ABSTRACT
El Comité de Infecciones en Inmunocomprometidos de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectología presenta aquí una actualización en el Manejo de episodios de neutropenia febril en adultos y niños con cáncer, derivado de los grandes cambios ocurridos en los últimos años en el enfrentamiento de estos pacientes. Para estos efectos, un grupo multidisciplinario desarrolló recomendaciones en relación a: su enfrentamiento inicial, exámenes de laboratorio requeridos, el tratamiento antimicrobiano inicial empírico y frente a focos infecciosos conocidos, las infecciones fúngicas invasoras y profilaxis antimicrobiana.
The Committee of Infections in Immunocompromised Patients of the Chilean Society of Infectious Diseases presents an update in the Management of febrile neutropenia in adults and children with cancer. It comes from the significant changes that occurred in recent years in the confrontation of these patients. For which a multidisciplinary task force group developed recommendations in relation to their initial handling, laboratory exams required, the initial empirical antimicrobial treatment and in front of known infectious focus, invasive fungal infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Consensus , Febrile Neutropenia/diagnosis , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Febrile Neutropenia/etiology , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Communicable Diseases/chemically induced , Consensus , Biological Therapy/standards , Chile , Humans , Opportunistic Infections/chemically induced , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of 2 manuscripts. This second part is a guideline that details these recommendations through screening strategies, prophylactic therapies and vaccines indications for bacterial, mycobacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections, both for adults and children.
Subject(s)
Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Communicable Diseases/chemically induced , Consensus , Emigrants and Immigrants , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/chemically induced , Chile , Female , Hepatitis B/chemically induced , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Humans , Mass Screening , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Resumen La incorporación de terapias biológicas ha significado un gran avance en el manejo de diversas patologías de origen autoinmune, neoplásico u otros. Si bien su uso ha implicado mejoras significativas en el pronóstico de estas enfermedades, no está exento de complicaciones, entre estas, las infecciosas. El objetivo de este consenso fue evaluar el perfil de seguridad, desde la mirada infectológica, de las terapias biológicas de uso más frecuente y dar recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones en pacientes tratados con ellas, basándose en la evidencia de mayor calidad disponible para los biológicos seleccionados. El consenso cuenta de dos manuscritos. Esta primera parte detalla los riesgos de desarrollar complicaciones infecciosas dependiendo del tipo de biológico utilizado para determinada patología. La revisión incluyó búsqueda amplia en MEDLINE y Epistemonikos de revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis de estudios clínicos controlados y caso/control que examinaban infecciones posteriores al tratamiento con anti-TNF alfa, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig y anti-integrinas. Esta búsqueda se complementó con revisión de cohortes multicéntricas de usuarios de biológicos, del MMWR del CDC, Atlanta, E.U.A. y de registros nacionales y/o de sociedades científicas en la que se hiciera mención a complicaciones infecciosas derivadas del uso de biológicos.
The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.
Subject(s)
Humans , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Communicable Diseases/chemically induced , Consensus , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Biological Therapy/standards , Opportunistic Infections/chemically induced , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Chile , Risk Factors , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
Resumen La incorporación de terapias biológicas ha significado un gran avance en el manejo de diversas patologías de origen autoinmune, neoplásico u otros. Si bien su uso ha implicado mejoras significativas en el pronóstico de estas enfermedades, no está exento de complicaciones, entre éstas, las infecciosas. El objetivo de este consenso fue evaluar el perfil de seguridad, desde la mirada infectológica, de las terapias biológicas de uso más frecuente y dar recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones en pacientes tratados con ellas, basándose en la evidencia de mayor calidad disponible para los biológicos seleccionados. El consenso cuenta de dos manuscritos. Esta segunda parte corresponde a la guía clínica que detalla estas recomendaciones mediante estrategias de cribado, terapias profilácticas e indicación de vacunas, según corresponde, para infecciones bacterianas, y por micobacterias en particular, virus, hongos y parásitos, tanto para adultos como para niños.
