Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 31(5): 517-9, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18432604

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive value of a combination of the 1 h 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) and second-trimester ultrasound measurement of fetal abdominal circumference (AC) in identifying patients who will go on to deliver small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates. The individual predictive power of these tests has been indicated by previous studies, but this study examines the combined use of these indicators in predicting SGA. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 576 consecutive patients with singleton gestations examined over a 3-year period. Patients' electronic medical records were abstracted to obtain the result of the GCT, the fetal AC measured by ultrasound examination between 18 and 22 weeks' gestation, and the birth weight. SGA and small AC were defined as birth weight or AC < 10(th) percentile for gestational age, according to published nomograms. A low GCT was defined as < 100 mg/dL. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The prevalence of SGA in the study population was 8.7% (50/576). The frequency of SGA neonates was significantly higher in patients with a low GCT (27/207) in the second trimester than in those with a normal GCT (23/369) (13% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.005). Similarly, the frequency of SGA neonates was higher among patients with fetal AC < 10(th) percentile than among those with a normal fetal AC on second-trimester ultrasound examination (17% vs. 8%, P = 0.08), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Of interest, among patients with both a small fetal AC and a low GCT the incidence of SGA neonates was 32% (6/19), but there were no SGA neonates among those with a small AC and normal GCT (0/17) (P = 0.014). Among patients with a small fetal AC the sensitivity of using low GCT to predict subsequent delivery of a SGA neonate was 100%, with a specificity of 57%, positive predictive value 32% and negative predictive value 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Small AC on routine second-trimester anomaly sonogram should trigger a closer evaluation of maternal GCT. If the GCT is also low, more intensive surveillance for the possible development of a SGA infant is warranted.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/embryology , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Infant, Small for Gestational Age/blood , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Female , Glucose , Glucose Tolerance Test/methods , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, Second/blood , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 24(4): 399-401, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15343593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Fetal size is a common criterion for the selection of an individual fetus to be reduced during multifetal pregnancy reduction. We investigated whether a difference in crown-rump length (CRL) exists between male and female fetuses at 9-13 weeks' gestation. METHODS: A total of 883 singleton pregnancies was evaluated at the time of chorionic villus sampling. The mean gestational age at the time of intervention was 10.9 weeks. Pregnancies were dated by certain last menstrual period (LMP). Pregnancies with uncertain dating by LMP or with a sonographic difference of gestational age > 1 week compared with LMP were excluded, as were all cases with chromosomal abnormalities. CRL differences between male and female fetuses were compared using Student's t-test. RESULTS: A total of 417 female and 466 male fetuses fulfilled our study criteria. Their gestational ages ranged between 9.3 and 13.9 weeks. We found no significant difference in size between the male and female fetuses. CONCLUSION: Using the CRL to guide multifetal pregnancy reduction should not result in a clinically significant selection of either gender.


Subject(s)
Crown-Rump Length , Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal , Pregnancy, Multiple , Sex Characteristics , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Sex Factors
3.
J Matern Fetal Med ; 10(2): 127-30, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11392593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the rate of recurrent preterm delivery and the combined costs of mother/infant care for patients with a history of preterm delivery cared for in an inner city hospital house staff (HS) clinic versus an inner city managed care organization (MCO). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The groups consisted of 96 patients with a history of preterm delivery who were cared for by the HS clinic and 164 patients cared for in a neighborhood MCO. All patients with a history of previous preterm delivery who delivered at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1996 were included in the study. The groups were examined regarding source of prenatal care for the subsequent pregnancy (HS vs. MCO), baseline demographics, intensity of prenatal care, maternal and neonatal outcomes and total cost of the provision of care. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline demographics between the groups. There was a higher rate of recurrent prematurity for patients cared for by the MCO (HS, 24% vs. MCO, 36%, p = 0.04). Mean total mother/infant costs were also higher in the MCO group ($13565) when compared to the HS group ($9082), (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: While some MCOs may provide cost savings for some low-risk populations, our study demonstrates that this health-care delivery system resulted in greater total expenditures for patients with a history of preterm delivery.


Subject(s)
Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Managed Care Programs/economics , Obstetric Labor, Premature/economics , Obstetric Labor, Premature/epidemiology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/economics , Prenatal Care/economics , Adult , Baltimore/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University/economics , Hospitals, Urban/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Patient Admission/economics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prenatal Care/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 96(6): 1011-3, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11084195

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether standardized patients' perceptions of medical students' ethnicity influenced ratings on the interpersonal skills subsection of the objective standardized clinical examination (OSCE) and performance overall on the OSCE. METHODS: The OSCE is used to evaluate medical students' performances in the obstetrics and gynecology basic clerkship at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. It is based on a series of standardized patient interviews conducted by medical students and incorporates ratings by standardized patients on each student's interpersonal skills. Medical students (n = 353) enrolled in the obstetrics and gynecology basic clerkship from 1995-1998 were classified according to ethnicity. Overall OSCE scores according to ethnicity were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Total interpersonal skills scores and scores on the individual components of the interpersonal skills section of the OSCE were analyzed according to students' ethnicity using the Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparametric analysis of variance. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among ethnic groups in overall OSCE scores, total interpersonal skills scores, or scores on the individual components of the interpersonal skills section of the OSCE. CONCLUSION: No bias attributable to perceived medical student ethnicity that affects performance on the OSCE exists.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate , Educational Measurement , Ethnicity/education , Gynecology/education , Obstetrics/education , Physician-Patient Relations , Baltimore , Bias , Curriculum , Hospitals, University , Humans
5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 95(4): 502-6, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10725480

