Analysis of Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance in NRG Oncology RTOG 0848.

PURPOSE: NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0848 is a 2-step randomized trial to evaluate the benefit of the addition of concurrent fluoropyrimidine and radiation therapy (RT) after adjuvant chemotherapy (second step) for patients with resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Real-time quality assurance (QA) was performed on each patient who underwent RT. This analysis aims to evaluate adherence to protocol-specified contouring and treatment planning and to report the types and frequencies of deviations requiring revisions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In addition to a web-based contouring atlas, the protocol outlined step-by-step instructions for generating the clinical treatment volume through the creation of specific regions of interest. The planning target volume was a uniform 0.5 cm clinical treatment volume expansion. One of 2 radiation oncology study chairs independently reviewed each plan. Plans with unacceptable deviations were returned for revision and resubmitted until approved. Treatment started after final approval of the RT plan. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, 354 patients were enrolled in the second randomization. Of these, 160 patients received RT and were included in the QA analysis. Resubmissions were more common for patients planned with 3-dimensional conformal RT (43%) than with intensity modulated RT (31%). In total, at least 1 resubmission of the treatment plan was required for 33% of patients. Among patients requiring resubmission, most only needed 1 resubmission (87%). The most common reasons for resubmission were unacceptable deviations with respect to the preoperative gross target volume (60.7%) and the pancreaticojejunostomy (47.5%). CONCLUSION: One-third of patients required resubmission to meet protocol compliance criteria, demonstrating the continued need for expending resources on real-time, pretreatment QA in trials evaluating the use of RT, particularly for pancreas cancer. Rigorous QA is critically important for clinical trials involving RT to ensure that the true effect of RT is assessed. Moreover, RT QA serves as an educational process through providing feedback from specialists to practicing radiation oncologists on best practices.

Axillary lymph node recurrence following wire-directed sentinel lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary metastases prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a safety net medical center.

BACKGROUND: Although sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is feasible, axillary management for patients with pretreatment biopsy-proven axillary metastases and who are clinically node-negative after NAC (ycN0) remains unclear. This retrospective study was performed to determine the rate of axillary lymph node recurrence for such patients who had wire-directed (WD) SLND. METHODS: Patients treated with NAC from 2015 to 2020 had axillary nodes evaluated by pretreatment ultrasound. Core biopsies were done on abnormal nodes, and microclips were placed in nodes during biopsy. For patients with biopsy-proven node metastases who received NAC and were ycN0 by clinical exam, WD SLND was done. Patients with negative nodes on frozen section had WD SLND alone; those with positive nodes had WD SLND plus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). RESULTS: Of 179 patients receiving NAC, 62 were biopsy-proven node-positive pre-NAC and ycN0 post-NAC. Thirty-five (56%) patients were node-negative on frozen section and had WD SLND alone. Twenty-seven (43%) patients had WD SLND + ALND. Forty-seven patients had postoperative regional node irradiation. With median follow-up of 40 months, there were recurrences in 4 (11%) of 35 patients having WD SLND and 5 (19%) of 27 having WD SLND + ALND, but there was only one axillary lymph node recurrence, identified by CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary node recurrence was very uncommon after WD SLND for patients who had pretreatment biopsy-proven node metastases and were ypN0 after NAC. These patients would be unlikely to derive clinical benefit from the addition of completion ALND to SLND.

