Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Nurs Manag ; 28(3): 586-594, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31958196

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study describes the impact of a university-based mentorship programme that is designed to prepare nursing students for the transition to practice during their last year of classes. BACKGROUND: Research shows that mentorship is an effective strategy for facilitating the transition to clinical practice. However, there is a lack of programmes that provide mentorship prior to the students' graduation from nursing school. METHODS: A mixed qualitative and quantitative approach was chosen to describe nursing students' perceptions. Mentees and mentors were invited to complete a survey or participate in an interview (September-November 2018). RESULTS: Nine participants were interviewed and 22 completed the survey. Four themes were found. Students were as follows: Feeling unsure and looking for answers from clinicians and wanted to Learn about practical real-life situations. Their experiences allowed them to Normalize the entry to practice and become more prepared and capable to address pragmatic issues. CONCLUSIONS: By bridging the academic and clinical environments, this mentorship programme helped mentees address their concerns and facilitated an easier transition to the workplace after graduation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers can advocate for mentorship programmes by partnering with educational institutions. This support can also be continued as new graduates transition into their careers.


Subject(s)
Mentoring/methods , Students, Nursing/psychology , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/methods , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Mentoring/trends , Program Development/methods , Qualitative Research , Students, Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities/organization & administration , Universities/statistics & numerical data
2.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol ; 15(1): 76-91, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30729829

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Wheelchairs and scooters promote participation and have positive effects on quality of life. However, powered wheelchairs (PW) use can be challenging and can pose safety concerns. Adequate PW assessment and training is important. There is a wide variety of tasks and PW driving assessment measures used for training and assessing PW driving ability in the literature and little consensus as to which tasks and outcomes are the most relevant. A scoping review of the literature was performed in order to characterize this extensive variety of tasks and performance-based outcomes used for training and assessing PW skills.Methods: A search of the literature was conducted in January 2017. Four databases were searched: CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo and Medline. Articles were included if they contained at least one PW driving task.Results: 827 articles were screened and 48 articles were retained. PW driving tasks from each article were identified and categorized in terms of the environment in which they were performed: Driving in a controlled environment, ecological driving tasks, 2D virtual environment (VE) tasks, 3D VE tasks. The assessment measures formed a separate category. Subjective and objective performance-based outcomes related to PW driving were also identified and grouped into outcomes assessing speed and outcomes assessing accuracy.Conclusion: This scoping review provides an overview of tasks and performance outcomes used in the literature when training and assessing PW skills. The results of this review could guide future research when choosing appropriate tasks and performance outcomes for PW driving ability.Implications for rehabilitationThere is wide variety of tasks and performance-based outcomes for PW driving.Results showed that available assessment measures are not commonly used in research and that tasks used often lacked consistency across studies.New methods to measure the interaction of speed and accuracy are needed.The contents of this review could be used by researchers as a starting point when designing a PW task and selecting appropriate performance-based outcomes.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Task Performance and Analysis , Wheelchairs , Electric Power Supplies , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality of Life , User-Computer Interface
3.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 16(1): 12, 2019 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30658668

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Powered wheelchair (PW) driving is a complex activity and requires the acquisition of several skills. Given the risks involved with PW use, safe and effective training methods are needed. Virtual reality training allows users to practice difficult tasks in a safe environment. An additional benefit is that augmented feedback can be provided to optimize learning. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether providing augmented feedback during powered wheelchair simulator training results in superior performance, and whether skills learned in a virtual environment transfer to real PW driving. METHODS: Forty healthy young adults were randomly allocated to two groups: one received augmented feedback during simulator training while the control group received no augmented feedback. PW driving performance was assessed at baseline in both the real and virtual environment (RE and VE), after training in VE and two days later in VE and RE (retention and transfer tests). RESULTS: Both groups showed significantly better task completion time and number of collisions in the VE after training and these results were maintained two days later. The transfer test indicated better performance in the RE compared to baseline for both groups. Because time and collisions interact, a post-hoc 2D Kolmogonov-Smirnov test was used to investigate the differences in the speed-accuracy distributions for each group; a significant difference was found for the group receiving augmented feedback, before and after training, whereas the difference was not significant for the control group. There were no differences at the retention test, suggesting that augmented feedback was most effective during and immediately after training. CONCLUSIONS: PW simulator training is effective in improving task completion time and number of collisions. A small effect of augmented feedback was seen when looking at differences in the speed-accuracy distributions, highlighting the importance of accounting for the speed-accuracy tradeoff for PW driving.


Subject(s)
Simulation Training/methods , Virtual Reality , Wheelchairs , Computer Simulation , Feedback , Female , Humans , Male , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , User-Computer Interface , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...