Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Pathol Res Pract ; 186(1): 150-3, 1990 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1690414

ABSTRACT

Cervical specimens from 1500 patients were prepared by means of a centrifugation procedure to obtain monolayer specimens suitable for automated screening using a machine. After staining according to Papanicolaou, each specimen was diagnosed by four independent cytologists from two different institutes. Within each institute, noncorresponding screening results were discussed to arrive at a conclusion diagnosis. After discussion of the discrepancies between the two centers, the conclusion diagnoses were combined to one final cytological diagnosis for each specimen. This final diagnosis is to be used as a reference diagnosis to evaluate machine classification as obtained by the AUTOPLAN/MIAC system. This system is presently being tested both in Leiden and in Frankfurt for its accuracy of detecting abnormal lesions in cervical specimens. The used diagnostic procedure resulted in a negative reference diagnosis for 1217 of the 1500 specimens; 170 specimens were diagnosed CIN I or II (mild or moderate dysplasia) and 113 specimens had a positive reference diagnosis (CIN III or invasive carcinoma). Based on these three diagnostic classes, the agreement between the four independent cytologists and the reference diagnosis varied between 93.60% and 96.60%, whereas 95.33% of all 6000 diagnoses correlated with the reference diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Papanicolaou Test , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Observer Variation , Staining and Labeling , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
2.
Cancer Detect Prev ; 11(3-6): 319-22, 1988.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3390853

ABSTRACT

Between 1971 and 1981, 2,184 female patients with mammary gland changes were examined using the triple diagnosis approach (clinical finding, mammography, aspiration cytology) and were found unsuspicious for cancer. Seven of these patients (0.32%) in a follow-up were found to harbor cancer. In view of these findings it is felt acceptable to postpone immediate surgical intervention in case of negative results of the triple diagnosis approach provided there is a reliable performance of these diagnostic methods and a close follow-up in these patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast/cytology , Biopsy, Needle , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...