Knowledge and Understanding of Radiation Therapy Among Patients With Breast Cancer From Culturally Diverse Backgrounds at a Safety-Net Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive understanding of oncologic treatment is essential for shared decision-making. However, comprehension of information in radiation oncology consults is poorly understood, particularly among Spanish-speaking patients at safetynet hospitals. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine post-consultation radiation oncology knowledge and health literacy among breast cancer patients from culturally diverse backgrounds. METHODS: After consultation for curative post-operative breast radiotherapy (cT1-4N1-3M0), the Radiation Oncology Knowledge Assessment Survey (ROKAS) was administered to Spanish- and English-speaking patients ≥ 18 years old, from January 2021 to January 2022 at a safety-net hospital. Radiation knowledge was assessed using the ROKAS which included eight radiation-specific multiple-choice questions and two separate questions regarding short- and long-term side effects. Additional independent variables included validated questionnaires related to health literacy, health numeracy, acculturation, primary language, and sociodemographic factors. Bivariate Pearson correlations and T-test analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between the independent variables and post-consultation radiation knowledge. RESULTS: Fifty ROKAS were obtained from 25 English- and 25 Spanish-speaking breast cancer patients (median age 57 [IQR 49.75-62.25]). When compared to Englishspeaking patients, Spanish-speaking patients had lower health literacy, health numeracy, and acculturation. There was no difference in the multiple-choice ROKAS score between English- and Spanish-speakers, or correlation with the other independent factors. Higher health numeracy correlated with a higher accuracy for identifying short-term side effects. Lower accuracy of identifying long-term side effects was seen in patients with lower education levels, health literacy, health numeracy, and acculturation, with the most missed long-term side effects being arm swelling, skin toxicity, and heart toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low health literacy, health numeracy, acculturation, and education levels as well as Spanish-speaking patients were associated with poor understanding of radiotherapy long-term side effects. Determining barriers to radiation knowledge is crucial to improve shared decision-making between patients and providers in a culturally diverse population.

Racial disparities and standard treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer: a National Cancer Database study.

Background: Mortality rates in colorectal cancer (CRC) continue to be higher in Black compared to White patients. While standard treatment modalities for locally advanced rectal cancer have been shown to improve outcomes, there are limited studies assessing the receipt of standard treatment in rectal cancer based on race. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the use of standard treatment across racial groups in locally advanced rectal cancer and its effect on survival. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients ≥18 years old with clinical and pathologic stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma who received treatment from 2004 to 2014. Standard treatment was defined as complete surgical excision with either neoadjuvant or adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify racial differences in receiving standard treatment. Cox proportional hazards were used to estimate the effects of standard vs. nonstandard treatment on survival differences based on race. Results: A total of 70,677 patients with stage II (n=35,079) or stage III (n=35,598) rectal adenocarcinoma met the inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, Black [odds ratio (OR): 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.79; P<0.001] and Hispanic White (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.80-0.92; P>0.001) patients were less likely to receive standard treatment compared to non-Hispanic White patients. On multivariable Cox regression, nonstandard treatment was significantly associated with worse survival [hazard ratio (HR): 1.69; 95% CI: 1.65-1.73; P<0.001] compared to standard treatment. Even after adjusting for patient, demographic, and facility characteristics, Black patients had higher mortality rates compared to White patients in the whole population (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.09-1.20; P<0.0001). This survival difference between Black and non-Hispanic White patients persisted in both the standard (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.19; P=0.008) and nonstandard (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.10-1.25; P<0.0001) treatment subgroups. Decreased survival outcomes in Black patients were more pronounced for those who underwent nonstandard treatment, particularly when treating stage III disease (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.19-1.42; P<0.0001). Conclusions: Nonstandard treatment in stage II and III rectal cancer is associated with worse survival compared to standard treatment regimens. Black patients are more likely to receive nonstandard treatment and have worse survival outcomes compared to White patients.

Acral lentiginous melanoma-Population, treatment, and survival using the NCDB from 2004 to 2015.

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a rare histological subtype of cutaneous malignant melanoma that typically presents on the palms and soles. To characterize the demographic and treatment characteristics of ALM, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to describe a large multi-institutional cohort of ALM patients, consisting of 4,796 ALM patients from 2004 to 2015. ALM was more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage overall compared with non-ALM cutaneous melanomas, and more likely to be thicker, ulcerated, lymph node positive, and have lymphovascular invasion and positive margins. When stratified by stage, ALM had worse survival compared with non-ALM patients, most notably in stage III patients with 5-year survival of 47.5% versus 56.7%, respectively (p < .001). In ALM patients, older age, male sex, higher comorbidity burden, increased tumor thickness and ulceration, positive lymph nodes, and positive metastasis were independently associated with lower 5-year survival. Multimodality therapy, defined as surgery in addition to systemic therapy and/or radiation therapy, was associated with higher survival in stage III patients but not in other stages. These results call for further investigation into possible treatment intensification in the ALM population in the future.

