Nonoperative Management of Olecranon Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Despite increased utilization of conservative measures for displaced olecranon fractures in elderly patients, in whom operative fixation may be complicated by coexisting comorbidities and declining bone quality, the noninferiority of nonoperative management has yet to be proven. The purpose of this study was to review nonoperative management of displaced olecranon fractures in the elderly patient population. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was performed using the term olecranon fracture. Papers included those with results for patients aged 65 years and older published between 1990 and 2018 in the English language. Data were pooled to analyze outcomes and complications of nonoperative management of olecranon fractures in the elderly patient population. RESULTS: Four eligible studies combined for a total of 69 patients with 70 fractures with an average age of 83.8 years (71-95 years), female predominance of 88%, and a mean follow-up of 12.4 months who underwent nonoperative management of displaced olecranon fractures. While only 25% of fractures went on to radiographic union, the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 16.9 (0-59.6), the mean arc of motion was 138°, and 92% of patients achieved excellent results. One-quarter (26%) of the patients experienced complications: radial head subluxation (1), skin sore (1), degenerative arthropathy (1), pain on movement (2), click in movement of the elbow (5), and local pain (8). CONCLUSION: Displaced olecranon fractures in patients aged older than 70 years may be effectively managed with nonoperative measures to produce high satisfaction and functional range of motion.

Orthopaedists Versus Radiologists: A Prospective Comparison of Radiographic Interpretation Between Orthopaedists and Radiologists at a Level I Trauma Center.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the difference in response time, accuracy of radiographic interpretation, and frequency of changes in clinical management necessary after inaccurate reads when comparing orthopaedic and radiology providers. Data including provider response time, accuracy of radiographic interpretation and the frequency of changes in clinical management necessary after imaging reads was collected over a continuous two-month period at a Level I Trauma center. A total of 188 orthopedic injuries involving imaging were included. Orthopedic providers responded 203.2 minutes sooner than radiology providers. Accuracy of radiographic interpretation of the orthopaedic and radiology providers was 100% and 91%, respectively. Frequency of changes in clinical management after inaccurate interpretation of imaging by the orthopaedic and radiology provider was 0% and 7.6%, respectively. Based on our study, orthopaedic providers are significantly faster, more accurate, and make fewer mistakes affecting patient care while interpreting images of orthopaedic injuries than our radiology colleagues. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(2):093-096, 2021).