Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Visc Surg ; 154 Suppl 1: S19-S29, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29055663

ABSTRACT

The concept of damage control (DC) is based on a sequential therapeutic strategy that favors physiological restoration over anatomical repair in patients presenting acutely with hemorrhagic trauma. Initially described as damage control surgery (DCS) for war-wounded patients with abdominal penetrating hemorrhagic trauma, this concept is articulated in three steps: surgical control of lesions (hemostasis, sealing of intestinal spillage), physiological restoration, then surgery for definitive repair. This concept was quickly adapted for intensive care management under the name damage control resuscitation (DCR), which refers to the modalities of hospital resuscitation carried out in patients suffering from traumatic hemorrhagic shock within the context of DCS. It is based mainly on specific hemodynamic resuscitation targets associated with early and aggressive hemostasis aimed at prevention or correction of the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulation disorders. Concomitant integration of resuscitation and surgery from the moment of admission has led to the concept of an integrated DCR-DCS approach, which enables initiation of hemostatic resuscitation upon arrival of the injured person, improving the patient's physiological status during surgery without delaying surgery. This concept of DC is constantly evolving; it stresses management of the injured person as early as possible, in order to initiate hemorrhage control and hemostatic resuscitation as soon as possible, evolving into a concept of remote DCR (RDCR), and also extended to diagnostic and therapeutic radiological management under the name of radiological DC (DCRad). DCS is applied only to the most seriously traumatized patients, or in situations of massive influx of injured persons, as its universal application could lead to a significant and unnecessary excess-morbidity to injured patients who could and should undergo definitive treatment from the outset. DCS, when correctly applied, significantly improves the survival rate of war-wounded.


Subject(s)
Hemostatic Techniques , Resuscitation/methods , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Shock, Traumatic/therapy , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Fluid Therapy/methods , Humans
2.
Resuscitation ; 85(12): 1720-5, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25281907

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases the likelihood of survival and thus is highly recommended. However, the detection rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is very different from one system to another, and early recognition of cardiac arrest in the dispatch centre remains challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the provision of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the main French dispatch centre. METHODS: In the Paris Fire Brigade, each patient over 15 years of age who presented an OHCA from 15 to 31 May 2012 was prospectively included. Field data and tape recordings of emergency calls were studied by three experienced physicians, to assess the rate (and delay) of OHCA recognition and chest compression initiation, and identify the causes of unrecognized OHCA. RESULTS: Among 82 consecutive calls for detectable cardiac arrest, the dispatcher recognized 50/82 (61%). The median times from call to OHCA recognition and from call to chest compression initiation were, respectively, 2 min 23s (1 min 51 s to 3 min 7s) and 3 min 37s (2 min 57 s to 5 min). The main causes of non-recognition of OHCA were the absence or incomplete assessment of breathing and the presence of agonal breathing. No cardiac arrest was missed when the dispatcher followed the local dispatch algorithm; this included the gesture of putting the hand on the abdomen and measuring the breathing frequency. Hospital admission with a beating heart was paradoxically 18% for detected cardiac arrest and 47% for undetected cardiac arrest (p=0.007). This paradox could be explained by the relation between agonal breathing and, on the one hand, good prognosis of OHCA and, on the other hand, difficulties in recognizing OHCA. CONCLUSION: The improvement of cardiac arrest recognition in the dispatch centre seemed mandatory, as the cardiac arrests of better immediate prognosis were not well detected. The measurement of OHCA recognition and CPR initiation by phone should be encouraged in dispatch centres as a key to initiating corrective measures.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Early Diagnosis , Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems/organization & administration , Heart Massage/methods , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/diagnosis , Tape Recording/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Paris/epidemiology , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...