Use of Salvage Surgery or Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiply Recurrent Skull Base Chordomas: A Single-Institution Experience and Review of the Literature.

Introduction Chordomas are locally destructive neoplasms characterized by appreciable recurrence rates after initial multimodality treatment. We examined the outcome of salvage treatment in recurrent/progressive skull base chordomas. Methods This is a retrospective review of recurrent/progressive skull base chordomas at a tertiary urban academic medical center. The outcomes evaluated were overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and incidence of new toxicity. Results Eighteen consecutive patients who underwent ≥1 course of treatment (35.3% salvage surgery, 23.5% salvage radiation, and 41.2% both) were included. The median follow-up was 98.6 months (range 16-215 months). After initial treatment, the median PFS was 17.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.9-22.6 months). Following initial therapy, age ≥ 40 had improved PFS on univariate analysis ( p = 0.03). All patients had local recurrence, with 15 undergoing salvage surgical resections and 16 undergoing salvage radiation treatments (mostly stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]). The median PFS was 59.2 months (95% CI: 4.0-99.3 months) after salvage surgery, 58.4 months (95% CI: 25.9-195 months) after salvage radiation, and 58.4 months (95% CI: 25.9.0-98.4 months) combined. Overall survival for the total cohort was 98.7% ± 1.7% at 2 years and 92.8% ± 5.5% at 5 years. Salvage treatments were well-tolerated with two patients (11%) reporting tinnitus and one patient each (6%) reporting headaches, visual field deficits, hearing loss, anosmia, dysphagia, or memory loss. Conclusion Refractory skull base chordomas present a challenging treatment dilemma. Repeat surgical resection or SRS seems to provide adequate salvage therapy that is well-tolerated when treated at a tertiary center offering multimodality care.

Racial disparities in receipt of standard chemoradiation in anal squamous cell carcinoma, an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) consists of concurrent chemoradiation. We evaluated whether racial differences exist in the receipt of standard treatment and its association with survival. METHODS: From the National Cancer Database, we identified patients diagnosed with anal SCC (Stages 2-3) between 2004 and 2015. Using logistic regression, we evaluated racial differences in the probability of receiving standard chemoradiation. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate associations between race, receipt of standard therapy and survival. RESULTS: Our analysis included 19,835 patients. Patients receiving standard chemoradiation had better survival than patients receiving nonstandard therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.68; p < 0.001). Compared to White patients, Black patients were less likely to receive standard therapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.85; 95% CI 0.76-0.96; p < 0.008). We observed no statistical difference in mortality between Black and White patients overall (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.15; p = 0.24). However, for the subgroup of patients receiving nonstandard therapy, Black patients had an increased mortality risk compared to White patients (HR 1.17, CI 1.01-1.35; p = 0.034). We observed no survival differences in the subgroup of patients receiving standard treatment (HR 1.00, CI 0.90-1.11, p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: Standard treatment in anal SCC is associated with better survival, but Black patients are less likely to receive standard treatment than White patients. Although Black patients had higher mortality than White patients in the subgroup of patients receiving nonstandard therapy, this difference was ameliorated in the subset receiving standard therapy.

Competing with a pandemic: Trends in research design in a time of Covid-19.

