepressants in 60% of patients that had received these medications before the start of CbM therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CbMs can contribute to a clinically relevant reduction in pain, sleep problems and muscle tension and can improve daily functioning in carefully selected and supervised patients with chronic pain. CbM can contribute to the reduction or complete cessation of other pain medications (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids).

Cannabis use disorder in patients with chronic pain: overestimation and underestimation in a cross-sectional observational study in 3 German pain management centres.

ABSTRACT: There are concerns that cannabis use disorder (CUD) may develop in patients with chronic pain prescribed medical cannabis (MC). The criteria for CUD according to the Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders Version 5 (DSM-5) were not developed for the identification of patients using cannabis for therapeutic reasons. In addition, some items of CUD might be attributed to the desire of the patient to relieve the pain. Therefore, alternative strategies are needed to identify the true prevalence of CUD in persons with chronic pain being treated with MC. The prevalence of CUD in patients with chronic pain according to the DSM-5 criteria was assessed using an anonymous questionnaire in 187 consecutive patients attending 3 German pain centres in 2021. Questionnaires were rated as follows: (1) all criteria included, (2) removal of items addressing tolerance and withdrawal, and (3) removal of positive items if associated with the desire to relieve pain. Abuse was assessed by self-report (use of illegal drugs and diversion and illegal acquisition of MC) and urine tests for illegal drugs. Physicians recorded any observation of abuse. Cannabis use disorder according to the DSM-5 criteria was present in 29.9%, in 13.9% when items of tolerance and withdrawal were removed, and in 2.1% when positive behaviour items were removed. In 10.7%, at least 1 signal of abuse was noted. Urine tests were positive for nonprescribed drugs (amphetamines and tranquilizer) in 4.8% of subjects. Physicians identified abuse in 1 patient. In this study, the DSM-5 criteria overestimated and physicians underestimated the prevalence of CUD in patients prescribed MC for chronic pain.

Long-term observational studies with cannabis-based medicines for chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of cannabis-based medicines (CbMs) for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in long-term observational studies. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: CENTRAL, EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched until December 2021. We included prospective observational studies with a study duration ≥26 weeks. Pooled estimates of event rates of categorical data and standardized mean differences (SMD) of continuous variables were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: Six studies were included with 2686 participants, with study duration ranging between 26 and 52 weeks. Pain conditions included nociceptive, nociplastic, neuropathic and mixed pain mechanisms. The certainty of evidence for every outcome was very low. The weighted mean difference of mean pain reduction was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 2.78) on a 0-10 scale. 20.8% (95% CI 10.2% to 34.0%) of patients reported pain relief of 50% or greater. The effect size for sleep problems was moderate and for depression and anxiety was low. Study completions was reported for 53.3% (95% CI 26.8% to 79.9%) of patients, with dropouts of 6.8% (95% CI 4.3% to 9.7%) due to adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred in 3.0% (95 CI 0.02% to 12.8%) and 0.3% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.6%) of patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Information included in observational studies should be regarded with caution. Within the context of observational studies. CbMs had positive effects on multiple symptoms for some CNCP patients and were generally well tolerated and safe. SIGNIFICANCE: There is very low quality evidence for the long-term effectiveness (pain, sleep, mood, health-related quality of life), tolerability and safety of medical cannabis for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) according to reports of prospective observational studies. Predefined criteria of a large magnitude of effect size in these types of studies were not met. Nevertheless, long-term medical cannabis therapy can be considered in some carefully selected and monitored patients with CNCP.

[Progressive muscle relaxation in postoperative pain therapy]. / Progressive Muskelrelaxation in der postoperativen Schmerztherapie.

BACKGROUND: Early and optimal treatment of postoperative pain based on a multimodal treatment concept is very important so that subsequent chronification can be avoided. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the influence of progressive muscle relaxation on the sensation of pain and the need for analgesics after orthopedic interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nonrandomized pilot study tested 104 patients in the Clinic of Orthopedics at the Saarland University Medical Center in Homburg, Germany. The patients underwent total endoprosthesis (TEP) of the or the knee or spine surgery (laminectomy), and they had the option of choosing to use the technique of progressive muscle relaxation. All patients completed a questionnaire on the first, fourth, and ninth postoperative day. Data were collected on the maximum and minimum intensity of pain, duration of strong pain, length of hospital stay, and use of pain medication. These were compared by means of t tests for the group with progressive muscle relaxation and the group without progressive muscle relaxation. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding pain sensation analgesic dosage. There was a tendency for the length of hospital stay to be shorter in the group with progressive muscle relaxation. CONCLUSION: The positive effect of progressive muscle relaxation cannot be confirmed on the basis of the study data. Owing to the varying study design and implementation as well as the inclusion of heterogeneous patient groups, no conclusion can be drawn at present regarding the effectiveness of progressive muscle relaxation in common practice; therefore, further research is necessary.

