A mastery learning approach to education about fall risk and gait assessment.

Mastery learning is a form of competency-based education in which learning time varies but outcomes are uniform. Trainees must meet a minimum passing standard (MPS) before completing a mastery learning curriculum. The objective of this study was to establish a curriculum for fall risk and gait assessment for medical students, determine an MPS for a fall risk and gait assessment clinical skills examination (CSE), and apply the MPS to a sample of medical students completing a fall risk and gait assessment CSE. Medical students completed an interactive session about fall risk and gait assessment including the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and completed deliberate practice with 3 patients. Skills were evaluated using an 18-item skills checklist. A panel of clinical experts set the MPS at 82%. Eighty-seven medical students participated. The average score on the checklist was 14.7 of 18 (81.4%.) Although almost all performed the TUG correctly, only 61% met the MPS for the checklist. Our results suggest that a mastery learning approach may better prepare the 39% of students that did not meet MPS to complete a fall risk and gait assessment.

Learning through Teaching: Peer Teaching and Mentoring Experiences among Third-Year Medical Students.

PHENOMENON: Classroom studies of peer-led teaching and mentoring report benefits for students both as teachers and learners. Such benefits include both improved content mastery and personal and professional development. While benefits of peer-led teaching in the clinical setting have been well characterized among other health professions, less is known within undergraduate medical education. In this study, we explored medical students' perceptions and experiences relevant to peer teaching and mentoring in outpatient clinical clerkships. APPROACH: Third-year medical students enrolled in two different longitudinal primary care clerkships, Education Centered Medical Home (ECMH) or Individual Preceptorship (IP), participated in semi-structured interviews in 2018. Students were asked to describe their peer teaching experiences during the clerkship and to reflect on their experiences serving as role models or mentors. We analyzed transcripts utilizing a two-cycle team-based inductive approach. FINDINGS: Thirty-three students completed interviews. We derived three main themes: (1) diversity of peer teaching and mentoring opportunities, (2) transitioning one's role from learner to teacher, and (3) personal and professional development. While participants from both clerkships participated in peer teaching and mentoring experiences, ECMH students described more opportunities to interact with students across all years of medical school training, noting that "getting that guidance and in turn being able to teach is a valuable experience." ECMH students further perceived the responsibility of creating a comfortable learning environment for others. Students from both clerkships reflected on 'learning through teaching,' that teaching served as a reaffirmation of the knowledge they gained, and that teaching experience contributed to their personal and professional growth. INSIGHTS: Students perceived their participation in peer teaching and mentoring experiences in the clinical setting as contributing positively to personal and professional development. Students from both clerkships reflected on their teaching and mentoring opportunities as a facilitator of growth in their own teaching skills; ECMH students further described a heightened sense of self-confidence and fulfillment. These findings highlight the importance of creating learning environments that foster peer teaching and mentoring, as such opportunities may lead to further growth as a learner and as a physician.

A Brief Dermatology Curriculum in Skin Cancer Detection and Prevention to Improve Medical Student Knowledge and Confidence.

Introduction: While the incidence of skin cancers continues to rise, there remains a disproportionate lack of introductory training on skin cancer screening and identification of modifiable behaviors in medical curricula. Trainees and students have cited low confidence in their ability to counsel patients and lack of instruction as barriers. Methods: To address this need, we created a 1-hour didactic lecture based on a cognitive teaching framework for third-year medical students during their core primary care clerkship. The session highlighted visual identification of different skin cancers, factors increasing individual risk, and photoprotective behaviors. Session content was based on American Academy of Dermatology recommendations for skin cancer prevention. An assessment of knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes given before, immediately following, and at 6 months after the session was used to determine efficacy. Results: One hundred eight students before and immediately after the session demonstrated significantly improved knowledge (mean correct: 71% presession vs. 99% postintervention, p < .0001). Based on 39 participants completing 6-month follow-up, knowledge remained improved (mean answered correctly: 80%, p < .0001). Confidence in patient counseling on preventive behaviors, risk assessment, and reported likelihood of counseling significantly increased across the three time points (p < .0001 for all attitude questions). Specific topics included appropriate referral to a dermatologist, sunscreen application, and dangers of indoor tanning bed usage. Discussion: Our session on skin cancer screening and prevention demonstrated improvements in medical student knowledge, confidence, and patient counseling likelihood. This introductory curriculum could be adapted for multiple core clerkships or specialties.