INTRODUCTION: During the Covid-19 pandemic, major journals have published a significant number of Covid-19 related articles in a short period of time. While this is necessary to combat the worldwide pandemic, it may have trade-offs with respect to publishing research from other disciplines. OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in published research design before and after the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional review of all 322 full-length research studies published between October 1, 2019 and April 30, 2020 in three major medical journals. We compared the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and studies with a control group before and after January 31, 2020, when Covid-19 began garnering international attention. RESULTS: The number of full-length research studies per issue was not statistically different before and after the Covid-19 pandemic (from 3.7 to 3.5 per issue, p = 0.17). Compared to before January 31, 2020, 0.7 fewer non-Covid-19 studies per issue were published versus after January 31, 2020 (p<0.001), a change that was offset by Covid-19 studies. Among non-Covid-19 studies, 0.9 fewer studies with a control group per issue were published after January 31, 2020, with RCTs contributing to nearly all the decline (p<0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). In the same timeframe, non-Covid-19 studies without a control group and non-Covid-19 studies without randomization experienced relatively small changes that did not meet our threshold for statistical significance (increases of 0.1 and 0.1 per issue, p = 0.80, p = 0.88, respectively). LIMITATIONS: Using a simple heuristic for assessing research design and lack of generalizability to the general medical literature. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the increase in Covid-19 studies coincided with a decrease of mostly non-Covid-19 RCTs.

Cost-effectiveness of chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy versus chemoradiation alone in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer usually includes a combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. In squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), recent studies have indicated that esophagectomy after chemoradiation does not significantly improve survival but may reduce recurrence at the cost of treatment-related mortality. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of chemoradiation with and without esophagectomy. METHODS: We developed a decision tree and Markov model to compare chemoradiation therapy alone (CRT) versus chemoradiation plus surgery (CRT+S) in a cohort of 57-year-old male patients with esophageal SCC, over 25 years. We used information on survival, cancer recurrence, and side effects from a Cochrane meta-analysis of two randomized trials. Societal utility values and costs of cancer care (2017, USD) were from medical literature. To test robustness, we conducted deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: In our base scenario, CRT resulted in less cost for more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to CRT+S ($154 082 for 1.32 QALYs/patient versus $165 035 for 1.30 QALYs/patient, respectively). In DSA, changes resulted in scenarios where CRT+S is cost-effective at thresholds between $100 000-$150 000/QALY. In PSA, CRT+S was dominant 17.9% and cost-effective at willingness-to-pay of $150 000/QALY 38.9% of the time, and CRT was dominant 30.6% and cost-effective 61.1% of the time. This indicates that while CRT would be preferred most of the time, variation in parameters may change cost-effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that more data is needed regarding the clinical benefits of CRT+S for treatment of localized esophageal SCC, although CRT should be cautiously preferred.

Stereotactic radiosurgery and ipilimumab for patients with melanoma brain metastases: clinical outcomes and toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: There is evidence that the combination of ipilimumab and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases improves outcomes. We investigated clinical outcomes, radiation toxicity, and impact of ipilimumab timing in patients treated with SRS for melanoma brain metastases. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 91 patients treated with SRS at our institution for melanoma brain metastases from 2006 to 2015. Concurrent ipilimumab administration was defined as within ± 4 weeks of SRS procedure. Acute and late toxicities were graded with CTCAE v4.03. Overall survival (OS), local failure, distant brain failure, and failure-free survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. OS was analyzed with Cox regression. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received ipilimumab concurrent with SRS, 28 patients non-concurrently, and 40 patients did not receive ipilimumab. The median age was 62 years and 91% had KPS ≥ 80. The median follow-up time was 7.4 months. Patients who received ipilimumab had a median OS of 15.1 months compared to 7.8 months in patients who did not (p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, ipilimumab (p = 0.02) and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (p = 0.02) were associated with OS. There were no differences in intracranial control by ipilimumab administration or timing. The incidence of radiation necrosis was 5%, with most events occurring in patients who received ipilimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received ipilimumab had improved OS even after adjusting for prognostic factors. Ipilimumab did not appear to increase risk for acute toxicity. The majority of radiation necrosis events, however, occurred in patients who received ipilimumab. Our results support the continued use of SRS and ipilimumab as clinically appropriate.

