A decade of fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: Insights from a large real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ten years after its authorization, data about fingolimod use in real-world setting is still scarce. Here we describe the long-term evolution of fingolimod-treated relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients and determine baseline characteristics associated with risk of relapses or disability. METHODS: We analyzed baseline characteristics and clinical evolution of 1227 patients with RRMS treated with fingolimod from 2010 to 2019 in 4 French MS referral centers. We used Cox models to determine risks factors of relapses and sustained EDSS worsening. RESULTS: Median follow-up duration was 50 months, and 63% of patients remained fingolimod-treated at the end of follow-up. Mean 5-years annualized relapse rate (ARR) decreased from 0.63 (0.60-0.67) to 0.26 (0.24-0.29, P<0.001), while the mean EDSS rose from 2.5 (2.4-2.6) to 3.0 (2.8-3.1, P<0.001). Female sex, lower age, higher EDSS and use of natalizumab were associated with relapse risk. Female sex was associated with sustained EDSS increase risk. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a large real-world cohort, our results confirm the durable reduction of the ARR described in pivot studies. Switching from moderate-efficacy DMT to fingolimod decreased the relapse risk. Switching patients from high-efficacy DMT increased risk of relapse, but the overall five-years ARR remained stable.

Unravelling the etiology of sporadic late-onset cerebellar ataxia in a cohort of 205 patients: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent progress in the field of genetics, sporadic late-onset (> 40 years) cerebellar ataxia (SLOCA) etiology remains frequently elusive, while the optimal diagnostic workup still needs to be determined. We aimed to comprehensively describe the causes of SLOCA and to discuss the relevance of the investigations. METHODS: We included 205 consecutive patients with SLOCA seen in our referral center. Patients were prospectively investigated using exhaustive clinical assessment, biochemical, genetic, electrophysiological, and imaging explorations. RESULTS: We established a diagnosis in 135 (66%) patients and reported 26 different causes for SLOCA, the most frequent being multiple system atrophy cerebellar type (MSA-C) (41%). Fifty-one patients (25%) had various causes of SLOCA including immune-mediated diseases such as multiple sclerosis or anti-GAD antibody-mediated ataxia; and other causes, such as alcoholic cerebellar degeneration, superficial siderosis, or Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. We also identified 11 genetic causes in 20 patients, including SPG7 (n = 4), RFC1-associated CANVAS (n = 3), SLC20A2 (n = 3), very-late-onset Friedreich's ataxia (n = 2), FXTAS (n = 2), SCA3 (n = 1), SCA17 (n = 1), DRPLA (n = 1), MYORG (n = 1), MELAS (n = 1), and a mitochondriopathy (n = 1) that were less severe than MSA-C (p < 0.001). Remaining patients (34%) had idiopathic late-onset cerebellar ataxia which was less severe than MSA-C (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our prospective study provides an exhaustive picture of the etiology of SLOCA and clues regarding yield of investigations and diagnostic workup. Based on our observations, we established a diagnostic algorithm for SLOCA.

[Paraneoplastic ophthalmopathies]. / Ophtalmies paranéoplasiques.

Ocular paraneoplastic syndromes are rare conditions that can affect any part of the eye at any age. Thus, every ophthalmologist should be familiar with their management, as some of them may reveal severe, life-threatening conditions. These consist overwhelmingly of neuro-ophthalmological manifestations, affecting the optic nerve (paraneoplastic optic neuritis), retina (paraneoplastic retinopathy) or neurological pathways generating eye movements (saccadic intrusion, oculomotor palsy, nystagmus...); occasionally, they involve the anterior segment, orbit or uveal tract. As some of these manifestations appear to be quite common and non-specific, any systemic or especially neurologic comorbidities should increase suspicion. Treatment relies first on oncologic management, and then often more targeted therapy for the associated immune involvement.

Impact of disease-modifying treatments on humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination: A mirror of the response after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) according to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) and in comparison with the humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: We included 28 MS patients with serological results after COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna ARNm) and 61 MS patients with serological results after COVID-19 (COVID-19 group) among patients followed up at the MS Center of Strasbourg, France, between January and April 2021. The primary endpoint was the IgG index according to DMTs (anti-CD20 mAb, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor [S1PR] modulator and other treatments) and COVID-19 vaccine or COVID-19 groups. RESULTS: In the vaccinated MS patients, the median IgG index was lower in patients treated with anti-CD20 mAb and in patients treated with S1PR modulator compared to patients receiving other or no DMTs (4.80 [1.58-28.6], 16.5 [16.3-48.5], 1116 [434-1747] and 1272 [658-1886], respectively, P<0.001). Similar results were found for MS patients after COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MS and treated with S1PR modulators or anti-CD20 mAb had a reduced humoral response after COVID-19 vaccine.

Atypical myelitis in patients with multiple sclerosis: Characterization and comparison with typical multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

BACKGROUND: Atypical myelitis in multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by extensive myelitis in the longitudinal (longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis) or axial plane (transverse myelitis). OBJECTIVE: To characterize a cohort of MS patients with atypical myelitis. METHODS: Atypical myelitis was extracted from the French and Luxembourg MS databases and compared to two cohorts of MS patients with typical myelitis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) patients with myelitis. RESULTS: We enrolled 28 MS patients with atypical myelitis, 68 MS patients with typical myelitis and 119 NMOSD patients with a first episode of myelitis. MS patients with atypical myelitis were characterized by a mean age of 34.0 (±10.7) years and 64.3% were women. In 82.1% of the patients, atypical myelitis was the first episode of MS. Mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores at nadir and 3-6 months after onset were 4.1 ± 2.1 and 3.3 ± 2, respectively. Differences between groups revealed a predominance of cervicothoracic myelitis and a higher level of disability in NMOSD patients. Disability in MS patients with atypical myelitis was more severe than in the MS patients with typical myelitis; 28% had already converted to progressive MS within our mean follow-up of 39.6 (±30.4) months. CONCLUSION: Atypical myelitis may be the first presentation of MS and is associated with poorer prognosis.

Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes.

During the 20 past years, the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) has largely changed especially concerning therapeutical approach. Before 1996, treatments were restricted to corticosteroids for relapses, several symptomatic treatments and unselective immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate) with a low evidence of any efficacy. In the present review, we analyze the principal real-life cohorts of MS during several periods (before therapeutical modern area, first-generation treatment area and most recent period). Despite many methodological problems, we observe globally a delay of around 3-5 years between untreated cohorts and first-generation treatments for going to EDSS 6 which is probably the most robust score. This delay is clearly increase to at least 15 years with the most recent cohort treated first and second-line treatments confirming that early and more intensive treatment are necessary to have a long-term efficacy on disability progression and especially on severe disability represent by EDSS 6. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these tendencies and OFSEP observatory or MS base will probably provide us the possibility to conclude in a couple of years.