The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of 2 manuscripts. This second part is a guideline that details these recommendations through screening strategies, prophylactic therapies and vaccines indications for bacterial, mycobacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections, both for adults and children.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/chemically induced , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Communicable Diseases/chemically induced , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Consensus , Emigrants and Immigrants , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Chile , Mass Screening , Risk Factors , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Assessment , Hepatitis B/chemically induced , Hepatitis B/prevention & controlABSTRACT
This manuscript includes the antiinfective therapeutic resources for immunocompromised patients under chemotherapy by cancer or hematopoietic stem cells transplant (HSCT) receptors. The document presents the antimicrobial therapy indicated in the most prevalent clinical situations in this population and the primary and alternative therapy for some specific microorganisms. The clinical situations included in the analysis are: febrile neutropenia without focus, sepsis, infections of the central nervous system, pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, neutropenic enterocolitis and urinary tract infection. The therapeutic resources, recommended doses and special precautions for the use of antimicrobial recommended in bacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections in this population are described, including the measurement of plasma concentrations of certain drugs in specific situations.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Infections/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Immunocompetence/drug effects , Immunocompromised Host/drug effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Resumen Este documento incluye los recursos terapéuticos antiinfecciosos necesarios para pacientes inmunocomprometidos por terapia de cáncer o receptores de trasplante de precursores hematopoyéticos (TPH). Se aborda la terapia indicada para pacientes con las situaciones clínicas prevalentes en esta población y la terapia indicada para algunos microorganismos específicos. Según presentación clínica, se aborda el manejo de pacientes con: neutropenia febril sin foco, sepsis, infecciones del sistema nervioso central, neumonía, infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos, enterocolitis neutropénica e infección del tracto urinario. Se describe el arsenal terapéutico necesario, las dosis recomendadas y las precauciones especiales para el uso de antibacterianos, antivirales, antifúngicos y antiparasitarios en esta población, incluida la medición de concentraciones plasmáticas de ciertos fármacos en situaciones específicas.
This manuscript includes the antiinfective therapeutic resources for immunocompromised patients under chemotherapy by cancer or hematopoietic stem cells transplant (HSCT) receptors. The document presents the antimicrobial therapy indicated in the most prevalent clinical situations in this population and the primary and alternative therapy for some specific microorganisms. The clinical situations included in the analysis are: febrile neutropenia without focus, sepsis, infections of the central nervous system, pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, neutropenic enterocolitis and urinary tract infection. The therapeutic resources, recommended doses and special precautions for the use of antimicrobial recommended in bacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections in this population are described, including the measurement of plasma concentrations of certain drugs in specific situations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapy , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Immunocompromised Host/drug effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Immunocompetence/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Chile, Andes virus (ANDV) is the sole aetiological agent of hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS) with mean annual incidence of 55 cases, 32% case fatality rate (CFR) and no specific treatment. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) titres at hospital admission correlate inversely with HCPS severity. We designed an open trial to explore safety and efficacy and evaluate pharmacokinetics of immune plasma as a treatment strategy for this disease. METHODS: We performed plasmapheresis on donors at least 6 months after HCPS and measured NAb titres through a focus-reduction neutralization test. Subjects admitted to 10 study sites with suspected/confirmed HCPS were eligible for treatment with immune plasma by intravenous infusion at an ANDV NAb dose of 5,000 U/kg. HCPS was confirmed through immunoglobulin M serology or reverse transcriptase-PCR. The main outcome was mortality within 30 days. RESULTS: From 2008-2012, we enrolled and treated 32 cases and confirmed HCPS in 29. CFR of hantavirus plasma-treated cases was 4/29 (14%); CFR of non-treated cases in the same period in Chile was 63/199 (32%; P=0.049, OR=0.35, CI=0.12, 0.99); CFR of non-treated cases at the same study sites between 2005-2012 was 18/66 (27%; (P=0.15, OR=0.43, CI=0.14, 1.34) and CFR in a previous methylprednisolone treatment study was 20/60 (33%; P=0.052, OR=0.32, CI=0.10, 1.00). We detected no serious adverse events associated to plasma infusion. Plasma NAb titres reached in recipients were variable and viral load remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Human ANDV immune plasma infusion appears safe for HCPS. We observed a decrease in CFR in treated cases with borderline significance that will require further studies for confirmation.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Viral/therapeutic use , Hantavirus Infections/therapy , Immune Sera/pharmacology , RNA, Viral/antagonists & inhibitors , Adult , Female , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Orthohantavirus/drug effects , Orthohantavirus/growth & development , Orthohantavirus/immunology , Hantavirus Infections/immunology , Hantavirus Infections/mortality , Hantavirus Infections/virology , Heart/drug effects , Heart/physiopathology , Heart/virology , Humans , Lung/drug effects , Lung/immunology , Lung/pathology , Lung/virology , Male , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Neutralization Tests , Plasmapheresis , RNA, Viral/blood , RNA, Viral/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis , Syndrome , Viral Load/drug effectsABSTRACT
Pneumocystis jiroveci is an important pathogen in patients undergoing SOT and HSCT. Universal prophylaxis is recommended for all adults and children with SOT and HSCT, considering that its use significantly reduces the occurrence and mortality associated with pneumonia by this agent. The drug of choice is cotrimoxazole (A1) three times a week, low-dose scheme, that has proved equally effective and better tolerated than the daily regimen and/or at high doses. Prophylaxis starts 7 to 14 days post transplant in SOT recipients and post-implant in HSCT, with an average duration of 6 months except in liver and lung transplant as in HSCT with significant degree of immunosuppression, that lasts for 1 year. Alternatives for prophylaxis are dapsone (B2), aerosolized pentamidine (B2) and atovaquone (C2).