The growing importance of lesion volume as a prognostic factor in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is considered standard of care for patients with 1-3 brain metastases (BM). Recent observational studies have shown equivalent OS in patients with 5+ BM compared to those with 2-4, suggesting SRS alone may be appropriate in these patients. We aim to review outcomes of patients treated with SRS with 2-4 versus 5+ BM. This analysis included consecutive patients from 1994 to 2015 treated with SRS. Of 1017 patients, we excluded patients with a single BM and patients without adequate survival data, resulting in 391 patients. All risk factors were entered into univariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model, and significant factors were entered into multivariate analysis (MVA). We additionally analyzed outcomes after excluding patients with prior surgery or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Median follow-up was 7.1 months. Median KPS was 90, mean age was 59, and most common histologies were melanoma and lung. Median tumor volume was 3.41 cc. Patients with 2-4 BM had a median OS of 8.1 months compared to 6.2 months for those with 5+ BM (P = 0.0136). On MVA, tumor volume, KPS, and histology remained significant for OS, whereas lesion number did not. Similar results were found when excluding patients with prior surgery or WBRT. Rather than lesion number, the strongest prognostic factors for patients undergoing SRS were tumor volume >10 cc, KPS, and histology. BM number may therefore not be the most important criterion for candidacy for SRS. Patients with 5 or more BM should be considered for SRS.

Combination ipilimumab and radiosurgery for brain metastases: tumor, edema, and adverse radiation effects.

OBJECTIVETumor and edema volume changes of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and ipilimumab are not well described, and there is concern regarding the safety of combination treatment. The authors evaluated tumor, edema, and adverse radiation-induced changes after SRS with and without ipilimumab and identified associated risk factors.METHODSThis single-institution retrospective study included 72 patients with melanoma brain metastases treated consecutively with upfront SRS from 2006 to 2015. Concurrent ipilimumab was defined as ipilimumab treatment within 4 weeks of SRS. At baseline and during each follow-up, tumor and edema were measured in 3 orthogonal planes. The (length × width × height/2) formula was used to estimate tumor and edema volumes and was validated in the present study for estimation of edema volume. Tumor and edema volume changes from baseline were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Local failure, lesion hemorrhage, and treatment-related imaging changes (TRICs) were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards model.RESULTSOf 310 analyzed lesions, 91 were not treated with ipilimumab, 59 were treated with concurrent ipilimumab, and 160 were treated with nonconcurrent ipilimumab. Of 106 randomly selected lesions with measurable peritumoral edema, the mean edema volume by manual contouring was 7.45 cm3 and the mean volume by (length × width × height)/2 formula estimation was 7.79 cm3 with R2 = 0.99 and slope of 1.08 on line of best fit. At 6 months after SRS, the ipilimumab groups had greater tumor (p = 0.001) and edema (p = 0.005) volume reduction than the control group. The concurrent ipilimumab group had the highest rate of lesion response and lowest rate of lesion progression (p = 0.002). Within the concurrent ipilimumab group, SRS dose ≥ 20 Gy was associated with significantly greater median tumor volume reduction at 3 months (p = 0.01) and 6 months (p = 0.02). The concurrent ipilimumab group also had the highest rate of lesion hemorrhage (p = 0.01). Any ipilimumab was associated with higher incidence of symptomatic TRICs (p = 0.005). The overall incidence of pathologically confirmed radiation necrosis (RN) was 2%. In multivariate analysis, tumor and edema response at 3 months were the strongest predictors of local failure (HR 0.131 and HR 0.125) and lesion hemorrhage (HR 0.225 and HR 0.262). Tumor and edema response at 1.5 months were the strongest predictors of TRICs (HR 0.144 and HR 0.297).CONCLUSIONSThe addition of ipilimumab improved tumor and edema volume reduction but was associated with a higher incidence of lesion hemorrhage and symptomatic TRICs. There may be a radiation dose-response relationship between SRS and ipilimumab when administered concurrently. Early tumor and edema response were excellent predictors of subsequent local failure, lesion hemorrhage, and TRICs. The incidence of pathologically proven RN was low, supporting the relative safety of ipilimumab in radiosurgery treatment.