Efficacy and harms of long-term opioid therapy in chronic non-cancer pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis of open-label extension trials with a study duration ≥26 weeks.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This updated systematic review evaluated the efficacy, acceptability and safety of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: Clinicaltrials.gov, CENTRAL and MEDLINE until June 2019. We included open-label extension trials with a study duration ≥26 weeks of RCTs with ≥2 weeks duration. Pooled estimates of event rates of categorical data and standardized mean differences (SMD) of continuous variables were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: We added four new studies with 1,154 participants for a total of 15 studies with 3,590 participants. Study duration ranged between 26 and 156 weeks. Studies included patients with low back, osteoarthritis and neuropathic pain. The quality of evidence for every outcome was very low. 31.1% (95% Confidence interval [CI] 23.0%-40.7%) of patients randomized at baseline finished the open label period. 14.1% (95% CI 10.9%-19.4%) of patients dropped out to due adverse events. In 6.3% (95 CI 3.9%-10.1%) of patients serious adverse events and in 2.7% (95% CI 1.5%-4.7%) aberrant drug behaviour were noted. 0.5% (95% CI 0.2%-1.4%) of patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of open-label extension studies, opioids maintain reduction of pain and disability and are rather well tolerated and safe. LTOT can be considered in carefully selected and monitored patients with low back, osteoarthritis and neuropathic pain who experience a clinically meaningful pain reduction with at least tolerable adverse events in short-term opioid therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: There is very low quality evidence of the long-term efficacy, tolerability and safety of opioids for chronic low back, osteoarthritis and diabetic polyneuropathic pain within the context of open-label extension studies of randomized controlled trials. Drop out rate due to adverse events and deaths increase with study duration. One-third of patients profit from LTOT. Long-term opioid therapy can be considered in some carefully selected and monitored patients.

[Cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain: indications, selection of drugs, effectiveness and safety : Experiences of pain physicians in Saarland]. / Cannabispräparate bei chronischen Schmerzen: Indikationen, Präparateauswahl, Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit : Erfahrungen der saarländischen Schmerztherapeuten.

BACKGROUND: There are uncertainties among physicians with respect to the indications, selection of drugs, effectiveness and safety of cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain. METHODS: All statutory health insurance pain physicians in Saarland were asked to complete a self-developed questionnaire assessing their experiences with cannabis-based medicines, which they prescribed between 10 March 2017 and 30 November 2018 for adult patients with chronic cancer and non-cancer pain. RESULTS: All statutory health insurance pain physicians participated in the survey and 13 out of 20 reported having prescribed cannabis-based medicines. The most frequent reasons for prescriptions in 136 patients (1.9% of the patients of the institutions) were failure of established treatment (73%) and desire of the patient (63%). In 35% of patients the type of pain was nociceptive, in 34% neuropathic, in 29% nociceptive and neuropathic and in 13% nociplastic. Dronabinol was prescribed for 95% of the patients and 71% were responders (clinically relevant reduction of pain or of other symptoms). In 29% of patients treatment was terminated due to either a lack of efficacy or adverse events. CONCLUSION: Statutory health insurance pain physicians in Saarland were reluctant to prescribe cannabis-based medicines. Dronabinol was effective and well-tolerated in the majority of the highly selected patients.

Oh Schmerz lass nach - ein kurzer Report der ersten Ergebnisse unserer interdisziplinären, integrativen, gynäkologischen Schmerzsprechstunde.

