Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Waste Manag ; 33(3): 536-9, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23009924

ABSTRACT

Based on a recent survey of German composting plants an evaluation of costs and benefits of composting was attempted. In this regard, several economical, ecological and legal aspects and some interrelations are discussed in this paper. A special emphasis is placed on the fees and compost prices of composting plants. It is also shown how the legal framework provides the economic basis for composting in Germany, how economical and ecological costs and benefits could be assessed, and why it is so difficult to determine the value of composting.


Subject(s)
Ecology/economics , Ecology/legislation & jurisprudence , Soil , Germany
3.
Waste Manag ; 31(4): 644-8, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21145722

ABSTRACT

In order to reduce the ecological impact of resource exploitation, the EU calls for sustainable options to increase the efficiency and productivity of the utilization of natural resources. This target can only be achieved by considering resource recovery from waste comprehensively. However, waste management measures have to be investigated critically and all aspects of substance-related recycling and energy recovery have to be carefully balanced. This article compares recovery methods for selected waste fractions with regard to their energy efficiency. Whether material recycling or energy recovery is the most energy efficient solution, is a question of particular relevance with regard to the following waste fractions: paper and cardboard, plastics and biowaste and also indirectly metals. For the described material categories material recycling has advantages compared to energy recovery. In accordance with the improved energy efficiency of substance opposed to energy recovery, substance-related recycling causes lower emissions of green house gases. For the fractions paper and cardboard, plastics, biowaste and metals it becomes apparent, that intensification of the separate collection systems in combination with a more intensive use of sorting technologies can increase the extent of material recycling. Collection and sorting systems must be coordinated. The objective of the overall system must be to achieve an optimum of the highest possible recovery rates in combination with a high quality of recyclables. The energy efficiency of substance related recycling of biowaste can be increased by intensifying the use of anaerobic technologies. In order to increase the energy efficiency of the overall system, the energy efficiencies of energy recovery plants must be increased so that the waste unsuitable for substance recycling is recycled or treated with the highest possible energy yield.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources/methods , Refuse Disposal/methods , Anaerobiosis , Conservation of Natural Resources/economics , Efficiency , Metals , Paper , Plastics , Refuse Disposal/economics , Waste Products/analysis , Waste Products/classification
4.
Waste Manag ; 24(1): 43-51, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14672725

ABSTRACT

Biodegradable (compostable) packaging materials made from biopolymers (BP) are introduced into the market to reduce the amounts of conventional packaging materials and at the same time be recovered by the municipal organic waste collection system. The processing of this organic waste mixed with biopolymers has been tested in a commercial treatment facility. The safe use of the compost produced from these materials was demonstrated in a full-scale agricultural application test.


Subject(s)
Biopolymers/metabolism , Conservation of Natural Resources , Product Packaging , Refuse Disposal , Agriculture , Biodegradation, Environmental , Fertilizers , Germany
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...