Tolerance of Orthotopic Ileal Neobladders to Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The present retrospective study analyzed the tolerance of orthotopic ileal neobladders to radiotherapy by reviewing the acute and late toxicity in patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy after radical cystectomy/cystoprostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional database was created for patients who had undergone radical cystectomy/cystoprostatectomy and neobladder reconstruction, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). The patient and tumor characteristics were recorded. The RT data were reviewed to determine the treatment technique used, the radiation dose received by the neobladder, and acute and late toxicity evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, scale. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were included, with a median age of 64 years. Of the 25 patients, 18 received a dose of 45 to 50.4 Gy. The most common reasons for postoperative radiotherapy were close or positive surgical margins and pT3-pT4 or N+ disease. Ten patients underwent intensity modulated RT. All but 1 patient completed the RT course. Of the patients who completed their RT schedule, none had grade ≥ 3 acute gastrointestinal toxicity. One patient who received concurrent chemotherapy developed grade 3 acute genitourinary toxicity. Three patients reported late grade 1 genitourinary toxicity (frequency of urination, mild leakage at night), with no reports of chronic gastrointestinal toxicity. None of the patients experienced neobladder perforation, leak, or fistula. CONCLUSION: The use of moderate doses of pelvic RT (range, 45-50.4 Gy) was well tolerated among the 25 patients who underwent RT after cystoprostatectomy with orthotopic neobladder creation. This finding supports the use of postoperative RT to moderate doses in this patient population when clinically indicated.

No Acute Changes in LVEF Observed With Concurrent Trastuzumab and Breast Radiation With Low Heart Doses.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Treatment for HER2-postitive breast cancer often includes trastuzumab, breast/chest wall (CW) radiation (RT), and anthracyclines, all of which have cardiac toxicity. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between heart dose and acute left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes in patients who received concurrent trastuzumab and breast/CW RT with and without anthracycline use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all nonmetastatic breast cancer patients from 2008 to 2015 who received concurrent trastuzumab and breast/CW RT. Baseline LVEF was compared with the LVEF closest to treatment completion as well as with the lowest post-treatment LVEF. LVEF changes were correlated with laterality, heart dosimetric parameters, and doxorubicin use. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included in our analysis. The median follow-up was 45 months. Forty-one patients were right-sided and 47 left-sided. Thirty-one patients received doxorubicin, 16 right-sided and 15 left-sided. Mean heart dose was 1.10 Gy and 3.63 Gy for right- and left-sided patients, respectively (P < .001). In the entire cohort, a significant LVEF decrease of 3.0% was observed pre- and post-treatment. There was a significant effect of doxorubicin (P = .013) and a nonsignificant effect of RT laterality (P = .088) on LVEF change. The test of interaction between doxorubicin and laterality was not significant (P = .90). No significant association was found between LVEF change and heart dosimetric parameters, including percent volume of heart receiving 5 Gy (V5), 10 Gy (V10), 20 Gy (V20), and 45 Gy (V45), and maximum dose. Similar results were found when baseline LVEF was compared with the lowest post-treatment LVEF. CONCLUSION: With cardiac doses < 4 Gy, declines in LVEF were not related to tumor laterality or heart dosimetric parameters. Statistically significant LVEF decreases were mainly attributed to doxorubicin.

Percent of Tracer Clearance at 40 Minutes in MAG3 Renal Scans Is More Sensitive Than T1/2 for Symptomatic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To increase the diagnostic sensitivity of standard MAG3 diuretic renal scans for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) by exploring the utility of an alternative measurement P40, the percentage of maximal tracer counts present at 40 minutes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with strong clinical and anatomic evidence for UPJO may have a normal T1/2, making definitive diagnosis difficult. We reviewed the charts of 142 consecutive patients who underwent successful laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJO between 2005 and 2015. Both pre- and postoperative renal scan images were available for 37 symptomatic patients with primary unilateral UPJO and 2 kidneys. We defined P40 as the percentage of maximal tracer counts present at 40 minutes. We identified the upper limit of normal (97.5th percentile, +2SD) for P40 using the preoperative renal scans from the unaffected kidney. We compared the sensitivity of P40 to T1/2 to identify symptomatic UPJO. RESULTS: In our cohort, 51% of symptomatic patients (n = 19) had a normal T1/2 (median 8.9 minutes; interquartile range: 7.5 minutes) and 49% (n = 18) had an abnormal T1/2 (median: 40 minutes; interquartile range: 0 minute). None of the patients had an abnormal P40 on their unaffected kidney. All patients with an abnormal T1/2 also had an abnormal P40. P40 increased the sensitivity of the renal scan from 49% (n = 18 of 37) to 73% (n = 27 of 37) when compared to T1/2. The majority of patients (95%) demonstrated an improvement in P40 after pyeloplasty. CONCLUSION: P40 markedly increases the sensitivity of a renal scan for diagnosing symptomatic UPJO and may be another valuable marker in addition to T1/2 to document functional improvement in drainage after pyeloplasty.