Einleitung: Trotz immer besserer medizinischer und operativer Therapiemaßnahmen bleibt eine adäquate Schmerztherapie für viele gynäkologische Krankheitsbilder eine He-rausforderung. Neue patientenfokussierte Testsysteme können dabei zur Verlaufsbeurteilung und Therapieoptimierung beitragen. Ziel war es, die Pilot-Ergebnisse unserer, in Deutschland einmaligen, interdisziplinären, universitär geführten, integrativen Schmerzsprechstunde anhand neu-ester patientenfokussierter Testsysteme auszuwerten und zur weitergehenden interkollegialen Diskussion vorzustellen. Materialien und Methoden: Retrospektive, monozentrische Analyse der Behandlungsverläufe von Patientinnen einer neuen integrativen und interdisziplinären, gynäkologischen Schmerzsprechstunde mittels patientenfokussiertem Testsystem (PROMIS-29). Ergebnisse: Insgesamt konn-ten die Ergebnisse von 18 Patientinnen analysiert werden. Zur Nachuntersuchung zeigten sich signifikante Verbesserungen in allen Domänen des PROMIS-29. Schlussfolgerung: Die vorgestellte interdisziplinäre, integrative Schmerz-sprechstunde unter Zuhilfenahme patientenfokussierter Testsysteme kann relevante Schmerzdomänen erfassen und erfolgreich therapieren. Weitere Untersuchungen müssen diese neue Art der Verlaufsbeobachtung und gynäkologisch fokussierter Schmerzbehandlung nun mit längeren Nach-sorgeintervallen bestätigen.

Pain in tones - Is it possible to hear the pain quality? A pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: The adequate treatment of chronic pain also calls for measuring its quality not only its intensity. For this reason, this pilot study investigated the non-verbal description of pain quality based on tones, distinguishing between nociceptive and neuropathic pain. METHODS: A nociceptive and a neuropathic pain stimulus were applied to 80 chronic pain patients and 80 healthy subjects. Using a tone generator, all participants matched both pain stimuli to an appropriate tone (in Hz). The stimulus intensity was measured using the NRS-scale, and the PainDETECT questionnaire was completed. RESULTS: Both groups matched a significantly higher tone to the neuropathic than to the nociceptive pain stimulus. Compared to healthy participants, chronic pain patients allocated higher tones to both pain stimuli. Higher values were also shown for the neuropathic pain stimulus, and chronic pain patients indicated an overall higher intensity of pain as healthy participants. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to differentiate pain stimuli non-verbally through tones, however, whether quality or intensity, was the key factor remains unknown. Future studies could investigate the influence of additional factors. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: A practical tool using tones should be developed to detect pain quality in patients - without verbal descriptions - quickly and more precisely.

Successful treatment of complex regional pain syndrome with topical ambroxol: a case series.

AIM: The secretolytic drug ambroxol may be useful for the treatment of neuropathic pain due to its multiple modes of action. We hypothesized that ambroxol may be a treatment option for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). METHODS: Additional to standard therapy, eight CRPS-patients with symptoms of less than 12 months were treated with topical 20% ambroxol cream. Clinical courses were assessed using detailed anamnesis and clinical examination. RESULTS: Following treatment we found a reduction of spontaneous pain (6 patients), pain on movement (6 patients), edema (seven patients), allodynia (six patients), hyperalgesia (seven patients), reduction of skin reddening (four patients), improvement of motor dysfunction (six patients) and improvement of skin temperature (four patients). CONCLUSION: Topical treatment with ambroxol cream may ameliorate symptoms of CRPS.

Pre- and perioperative aspects of dermatosurgery.

Dermatosurgery occupies an exceptional position among all surgical disciplines. Above all, this includes the fact that, with very few exceptions, the vast majority of surgical interventions can be performed under local or regional anesthesia, usually in smaller procedure rooms that are spatially separated from larger operating suites. Thus, peri- and postinterventional patient monitoring is the responsibility of the dermatosurgeon and his team. Though inherently smaller, this team still has to observe numerous perioperative requirements that - in larger surgical specialties - would be attended to by a host of various specialists working in concert. Said requirements include hygienic aspects, knowledge concerning pre- and intraoperative patient monitoring, managing surgical site infections, adequate postsurgical pain management, as well as detailed pharmacological knowledge with respect to common local anesthetics and the toxic and allergic reactions associated therewith. Not only does this require interdisciplinary collaboration and shared responsibility for the patient. It also necessitates the development and implementation of quality-oriented and evidence-based guidelines that, in the dermatosurgical setting, usually extend far beyond the scope of the specialty per se. The objective of the present CME article is the condensed presentation of interdisciplinary aspects relating to the most important perioperative issues.

Prä- und perioperative Aspekte der Versorgung dermatochirurgischer Patienten.

