ABSTRACT
The team approach has enjoyed great success in the care of patients with burns, and it has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in these cases. Although the concept of the team approach is well-defined, the delineation of roles within this approach remains unclear. This study was designed to better explain the roles of physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) in burn care. With the use of a questionnaire, PT and OT responsibilities were reviewed. The results showed that OTs perform the majority of activities of daily living training, PTs perform the majority of functional mobility training, both professions are involved in scar management, and neither profession has significant responsibility for care of the burn wound itself. Role delineation occurs to help avoid role confusion and the duplication of services. The title burn therapist offers an example of unclear role definition when a physical therapy assistant uses that title to identify himself or herself. Communication is critical to define these roles within individual burn centers.
Subject(s)
Burns/rehabilitation , Occupational Therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Activities of Daily Living , Data Collection , Humans , Job Description , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , RoleABSTRACT
Since 1982, there have been summer camps for children and adolescent burn survivors. Although the primary focus of camp is to have "fun," the principal goal is psychosocial readjustment through peer interactions and the resulting enhancement of self-esteem (SE). This study was initiated to test the hypothesis that the burn camp experience enhances the SE of campers. Forty-three campers at the Connecticut Burns Care Foundation Summer Camp were invited to participate in this study with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The age range was 8 to 18 years (mean 12 years). The extent of previous burn injury ranged from 10% to 98% total body surface area (mean 40%). The interval between hospital discharge and camp experience was 4 to 144 months (mean 54 months). Thirty-seven percent of the children demonstrated an increase in SE to varying degrees, whereas 30% showed no change, and 3% exhibited a decrease in SE. This study failed to support the working hypothesis.
