ABSTRACT
Background: Doctors of osteopathy (D.O.) have historically been underrepresented in the orthopedic literature. As adult reconstruction (AR) continues to rank among the most competitive orthopedic fellowships, participation in research likely serves a key role for successfully matching. This study sought to identify trends in D.O. orthopedic publications and assess for correlations between these trends and osteopathic AR match results. Methods: The top 10 orthopedic surgery journals based on impact factor were selected for analysis. Articles published between 2010 and 2021 were screened to assess for publications with a D.O. author, as well as authorship position. A total of 29,499 articles were available for final analysis. Data from the San Francisco Residency and Fellowship Match Services were also reviewed to evaluate the number of osteopathic applicants and their match rates during the same study period. Trends in D.O. publications and osteopathic AR match rates were then assessed for any correlations. Results: From 2010 to 2021, there was a significant increase in orthopedic and arthroplasty-related publications with a D.O. author (P < .0001), as well as D.O. first (P = .0006) and senior authorship positions (P = .009). Osteopathic match rate significantly increased during the study period (P = .003). There was a strong correlation between the increase in osteopathic match rate and arthroplasty-related publications with a D.O. author (r = 0.76). Conclusions: From 2010 to 2021, there was an upward trend of osteopathic orthopedic publications. This increase is strongly correlated with an increase in osteopathic AR match rate. Our findings suggest that authorship in publications may play a key role in successfully matching into an AR fellowship.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has significantly increased over the past decade. Internet content is largely unregulated and may contain inaccurate and/or misleading information about robotic TKA. Our goal was to assess the content, quality, and readability of online material regarding robotic-assisted TKA. METHODS: We conducted an internet search for the top 50 web sites from each of the 3 most popular search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing) using the search term robotic total knee replacement. Each web site was assessed for content, quality, and readability. Web site quality was assessed utilizing the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST). Readability was assessed utilizing the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and Flesch Reading Ease Formula scores. RESULTS: General risks of TKA were discussed in 47.2%, while benefits were discussed in 98.6% of all web sites. Inaccurate claims occurred at a significantly higher rate in physician/community hospital sources compared to university/academic web sites (59% vs 28%, P = .045). Web sites from university/academic web sites had the highest QUEST scores, while physician/community hospital sources scored the lowest (16.1 vs 10.6, P = .01). Most web sites were written at a college reading level or higher. CONCLUSION: Patients should be counseled on the largely unregulated nature of online information regarding robotic-assisted TKA. Physicians and hospitals should consider revising the readability of their online information to a more appropriate level in order to provide accurate, evidence-based information to allow the patient to make an informed consent decision.