Prognostic factors for melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is routinely used to treat brain metastases from melanoma due to their radioresistant nature. The median survival for these patients is 4-6 months, according to earlier studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors that influence survival in patients with metastatic melanoma to the brain treated with SRS. METHODS This retrospective analysis included all patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with SRS at the University of Southern California between 1994 and 2015. For the entire cohort, the authors performed a multivariable Cox regression analysis with an end point of survival. Covariates included number of lesions, total intracranial tumor volume, age, sex, and treatment date prior to 2005 or 2005 onward. In the subset of patients with > 1 lesion, additional multivariable Cox regression was performed, with covariates of Karnofsky Performance Scale, Graded Prognostic Assessment, Recursive Partitioning Analysis, timing of metastases (synchronous/metachronous), change in lesion number, and previous whole-brain radiation therapy or resection in addition to the previously mentioned covariates. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the day SRS was performed to the date of last follow-up or date of death. RESULTS A total of 401 patients were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 35.1 months for patients alive at the time of analysis, and the median OS was 7.7 months for the entire cohort (95% CI 6.7-8.3 months). In the entire cohort, greater number of brain lesions, higher total intracranial tumor volume, age > 50 years, treatment prior to 2005, and male sex were found to be statistically significant factors associated with worse survival. The strongest risk factors for decreased OS were tumor volume > 10 cm3 and ≥ 5 lesions, with hazard ratios for risk of death of 1.7 and 2.2, respectively. In the subset of patients with > 1 lesion, tumor volume > 10 cm3 and no resection were the only factors significantly associated with decreased OS, with hazard ratios of 1.9 and 2.0 (hazard ratio of 0.49 for resection), respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that greater lesion number, higher intracranial tumor volume, older age, treatment prior to 2005, and male sex have prognostic significance for decreased OS in patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with SRS. Additionally, in the subset of patients with > 1 lesion, only higher total tumor volume and no resection were associated with worse survival.

The Influence of Age and Comorbidity on the Benefit of Adding Androgen Deprivation to Dose-escalated Radiation in Men With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can improve outcomes for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PrCa) receiving external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Older men and men with significant comorbidity may be more susceptible to the harms of ADT, therefore we aimed to determine whether these men benefit from ADT. METHODS: The adult comorbidity evaluation-27 index categorized severity of comorbidity in 636 men treated for IR-PrCa with dose-escalated EBRT (>75 Gy). The cohort was dichotomized at median age of 70. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis evaluated the association of ADT with failure-free survival (FFS) for each age and comorbidity subgroup. RESULTS: A total of 48% of men were 70 years and above. After adjustment for tumor characteristics, the addition of ADT to EBRT was associated with improved FFS for both men below 70 years of age (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.99; P=0.046) and men 70 years and above (AHR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.91; P=0.035). ADT improved FFS for men below 70 years who had no or mild comorbidity (AHR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.73; P=0.011) but not for men below 70 years who had moderate or severe comorbidity (AHR 1.62; 95% CI, 0.35-7.49; P=0.537). Similarly, in men 70 years and above, there was a trend for improved FFS with ADT in healthy men (AHR 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-1.08; P=0.058) but not in men with moderate to severe comorbidity (AHR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.06-2.56; P=0.318). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ADT to dose-escalated EBRT can improve outcomes for both younger and older men with IR-PrCa. This benefit was more pronounced in healthy men.