Continuity With Patients, Preceptors, and Peers Improves Primary Care Training: A Randomized Medical Education Trial.

PURPOSE: Infusing continuity of care into medical student clerkships may accelerate professional development, preserve patient-centered attitudes, and improve primary care training. However, prospective, randomized studies of longitudinal curricula are lacking. METHOD: All entering Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine students in 2015 and 2016 were randomized to the Education Centered Medical Home (ECMH), a 4-year, team-based primary care clerkship; or a mentored individual preceptorship (IP) for 2 years followed by a traditional 4-week primary care clerkship. Students were surveyed 4 times (baseline, M1, M2, and M3 year [through 2018]); surveys included the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI); the Communication, Curriculum, and Culture (C3) survey assessing the hidden curriculum; and the Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams (ATHCT) scale. The authors analyzed results using an intent-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-nine students were randomized; 316 (96%) participated in surveys. Seventy percent of all respondents would recommend the ECMH to incoming first-year students. ECMH students reported a more positive learning environment (overall quality, 4.4 ECMH vs 4.0 IP, P < .001), greater team-centered attitudes (ATHCT scale, 3.2 vs 3.0, P = .007), less exposure to negative aspects of the hidden curriculum (C3 scale, 4.6 vs 4.3, P < .001), and comparable medical knowledge acquisition. ECMH students established more continuity relationships with patients (2.2 vs 0.3, P < .001) and reported significantly higher professional efficacy (MBI-PE, 4.1 vs 3.9, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized medical education trial, the ECMH provided superior primary care training across multiple outcomes compared with a traditional clerkship-based model, including improved professional efficacy.

Perceptions of Patient-Centered Care among First-Year Medical Students.

Phenomenon: Teaching patient-centered care (PCC) is a key component of undergraduate medical curricula. Prior frameworks of PCC describe multiple domains of patient-centeredness, ranging from interpersonal encounters to systems-level issues. Medical students' perceptions of PCC are thought to erode as they progress through school, but little is known about how students view PCC toward the beginning of training. This study explores the perceptions of PCC among 1st-year medical students to inform curricular development and evaluation. Approach: Medical students participated in semistructured, in-person interviews within 4 months of starting medical school as part of a longitudinal study. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach and the constant comparative method to describe responses and characterize emergent themes. Transcripts were reviewed to compare codes and compile a final codebook. Findings: Thirty-eight students completed interviews. Students provided heterogeneous definitions of PCC, including perceptions that PCC is implicit and obvious. Many students were unable to provide a concrete definition of PCC, juxtaposing PCC with other priorities such as profit- or physician-centered care, whereas others thought the term was jargon. Some participants defined PCC as upholding patient values using hypothetical examples centered around physician behavior. Insights: Although students appeared to enter medical school with a range of perceptions about PCC, many of their descriptions were limited and only scratch the surface of existing frameworks. Rather than their perceptions of PCC eroding during medical school, students may never fully develop a foundational understanding of PCC. Our findings reinforce the need for authentic, clinically experiential learning opportunities that promote PCC from the earliest stages of medical education.

Promoting Responsible Electronic Documentation: Validity Evidence for a Checklist to Assess Progress Notes in the Electronic Health Record.