Pneumocystis jiroveci es un patógeno importante en pacientes sometidos a TOS y TPH. Se recomienda proilaxis universal a todos los pacientes adultos y niños sometidos a TOS o TPH porque su uso reduce signiicati-vamente la ocurrencia y mortalidad asociada a neumonía por este agente. El medicamento de elección es cotrimoxa-zol (A1) tres veces por semana, en dosis bajas, esquema que ha demostrado igual eicacia y mejor tolerancia que el esquema diario y/o con dosis altas. La proilaxis se inicia 7 a 14 días post trasplante en TOS y posterior al implante en TPH, con una duración promedio de 6 meses salvo en trasplante de hígado y pulmón en que se prolonga por 1 año, al igual que en TPH con grado importante de inmunosupresión. Son alternativas de profilaxis dapsona (B2), pentamidina aerosolizada (B2) y atavacuona (C2).
Subject(s)
Adult , Child , Humans , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Organ Transplantation , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/prevention & control , Stem Cell Transplantation , Drug Administration Schedule , Dapsone/administration & dosage , Evidence-Based Medicine , Incidence , Pneumocystis carinii , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pentamidine/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/microbiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Pneumocystis jiroveci is an important pathogen in patients undergoing SOT and HSCT. Universal prophylaxis is recommended for all adults and children with SOT and HSCT, considering that its use significantly reduces the occurrence and mortality associated with pneumonia by this agent. The drug of choice is cotrimoxazole (A1) three times a week, low-dose scheme, that has proved equally effective and better tolerated than the daily regimen and/or at high doses. Prophylaxis starts 7 to 14 days post transplant in SOT recipients and post-implant in HSCT, with an average duration of 6 months except in liver and lung transplant as in HSCT with significant degree of immunosuppression, that lasts for 1 year. Alternatives for prophylaxis are dapsone (B2), aerosolized pentamidine (B2) and atovaquone (C2).
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Organ Transplantation , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/prevention & control , Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Child , Dapsone/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Incidence , Pentamidine/administration & dosage , Pneumocystis carinii , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Pneumocystis/microbiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/administration & dosageABSTRACT
We present the case of a 12-year-old boy with acute lymphocytic leukemia who developed pneumonia and multiple brain infarcts compatible with acute necrotic encephalitis. The infectious disease screening tests revealed influenza A H1N1 virus, Staphylococcus aureus in broncho alveolar lavage, E. coli and galactomannan antigen in blood. CNS influenza associated complications are reviewed. This case highlights the importance of magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of immunocompromised patients with CNS compromise and the value of brain biopsy in the final identification of an infectious disease etiology.
Subject(s)
Encephalitis, Viral/virology , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/virology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/immunology , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/microbiology , Child , Encephalitis, Viral/immunology , Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Influenza, Human/immunology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosisABSTRACT
The severity and duration of post chemotherapy neutropenia were recognized during the 1960s as main predisposing factors for infections in cancer patients. At the beginning of the 70's a standard management approach for all febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes was proposed, based on hospitalization and intravenous empirical broad spectrum antibiotic therapy. Widespread use of this approach resulted in a significant reduction in mortality attributable to bacterial infections. During the last 10 to 15 years, reappraisal of this standard approach has been done by several research groups who question the benefit of treating all FN patients similarly without taking in to consideration differences in severity of the FN episodes. This reappraisal has led during the 1990s to the development of the concept of high and low risk FN episodes that has been the base for the adoption of selective therapies based on the risk categorization of the individual patient. The Chilean Infectious Diseases Society called upon two government National Programs responsible for the appropriate distribution of chemotherapeutic drugs to all pediatric and adults cancer patients within the public health system, and upon the Chilean Hematology Society for the development of a Consensus on Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Infections during FN Episodes in Cancer patients. The need for this Consensus is based on two main aspects: the new approaches proposed during the past year for management of these episodes, and the increasing population of cancer patients receiving improved chemotherapeutic agents that has increased there survival possibilities as well as there possibility to suffer a FN episode. The topics discussed in this document are based on an updated systematic and analytic review of the medical literature including epidemiology, laboratory diagnostics, risk categorization, treatment and prophylaxis. National data was included when available in order to provide the healthcare personnel that take care of these patients with best evidence based recommendations adjusted to the Chilean reality.