Die Dermatochirurgie nimmt hinsichtlich vieler Punkte eine Sonderstellung unter den operativen Fächern ein. Hierzu gehört in erster Linie die Tatsache, dass bis auf wenige Ausnahmen fast alle Eingriffe traditionell in Lokal- bzw. Regionalanästhesie und oft auch in räumlich-infrastruktureller Trennung von den großen Zentral-Operationssälen stattfinden können. Die peri- und postoperative Überwachung obliegt dabei dem dermatochirurgischen Operationsteam. Das sui generis kleinere OP-Team hat somit eine ganze Reihe perioperativer Notwendigkeiten zu beachten, um die sich in den "großen" chirurgischen Fächern eine Vielzahl verschiedener beteiligter Fachgruppen gemeinsam kümmern. Hierzu gehören neben Hygieneaspekten, Kenntnissen in der Überwachung der Patienten sowie dem Aspekt der surgical site infections auch Fragen zur postoperativen Schmerztherapie sowie detailliertes pharmakologisches Wissen über die zur Anwendung kommenden Lokalanästhetika und das Handling der damit assoziierten toxischen und allergischen Reaktionen. Eine interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit und Verantwortung für den Patienten ist notwendig und erfordert die Erarbeitung und Umsetzung qualitätsorientierter und evidenzbasierter Handlungsanweisungen, die im dermatochirurgischen OP-Setting meist weit über das eigentliche Fach hinausgehen. Ziel dieses Weiterbildungsartikels soll die komprimierte Darstellung der genannten fachübergreifenden Standpunkte bezüglich der wichtigsten perioperativen Aspekte sein.

Construct validity and clinical utility of current research criteria of DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder diagnosis in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The validity and clinical utility of current research criteria of the DSM 5 category somatic symptom disorder (SSD) needs to be tested outside the setting of psychiatry. METHODS: Consecutive patients with an established diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) were evaluated by medical examination, psychiatric interview and self-report questionnaires in an outpatient pain medicine center. The diagnosis of SSD was established using published research criteria. The discriminative concurrent criterion validity of SSD was tested by comparing FMS-patients with and without SSD as to the amount of impairment and of health care seeking. Two clinicians blinded as to the purpose of the study, assessed the medical reports of patients after the evaluation for the determination of the need for psychotherapy based on the German FMS - guideline recommendations (clinical utility). RESULTS: 25.6% of 156 patients met the criteria of SSD. Patients meeting SSD criteria scored significantly higher in a self-report measure of disability. There were no significant differences in the number of patients on sick leave or applying for disability pension and in self-reported doctor visits and physiotherapy in the previous six months. 95.0% of patients with SSD and 71.6% of patients without SSD met the criteria of a current anxiety or depressive disorder as assessed by the psychiatric interview. 80.0% of patients with SSD and 66.7% of patients without SSD received a recommendation for psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The construct validity and clinical utility of current research criteria of DSM 5 category SSD were limited in German patients with FMS.

Airway injuries after one-lung ventilation: a comparison between double-lumen tube and endobronchial blocker: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Vocal cord injuries, postoperative hoarseness, and sore throat are common complications after general anesthesia. One-lung ventilation can be achieved via two techniques: double-lumen endotracheal tube or endobronchial blocker such as the Arndt blocker. The current study was designed to assess the impact of these techniques for one-lung ventilation on the incidence and severity of postoperative hoarseness, vocal cord lesions, and sore throat. METHODS: In this prospective trial, 60 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. One-lung ventilation was achieved with either an endobronchial blocker (blocker group) or a double-lumen-tube (double-lumen group). Postoperative hoarseness and sore throat were assessed at 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. Bronchial injuries and vocal cord lesions were examined by bronchoscopy immediately after surgery. RESULTS: In 56 included patients, postoperative hoarseness occurred significantly more frequently in the double-lumen group compared with the blocker group: 44% versus 17%, respectively (P = 0.046). Similar findings were observed for vocal cord lesions: 44% versus 17%, respectively (P = 0.046). The incidence of bronchial injuries was comparable between groups (P = 0.540). Cumulative number of days with hoarseness and sore throat were significantly increased in the double-lumen group compared with the blocker group (P < 0.01). No major complications such as bronchial ruptures were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of an increased incidence of minor airway injuries that may impair patient satisfaction when using a double-lumen tube instead of an endobronchial blocker for one-lung ventilation.