Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hum Evol ; 113: 1-9, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29054159

ABSTRACT

From the Miocene Sahelanthropus tchadensis to Pleistocene Homo sapiens, hominins are characterized by a derived anterior position of the foramen magnum relative to basicranial structures. It has been previously suggested that the anterior position of the foramen magnum in hominins is related to bipedal locomotor behavior. Yet, the functional relationship between foramen magnum position and bipedal locomotion remains unclear. Recent studies, using ratios based on cranial linear measurements, have found a link between the anterior position of the foramen magnum and bipedalism in several mammalian clades: marsupials, rodents, and primates. In the present study, we compute these ratios in a sample including a more comprehensive dataset of extant hominoids and fossil hominins. First, we verify if the values of ratios can distinguish extant humans from apes. Then, we test whether extinct hominins can be distinguished from non-bipedal extant hominoids. Finally, we assess if the studied ratios are effective predictors of bipedal behavior by testing if they mainly relate to variation in foramen magnum position rather than changes in other cranial structures. Our results confirm that the ratios discriminate between extant bipeds and non-bipeds. However, the only ratio clearly discriminating between fossil hominins and other extant apes is that which only includes basicranial structures. We show that a large proportion of the interspecific variation in the other ratios relates to changes in facial, rather than basicranial, structures. In this context, we advocate the use of measurements based only on basicranial structures when assessing the relationship between foramen magnum position and bipedalism in future studies.


Subject(s)
Foramen Magnum/anatomy & histology , Fossils , Hominidae/anatomy & histology , Locomotion , Animals , Female , Foramen Magnum/physiology , Hominidae/physiology , Humans
2.
J Anat ; 230(1): 85-105, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27503252

ABSTRACT

Because brains do not fossilize, the internal surface of the braincase (endocast) serves as an important source of information about brain growth, development, and evolution. Recent studies of endocranial morphology and development in great apes, fossil hominins, and modern humans have revealed taxon-specific differences. However, it remains to be investigated to which extent differences in endocranial morphology reflect differences in actual brain morphology and development, and to which extent they reflect different interactions of the brain and its case with the cranial base and face. Here we address this question by analyzing the effects of cranial integration on endocranial morphology. We test the 'spatial packing' and 'facial orientation' hypotheses, which propose that size and orientation of the neurocranium relative to the viscerocranium influence endocranial shape. Results show that a substantial proportion of endocranial shape variation along and across ontogenetic trajectories is due to cranial integration. Specifically, the uniquely globular shape of the human endocast mainly results from the combination of an exceptionally large brain with a comparatively small face. Overall, thus, cranial integration has pervasive effects on endocranial morphology, and only a comparatively small proportion of inter- and intra-taxon variation can directly be associated with variation in brain morphology.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Brain/anatomy & histology , Hominidae/anatomy & histology , Skull/anatomy & histology , Age Factors , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Skull Base/anatomy & histology
3.
Curr Biol ; 26(14): R665-6, 2016 07 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27458909

ABSTRACT

While the braincase of adult Neanderthals had a similar volume to that of modern humans from the same period, differences in endocranial shape suggest that brain morphology differed between modern humans and Neanderthals. When and how these differences arose during evolution and development is a topic of ongoing research, with potential implications for species-specific differences in brain and cognitive development, and in life history [1,2]. Earlier research suggested that Neanderthals followed an ancestral mode of brain development, similar to that of our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees [2-4]. Modern humans, by contrast, were suggested to follow a uniquely derived mode of brain development just after birth, giving rise to the characteristically globular shape of the adult human brain case [2,4,5]. Here, we re-examine this hypothesis using an extended sample of Neanderthal infants. We document endocranial development during the decisive first two years of postnatal life. The new data indicate that Neanderthals followed largely similar modes of endocranial development to modern humans. These findings challenge the notion that human brain and cognitive development after birth is uniquely derived [2,4].


Subject(s)
Brain/growth & development , Fossils/anatomy & histology , Neanderthals/growth & development , Skull/growth & development , Animals , Biological Evolution , Brain/anatomy & histology , Humans , Neanderthals/anatomy & histology , Skull/anatomy & histology
4.
Am J Phys Anthropol ; 145(2): 231-46, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21365614

ABSTRACT

Modern humans are characterized by their large, complex, and specialized brain. Human brain evolution can be addressed through direct evidence provided by fossil hominid endocasts (i.e. paleoneurology), or through indirect evidence of extant species comparative neurology. Here we use the second approach, providing an extant comparative framework for hominid paleoneurological studies. We explore endocranial size and shape differences among great apes and humans, as well as between sexes. We virtually extracted 72 endocasts, sampling all extant great ape species and modern humans, and digitized 37 landmarks on each for 3D generalized Procrustes analysis. All species can be differentiated by their endocranial shape. Among great apes, endocranial shapes vary from short (orangutans) to long (gorillas), perhaps in relation to different facial orientations. Endocranial shape differences among African apes are partly allometric. Major endocranial traits distinguishing humans from great apes are endocranial globularity, reflecting neurological reorganization, and features linked to structural responses to posture and bipedal locomotion. Human endocasts are also characterized by posterior location of foramina rotunda relative to optic canals, which could be correlated to lesser subnasal prognathism compared to living great apes. Species with larger brains (gorillas and humans) display greater sexual dimorphism in endocranial size, while sexual dimorphism in endocranial shape is restricted to gorillas, differences between males and females being at least partly due to allometry. Our study of endocranial variations in extant great apes and humans provides a new comparative dataset for studies of fossil hominid endocasts.


Subject(s)
Brain/anatomy & histology , Hominidae/anatomy & histology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Skull/anatomy & histology , Analysis of Variance , Anatomy, Comparative , Animals , Cluster Analysis , Databases, Factual , Female , Fossils , Humans , Male , Models, Statistical , Organ Size , Principal Component Analysis , Sex Characteristics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Arch Oral Biol ; 53(11): 1030-6, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18755449

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to characterize the radicular pattern diversity and evolution of murine molars. It aimed at identifying new morphological characters in order to improve our understanding of rodent diversity and systematics. METHODS: A non-invasive technique was applied to extant and extinct murine species. For each molar, a virtual slice was computed from X-ray microtomographic data to visualize root number and arrangement. A geometric morphometric study was then conducted on first upper molars on a sample of 40 specimens, representing 10 species of the tribe Arvicanthini. RESULTS: The radicular pattern enabled to retrieve phylogenetic murine groups settled by molecular data. Apodemus species, Malacomys longipes, Mus musculus, and species of the Praomys group all displayed a primitive pattern which consisted in two roots in each of their lower molars. Phloeomys cumingi and Batomys granti displayed singular root arrangements derived from this primitive pattern. Arvicanthini were distinguishable from all other African murines by their high root number. In addition, Procrustes analysis on first upper molars clustered specimens according to their genera. CONCLUSIONS: An evolutionary trend toward increasing the molar root number is shown in many murine groups. The increased complexity of root pattern occurs by a progressive splitting of the primitive pattern. The fossil record shows that the increase in the root number within Arvicanthini was initiated at least 7 Myr ago. Root number and root positioning are demonstrated to be characteristics equivalent to those of the crown in murine rodent evolutionary studies.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Genetic Variation , Molar/anatomy & histology , Murinae/anatomy & histology , Tooth Root/anatomy & histology , Animals , Fossils , Molar/diagnostic imaging , Murinae/classification , Murinae/genetics , Phylogeny , Species Specificity , Tooth Root/diagnostic imaging , X-Ray Microtomography/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...