Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Virol ; 92: 1-6, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28475925

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay (Aptima) is a real-time transcription-mediated amplification assay CE-approved for the diagnosis and monitoring of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. OBJECTIVE: Aptima's analytical performance was compared to the Abbott RealTime HCV assay (RealTime) in a clinical routine setting. STUDY DESIGN: Overall 295 clinical plasma samples (117 prospective/fresh; 178 retrospective/frozen) from HCV-infected patients were tested in Aptima and RealTime to determine concordance on qualitative and quantitative results. Linearity and precision at low viral loads (VLs; 0.8-3.3LogIU/mL) was tested using dilutions of the 5th WHO standard, in 10 and 20 replicates in the two assays, respectively. The ability to measure different HCV genotypes and accuracy were analyzed using the Seracare EQA panel. RESULTS: Inter-assay agreement for qualitative results (prospective samples) was 88% (kappa=0.78). For the 127 samples with quantitative results in both assays, Aptima yielded on average slightly higher values (by 0.24LogIU/mL; Bland-Altman method) than RealTime. Concordance between assay results was excellent (R=0.98). At low VLs (0.8-3.3LogIU/mL), Aptima demonstrated good linearity and precision, similar to RealTime. Aptima detected and accurately quantified all main HCV genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Aptima demonstrated excellent precision, linearity, and accuracy in all genotypes tested. Good concordance was observed between Aptima and RealTime assays in clinical samples. The performance of the Aptima assay, on the fully automated Panther platform, makes it an excellent candidate for the detection and monitoring of HCV RNA in plasma and serum samples.


Subject(s)
Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Viral Load/methods , Data Accuracy , Genotype , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/virology , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Prospective Studies , RNA, Viral/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
J Clin Virol ; 52(1): 17-22, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21764631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies investigating clinical significance of HIV-1 minimal residual viremia (MRV) suggest potential utility of assays more sensitive than those routinely used to monitor viral suppression. However currently available methods, based on different technologies, show great variation in detection limit and input plasma volume, and generally suffer from lack of standardization. OBJECTIVES: In order to establish new tools suitable for routine quantification of minimal residual viremia in patients under virological suppression, some modifications were introduced into standard procedure of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay leading to a "modified" and an "ultrasensitive" protocols. STUDY DESIGN: The following modifications were introduced: calibration curve extended towards low HIV-1 RNA concentration; 4 fold increased sample volume by concentrating starting material; reduced volume of internal control; adoption of "open-mode" software for quantification. Analytical performances were evaluated using the HIV-1 RNA Working Reagent 1 for NAT assays (NIBSC). Both tests were applied to clinical samples from virologically suppressed patients. RESULTS: The "modified" and the "ultrasensitive" configurations of the assay reached a limit of detection of 18.8 (95% CI: 11.1-51.0 cp/mL) and 4.8 cp/mL (95% CI: 2.6-9.1 cp/mL), respectively, with high precision and accuracy. In clinical samples from virologically suppressed patients, "modified" and "ultrasensitive" protocols allowed to detect and quantify HIV RNA in 12.7% and 46.6%, respectively, of samples resulted "not-detectable", and in 70.0% and 69.5%, respectively, of samples "detected <40 cp/mL" in the standard assay. CONCLUSIONS: The "modified" and "ultrasensitive" assays are precise and accurate, and easily adoptable in routine diagnostic laboratories for measuring MRV.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1/genetics , Calibration , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Humans , Limit of Detection , RNA, Viral/blood , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/virology , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viral Load , Viremia/diagnosis , Viremia/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...