Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35981073

ABSTRACT

This article evaluates and compares the performance and perception of prosthetic devices based on different design principles, a traditional rigid gripper and an adaptable poly-articulated hand, in a pre- and post-training protocol with an individual with bilateral amputation. As a representative of the first class, we use commercial hands (Ottobock's MyoHand VariPlus Speed), which is a widely adopted model by prosthesis users worldwide. We compare these with two SoftHand Pro hands, which are experimental prototypes exhibiting 19 articulations actuated by one single motor, and are inspired by human hand motor control models. Results show that the individual with bilateral amputation, who was a non-expert myoelectric user, achieved better performance with adaptive poly-articulated hands. Furthermore, the acceptation, satisfaction and perceived functionality of the user were considerably higher for the SoftHand Pro. An observational analysis of the patient's behaviour by experienced therapists suggests that adaptable poly-articulated hands reduced compensatory movements and cognitive load. Using soft technologies may be especially advantageous for individuals with bilateral amputation, who present a very limited residual mobility and can largely benefit from the active use of their artificial arms in everyday life.


Subject(s)
Artificial Limbs , Bionics , Amputation, Surgical , Hand , Humans , Perception , Prosthesis Design
2.
Sci Adv ; 5(6): eaaw3121, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31183406

ABSTRACT

Recent studies extended the classical view that touch is mainly devoted to the perception of the external world. Perceptual tasks where the hand was stationary demonstrated that cutaneous stimuli from contact with objects provide the illusion of hand displacement. Here, we tested the hypothesis that touch provides auxiliary proprioceptive feedback for guiding actions. We used a well-established perceptual phenomenon to dissociate the estimates of reaching direction from touch and musculoskeletal proprioception. Participants slid their fingertip on a ridged plate to move toward a target without any visual feedback on hand location. Tactile motion estimates were biased by ridge orientation, inducing a systematic deviation in hand trajectories in accordance with our hypothesis. Results are in agreement with an ideal observer model, where motion estimates from different somatosensory cues are optimally integrated for the control of movement. These outcomes shed new light on the interplay between proprioception and touch in active tasks.


Subject(s)
Movement , Proprioception/physiology , Touch/physiology , Adult , Cues , Female , Hand/physiology , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation , Visual Perception , Young Adult
3.
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot ; 2013: 6650377, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24187196

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present the Pisa/IIT SoftHand with myoelectric control as a synergy-driven approach for a prosthetic hand. Commercially available myoelectric hands are more expensive, heavier, and less robust than their body-powered counterparts; however, they can offer greater freedom of motion and a more aesthetically pleasing appearance. The Pisa/IIT SoftHand is built on the motor control principle of synergies through which the immense complexity of the hand is simplified into distinct motor patterns. As the SoftHand grasps, it follows a synergistic path with built-in flexibility to allow grasping of a wide variety of objects with a single motor. Here we test, as a proof-of-concept, 4 myoelectric controllers: a standard controller in which the EMG signal is used only as a position reference, an impedance controller that determines both position and stiffness references from the EMG input, a standard controller with vibrotactile force feedback, and finally a combined vibrotactile-impedance (VI) controller. Four healthy subjects tested the control algorithms by grasping various objects. All controllers were sufficient for basic grasping, however the impedance and vibrotactile controllers reduced the physical and cognitive load on the user, while the combined VI mode was the easiest to use of the four. While these results need to be validated with amputees, they suggest a low-cost, robust hand employing hardware-based synergies is a viable alternative to traditional myoelectric prostheses.


Subject(s)
Artificial Limbs , Hand Strength/physiology , Hand/physiology , Robotics/instrumentation , Adult , Algorithms , Amputees/rehabilitation , Artificial Limbs/statistics & numerical data , Electromyography , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Design , Robotics/methods , Software , User-Computer Interface
4.
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc ; 2006: 1021-4, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17946436

ABSTRACT

In this paper we propose an MR (magnetic resonance) compatible electrocutaneous stimulator able to inject an electric current, variable in amplitude and frequency, into the fingertips in order to elicit tactile skin receptors (mechanoreceptors). The desired goal is to evoke specific tactile sensations selectively stimulating skin receptors by means of an electric current in place of mechanical stimuli. The field of application ranges from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) tactile studies to augmented reality technology. The device here proposed is designed using safety criteria in order to comply with the threshold of voltage and current permitted by regulations. Moreover, MR safety and compatibility criteria were considered in order to perform experiments inside the MR scanner during an fMRI acquisition for functional brain activation analysis. Psychophysical laboratory tests are performed in order to define the different evoked tactile sensation. After verifying the device MR safety and compatibility on a phantom, a test on a human subject during fMRI acquisition is performed to visualize the brain areas activated by the simulated tactile sensation.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping/instrumentation , Brain/physiology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Fingers/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Touch/physiology , Brain Mapping/methods , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...