Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 136(2): 559-64, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23053655

ABSTRACT

During the past 50 years, breast cancer incidence has increased by 2-3 % annually. Despite many years of testing for estrogen receptors (ER), evidence is scarce on breast cancer incidence by ER status. The aim of this paper was to investigate the increase in breast cancer incidence by ER status. Data were obtained from the clinical database of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group which holds nationwide data on diagnosis, including pathology, treatment, and follow-up on primary breast cancers since 1977. All Danish women <80 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer 1996-2007 were identified in this prospective register based study. ER status was evaluated using immunohistochemical staining by standardized laboratory methods in the Danish Pathology Departments and reported to the database. From 1996 to 2007, breast cancer incidence increased overall with a tendency to level off after 2002. In all women a significant decrease was found in ER unknown tumors. However, in both pre- and postmenopausal women, significant increases were seen in incidence of ER+ tumors; though the increase levelled off for premenopausal women after 2002. In postmenopausal women, the incidence of ER- breast cancer decreased significantly throughout the period. In women <35 years, we found a minor non-significant increase in both ER+ and ER- tumors. ER unknown decreased in all women and was the most distinct in premenopausal women aged 35+. We found a significant increase in ER+ breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women whereas the incidence in premenopausal women (aged 35+) levelled off after 2002.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 29(7): 778-84, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15917857

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Waist circumference is directly related to all-cause mortality when adjusted for body mass index (BMI). Body fat and fat-free body mass, when mutually adjusted, show with increasing values an increasing and decreasing relation to all-cause mortality. We investigated the association of waist circumference and body composition (body fat and fat-free mass), mutually adjusted, to all-cause mortality. DESIGN: A Danish prospective cohort study with a median follow-up period of 5.8 y. SUBJECTS: In all, 27 178 men and 29 875 women, born in Denmark, aged 50-64 y, and without diagnosis of cancer at the time of invitation. MEASUREMENTS: Waist circumference and body composition estimated from impedance measurements. Cox's regression models were used to estimate the mortality rate ratios (RR). RESULTS: Waist circumference was strongly associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment for body composition; the mortality RR was 1.36 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.22-1.52) times higher per 10% larger waist circumference among men and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.17-1.44) times higher among women. Adjustment for waist circumference eliminated the association between high values of the body fat mass index (BFMI) and all-cause mortality. The association between fat-free mass index (FFMI) and mortality remained unaltered. CONCLUSION: Waist circumference accounted for the mortality risk associated with excess body fat and not fat-free mass. Waist circumference remained strongly and directly associated with all-cause mortality when adjusted for total body fat in middle-aged men and women, suggesting that the increased mortality risk related to excess body fat is mainly due to abdominal adiposity.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Body Constitution , Mortality , Abdomen , Anthropometry , Body Mass Index , Cause of Death , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors
3.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord ; 28(6): 741-7, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15052280

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether waist and hip circumferences, in addition to body mass index (BMI), are related to all-cause mortality. We studied these associations and tested the usefulness of the waist-to-hip ratio for mortality prediction. DESIGN: A Danish prospective cohort study with data collected between 1993 and 1997. SUBJECTS: A total of 27 179 men and 29 875 women born in Denmark and aged 50-64 years were followed for a median of 6.8 years. MEASUREMENTS: BMI, waist and hip circumferences at baseline. RESULTS: The associations between hip circumference and all-cause mortality were inverse for both men and women, but only after adjustment for waist circumference, or BMI, or both. The mortality rate ratios of mutually adjusted waist and hip circumferences were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.71), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.79) times higher per 10% larger hip circumference in men and women, respectively, and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.34, 1.57) and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.31) times higher per 10% larger waist circumference. The adequacy of the waist-to-hip ratio as a substitute for separate measurements of waist and hip circumferences depended on which other variables the analysis was adjusted for, indicating that the waist-to-hip ratio should be used with precaution. CONCLUSION: When mutually adjusted, waist and hip circumferences show opposite associations with all-cause mortality, probably due to different effects of adipose tissue in the abdominal and gluteofemoral regions. The waist-to-hip ratio cannot always capture these relations adequately.


Subject(s)
Body Constitution/physiology , Cause of Death , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Smoking/mortality
4.
Eur J Cancer ; 36(17): 2198-204, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11072204

ABSTRACT

Denmark is divided into 15 counties and it is up to regional politicians and the health authority in each county to organise the cervical screening programmes. The National Board of Health issued national guidelines and recommendations for the cervical cancer screening back in 1986, and these guidelines are now, in 1998, almost fully implemented. In this study, a literature review on cervical cancer screening in Denmark, review of local guidelines, personal interviews with pathologists and collection of information about the education of cytotechnologists in Denmark was carried out. In Denmark in 1997 90% of women aged 23-59 years and 46% of women aged 60-74 years were covered by organised screening. A total of 650000 smears were taken annually. This figure corresponds to screening of all Danish women aged 25-59 years on average, every second year. The national recommendation is screening every third year. Thus, as the incidence of cervical cancer in Denmark is decreasing, we could probably move towards a longer screening interval. However, before the Danish recommendations are changed, more detailed data on the actual performances of screening programmes are warranted.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/organization & administration , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Denmark/epidemiology , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Middle Aged , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaginal Smears/methods , Women's Health Services/standards , Women's Health Services/statistics & numerical data
5.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 162(16): 2324-9, 2000 Apr 17.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10827562

ABSTRACT

From 1990 through 1997 the working schedules for staff surgeons underwent gradual changes. The aim was to comply with patient demands to receive care from few surgeons during hospital care. To evaluate the effect, four controlled or cross sectional studies were conducted. Quality of care was assessed by surgical audit. Patient and surgeon satisfaction was examined with questionnaires and interviews. Changes in costs were evaluated by administrative data. The number of different specialists providing care was reduced by 50%, initially during inpatient care and later also during outpatient care. The patients experienced this change as very satisfying. Hospital stay was reduced, as was time used by specialists on out-of-hours duty. The quality of care did not change neither did the use of diagnostic tests. The specialists appraised the increased individual responsibility in patient care as satisfying. Initiatives should be taken to examine whether other ways of organising work for hospital employed doctors have similar effect.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Patient Satisfaction , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Surgery Department, Hospital/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Denmark , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Medical Audit , Surgery Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...