Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Conserv Biol ; 28(5): 1360-70, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24684650

ABSTRACT

Because both descriptions of species and modern human-driven extinctions started around the same time (i.e., eighteenth century), a logical expectation is that a large proportion of species may have gone extinct without ever having been recorded. Despite this evident and widely recognized assumption, the loss of undescribed species has never been estimated. We quantified this loss for several taxonomic groups and regions for which undescribed species extinctions are likely to have occurred. Across a wide range of taxonomic groups, we applied known extinction rates computed from recorded species losses to assumed exponential decay in the proportion of species remaining undiscovered. Because all previous modeling attempts to project total species richness implicitly assumed that undescribed species extinctions could be neglected, we also evaluated the effect of neglecting them. Finally, because we assumed constant description and extinction probabilities, we applied our model to simulated data that did not conform to this assumption. Actual species losses were severely underestimated by considering only known species extinctions. According to our estimates, the proportion of undiscovered extinct species over all extinctions ranged from 0.15 to 0.59, depending on the taxonomic group and the region considered. This means that recent extinctions may be up to twice as large as the number recorded. When species differed in their extinction or description probabilities, our model underestimated extinctions of undescribed species by up to 20%.


Subject(s)
Biodiversity , Conservation of Natural Resources , Extinction, Biological , Animals , Models, Biological , Plants
2.
Mol Phylogenet Evol ; 14(1): 1-10, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10631038

ABSTRACT

The Mormyridae are African osteoglossomorph freshwater fishes of great interest because of their electric organs. They have become an important model in studies of electrophysiology and behavior but their phylogenetic relationships are poorly known. Phylogenetic relationships among mormyrids were determined by comparing cytochrome b sequences (588 bp) of 27 species belonging to 15 genera. Results showed that the Petrocephalus species (subfamily Petrocephalinae) are the sister-group of all other mormyrids (subfamily Mormyrinae). The monophyly of the Mormyrinae was supported, as well as three original intra-Mormyrinae clades. Three genera, Marcusenius, Pollimyrus, and Brienomyrus, were found to be polyphyletic with high support. Some of these polyphylies are tentatively explained. The results confirmed that the lateral ethmoid bone was lost several times within the Mormyrinae. These findings emphasize the necessity of systematic studies and taxonomic revision of the Mormyridae. The tree obtained from the mitochondrial data showed a single rise of each electrocyte type except for electrocyte with penetrating stalk ("Pa"). Constraining the single occurrence of electrocyte type Pa did not require an excessive number of extra steps (1.86%).


Subject(s)
Cytochrome b Group/genetics , Electric Fish/genetics , Phylogeny , Animals , Computer Simulation , DNA Mutational Analysis , Electric Fish/classification , Electric Organ/physiology , Ethmoid Bone/physiology , Linear Models
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...