Construct: We aimed to develop an instrument to measure the quality of inpatient electronic health record- (EHR-) generated progress notes without requiring raters to review the detailed chart or know the patient. BACKGROUND: Notes written in EHRs have generated criticism for being unnecessarily long and redundant, perpetuating inaccuracy and obscuring providers' clinical reasoning. Available assessment tools either focus on outpatient progress notes or require chart review by raters to develop familiarity with the patient. APPROACH: We used medical literature, local expert review, and attending focus groups to develop and refine an instrument to evaluate inpatient progress notes. We measured interrater reliability and scored the selected-response elements of the checklist for a sample of 100 progress notes written by PGY-1 trainees on the general medicine service. RESULTS: We developed an instrument with 18 selected-response items and four open-ended items to measure the quality of inpatient progress notes written in the EHR. The mean Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated good agreement at .67. The mean note score was 66.9% of maximum possible points (SD = 10.6, range = 34.4%-93.3%). CONCLUSIONS: We present validity evidence in the domains of content, internal structure, and response process for a new checklist for rating inpatient progress notes. The scored checklist can be completed in approximately 7 minutes by a rater who is not familiar with the patient and can be done without extensive chart review. We further demonstrate that trainee notes show substantial room for improvement.

Four-Year Educational and Patient Care Outcomes of a Team-Based Primary Care Longitudinal Clerkship.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal clerkships show promise in improving undergraduate primary care education. This study examines the Education-Centered Medical Home (ECMH), a longitudinal clerkship embedding teams of students across all four years into primary care clinics to provide patient care and serve as health coaches for high-risk patients. METHOD: All students graduating in 2015 were surveyed to assess attitudes, experiences, and preferences regarding primary care education. ECMH students were compared with students receiving their primary care training in a traditional curriculum (TC) using paired measures of comparison. To assess the impact of the ECMH on patient care quality, authors performed a detailed chart review at one site. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of eligible students participated in the study. ECMH students (n = 69) and TC students (n = 68) had similar baseline academic performance and career interests. ECMH students reported more continuity-of-care experiences, higher satisfaction with their primary care learning climate (86% versus 61% in the EMCH and TC cohorts, respectively), more confidence in their quality improvement skills, and scored higher on measures of perceived patient centeredness. Students from both groups recommended the ECMH (91% and 57%, respectively). Student involvement at one ECMH site was correlated with increased patient contacts and improved delivery of recommended preventive care. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating students longitudinally into primary care clinics is highly rated by students. The ECMH model led to improved continuity, improved perceptions of the learning climate, and higher patient centeredness. Preliminary data suggest that students add value and improve patient outcomes during longitudinal clinical experiences.

Medical students' observations, practices, and attitudes regarding electronic health record documentation.

BACKGROUND: Medical students are increasingly documenting their patient notes in electronic health records (EHRs). Documentation short-cuts, such as copy-paste and templates, have raised concern among clinician-educators because they may perpetuate redundant, inaccurate, or even plagiarized notes. Little is known about medical students' experiences with copy-paste, templates and other "efficiency tools" in EHRs. PURPOSES: We sought to understand medical students' observations, practices, and attitudes regarding electronic documentation efficiency tools. METHODS: We surveyed 3rd-year medical students at one medical school. We asked about efficiency tools including copy-paste, templates, auto-inserted data, and "scribing" (documentation under a supervisor's name). RESULTS: Overall, 123 of 163 students (75%) responded; almost all frequently use an EHR for documentation. Eighty-six percent (102/119) reported at least sometimes observing residents copying data from other providers' notes and 60% (70/116) reported observing attending physicians doing so. Most students (95%, 113/119) reported copying from their own previous notes, and 22% (26/119) reported copying from residents. Only 10% (12/119) indicated that copying from other providers is acceptable, whereas 83% (98/118) believe copying from their own notes is acceptable. Most students use templates and auto-inserted data; 43% (51/120) reported documenting while signed in under an attending's name. Greater use of documentation efficiency tools is associated with plans to enter a procedural specialty and with lack of awareness of the medical school copy-paste policy. CONCLUSIONS: Students frequently use a range of efficiency tools to document in the electronic health record, most commonly copying their own notes. Although the vast majority of students believe it is unacceptable to copy-paste from other providers, most have observed clinical supervisors doing so.