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of predicted birth weight by the gestation-adjusted projection method using ultrasonographic measurements obtained just before and at term. METHODS: The study group comprised patients with singleton pregnancies who underwent sonograms between 34.0 and 36.9 weeks' gestation (period 1) and at 37 weeks and beyond (period 2). The mean error in birth weight prediction, absolute birth weight error, and signed and absolute percent errors were compared with paired t tests. Thus, each patient served as her own control. RESULTS: The study included 138 patients undergoing 276 sonograms. The mean absolute error of the predicted birth weight was smaller for period 1 than for period 2 (197 +/- 167 g compared with 235 +/- 209 g, P =.019). The mean absolute percent error was 6.2 +/- 5.2% for period 1 compared with 7.4 +/- 6.3% for period 2 (P =.019). These same trends were observed when fetuses with suspected growth abnormalities were examined separately. Averaging data from both gestational periods did not improve the prediction of birth weight. CONCLUSION: Sonograms between 34.0 and 36. 9 weeks' gestation allow for more accurate prediction of birth weight than sonograms later in gestation. Though these differences are small and not clinically significant, this study indicates that serial sonograms in the late third trimester do not improve the ability to predict birth weight, even in abnormally grown fetuses. A single sonogram between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation is recommended for prediction of birth weight.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third
6.
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns ; 5(4): 177, 1998 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10838328

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare perinatal outcomes and total health care costs for patients with a previous history of preterm delivery (PTD) cared for in an inner-city university hospital house staff (HS) clinic vs pregnant patients who have not received any prenatal care (NPC).Study Design: We conducted a retrospective review of pregnant women with a history of PTD delivered at our institution between January 1994 and December 1996. Inclusion criteria were a history of at least one previous PTD. Prenatal care was given in a comprehensive setting in a teaching hospital. Exclusion criteria were infants with major malformations and multiple gestations. Data were obtained on maternal demographics and history of prenatal visits.Results: The study groups consisted of 96 HS and 53 NPC patients. There were no differences in maternal demographics, however, the number of prior preterm births was greater in the NPC group (1.59 vs 1.23, P =.003). The incidence of recurrent PTD (<34 weeks) was greater in the NPC group (49% vs 13%, P = <.001). The mean gestational age at time of delivery was decreased in the NPC group (33 weeks vs 37.2 weeks, P = <.001). The length of NICU stay was greater in the NPC group (15.6 vs 3.1 days, P =.001). The mean birth weight was less in the NPC group (2172 g vs 2786 g, P = <.001). The mean total mother-infant costs were significantly less in the HS group ($7,127 vs $18,047, P =.003). Even HS patients with only one prenatal visit had a significantly lower incidence of PTD (16% vs 75%, P =.04).Conclusions: Inner-city patients with a history of PTD who received even minimal prenatal care in a university HS clinic had a significantly lower incidence of recurrent PTD than those who had no prenatal care. Prenatal care also lowers total health care costs in women with a history of PTD. The coordinated multidisciplinary aspect of care provided at academic centers may have a positive impact on the problem of PTD.

7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 177(5): 1035-7, 1997 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9396888

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the costs of prenatal care and subsequent maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes cared for in an inner-city university hospital house staff clinic versus an inner-city managed care organization. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The groups consisted of 115 patients with gestational diabetes who were cared for in a house staff clinic and a demographically similar group of 85 patients cared for in a neighborhood managed care organization. The groups were examined regarding baseline demographics, intensity of prenatal care, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and total cost of the provision of care. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in the total cost of maternal-infant care. A larger percentage of patients in the house staff group saw the physician frequently. In contrast, patients cared for in the managed care organization underwent more tests of fetal well-being. There was a greater rate of neonatal macrosomia in the managed care organization group compared with the house staff group. CONCLUSIONS: Managed care does not decrease the cost of caring for patients with gestational diabetes but does lead to a greater rate of neonatal macrosomia, which may reflect poorer glucose control.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Health Care Costs , Managed Care Programs , Prenatal Care , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
9.
Cancer Res ; 45(9 Suppl): 4619s-4620s, 1985 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2990695

ABSTRACT

PIP: The occurrence of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in Haitians and Haitian-Americans has remained an enigmatic aspect of the AIDS mystery. Although Haitians are currently classified as a high risk group, this designation has been disputed. The incidence of AIDS in recent Haitian immigrants to the US has been estimated at 84/100,000, which is lower than the 200-240/100,000 figure put forward for other risk groups. To better understand the spread of AIDS within the Haitian population, a serologic study of human T-lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III) seropostivity was performed on 88 healthy Haitians and 21 Haitians with AIDS in New York City. 95.2% of Haitian AIDS patients compared with only 1.1% of controls had a positive ELISA for HTLV-III infection. The low rate of seropositivity in health Haitians contrasts sharply with the prevalence of seropositivity noted in other high risk groups. For example, HTLV-III antibodies have been detected in 53% of healthy New York homosexuals and over 60% of drug users in New York and New Jersey. A likely explanation is that only a small segment of Haitian-Americans are really at risk of HTLV-III infection, and that this risk is conferred not by practices widespread in the Haitian community but by homosexuality, drug abuse, blood transfusions, or other as yet unidentified modes of transmission. Support for this thesis is provided by data from Haiti, where AIDS cases have been associated with bisexuality, an extremely high prevalence of veneral diseases, and contact with prostitutes. It is concluded that the designation of the entire Haitian community as a high risk group for AIDS may be inappropriate.^ieng


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/epidemiology , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/etiology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Emigration and Immigration , Female , HIV Antibodies , Haiti/ethnology , Hemophilia A , Homosexuality , Humans , Male , Retroviridae Infections/epidemiology , Risk , Sexual Behavior , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...