Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 159: A8475, 2015.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25827148

ABSTRACT

After the publication of the Dutch medical guideline on pharmacological analgesia during childbirth in 2008, the question of whether pharmacological pain relief should be permissible during labour was hotly debated. This discussion has been going on since the second half of the 19th century when the introduction of ether and chloroform was extensively studied and described in Great Britain. This article looks back on the same debate in the Netherlands when inhalational anaesthetics were introduced into obstetrics. Study of historical journals and textbooks, originating in the Netherlands and elsewhere, and of historical medical literature on anaesthesia and obstetrics shows that the Dutch protagonists adopted more nuanced ideas on this issue than many of their foreign colleagues. This description of the first Dutch debate on anaesthesia in obstetrics shows that in fact the issues and arguments are timeless.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Obstetrical/history , Labor, Obstetric/drug effects , Obstetrics/history , Anesthesia, Inhalation , Anesthesiology , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Netherlands , Pain/physiopathology , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...