Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478055

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Low-energy fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are an underestimated entity, yet increasing in incidence. The bleeding risk for pelvic fractures in high-energy trauma is well known, resulting in adequate treatment guidelines and clear protocols. This is not the case for FFPs but this risk is presumably low. This study aims to investigate the clinically relevant bleeding risk, in patients older than 50 years with a fragility fracture of the pelvis admitted to the emergency department (ED). METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of consecutive patients aged over 50 years with a FFP due to low-energy trauma (LET) presented to the ED of a single trauma center (North-West Clinics in Alkmaar, The Netherlands) between January 2018 and August 2022. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients requiring blood transfusion, or invasive procedures such as coiling by the interventional radiologists or damage control surgery, due to bleeding. Secondary outcomes were the mean decrease of hemoglobin and mortality. RESULTS: In total, 322 consecutive patients with a mean age of 80 years of which 84% female were included. In total 66% was admitted to the hospital and seven patients underwent surgical intervention. Three cases (0.9%) of potentially clinically relevant bleeding were observed. These three cases needed a blood transfusion, without other interventions, and were all admitted with a low hemoglobin level without signs of hemodynamic instability. No invasive interventions were noted. CONCLUSION: The risk of bleeding in FFP's is very low with very few patients requiring blood transfusions (< 1%) and with no invasive interventions due to bleeding. Since the risk of clinically relevant bleeding is low, the significance of repeated Hb checks and CECT may be questionable. The effect of these diagnostics in case of absence of hemodynamic instability and above borderline normal Hb levels needs to be investigated in further studies.

2.
Children (Basel) ; 10(12)2023 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38136114

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the annual, seasonal and monthly trends in children with simple and complex appendicitis and their correlation to common viral pathogens in the Netherlands. A consecutive multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed between 2010 and 2019 including children (<18 years) surgically treated for appendicitis. The primary outcome was the distribution of children with simple and complex appendicitis per year, season and month. Relevant seasonal variation was defined as ≥5%. The secondary outcome was a positive correlation of the number of patients with simple and complex appendicitis to common viral pathogens (data anonymously provided by the Dutch Working Group on Clinical Virology from the Dutch Society for Clinical Microbiology (NVMM)). In total, 896 patients were included: N = 524 (58%) patients with simple and N = 372 (42%) with complex appendicitis. Of the children aged 0-5 years, 81% had complex appendicitis, versus 38% in 6-18 years (p < 0.001). An overall decline was demonstrated for both simple and complex appendicitis between 2010 and 2019. No seasonal variation was found for simple appendicitis. For complex appendicitis, the highest number of patients was found in spring, and lowest in summer (N = 372, spring 28.2 ± 5.1% versus summer 21.0 ± 5.8%, p = 0.011), but the variance was regarded as not relevant (<5% from baseline). A positive correlation was found between complex appendicitis with Adenovirus 40.41 (R = 0.356, 95%CI 0.045-0.604, p = 0.026) and simple appendicitis with Adenovirus NON 40.41 (R = 0.332, 95%CI 0.019-0.586, p = 0.039), but these correlations did not remain significant after a Bonferroni correction (p < 0.003). In conclusion, we found no relevant seasonal variation for simple or complex appendicitis, nor positive correlation with common viral pathogens.

3.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 908485, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35799699

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that specific cases of post-appendectomy abscess (PAA) in children could be treated conservatively. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, choice of treatment still depends on preferences of the treating surgeon, leading to heterogeneity in clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to provide an update of recent literature on the management of PAA in children and subsequently evaluate the outcomes of a large multicenter cohort of children treated for PAA. Methods: A literature search was performed in Pubmed and Embase, selecting all randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case series published from 2014 and onward and reporting on children (<18 years) treated for a PAA. Subsequently, a historical cohort study was performed, including all children (<18 years) treated for a radiologically confirmed PAA between 2014 and 2021 in a tertiary referral center and two large peripheral centers. Medical charts were reviewed to compare non-invasive (i.e., antibiotics) and invasive (i.e., drainage procedures) treatment strategies. Primary outcome was the success rate of treatment, defined as no need for further interventions related to PAA or its complications. Results: The search yielded 1,991 articles, of which three were included. Treatment success ranged between 69-88% and 56-100% for non-invasive and invasive strategies, respectively. Our multicenter cohort study included 70 children with a PAA, of which 29 (41%) were treated non-invasively and 41 (59%) invasively. In the non-invasive group, treatment was effective in 21 patients (72%) compared to 25 patients (61%) in the invasive group. Non-invasive treatment was effective in 100% of unifocal small (<3 cm) and 80% of unifocal medium size PAA (3-6 cm), but not effective for multiple abscesses. Conclusion: Non-invasive treatment of especially unifocal small and medium size (<6 cm) PAA in children seems to be safe and effective. Based on these results, a standardized treatment protocol was developed. Prospective validation of this step-up approach-based treatment protocol is recommended.

4.
Surgery ; 171(5): 1150-1157, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35067338

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several clinical prediction rules have been developed for preoperative differentiation between simple and complex appendicitis in children, as potential treatment strategies differ. This study aimed to externally validate applicable clinical prediction rules that could be used to differentiate between simple and complex appendicitis in children. METHODS: Potential clinical prediction rules were identified by a scoping review of the literature. Clinical prediction rules applicable in our daily practice were subsequently externally validated in a multicenter historical cohort consisting of 1 tertiary center and 1 large teaching hospital. All children (<18 years old) with histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis between 2013 and 2020 were included. Test results of clinical prediction rules were compared to the gold standard of either simple or complex appendicitis consisting of predefined perioperative and histopathological criteria. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were determined for the selected clinical prediction rules. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.7 were considered acceptable and potentially useful. RESULTS: In total, 31 clinical prediction rules were identified, of which 12 could be evaluated in our cohort consisting of 550 children. The main reason to exclude clinical prediction rules was the use of variables that were not routinely measured in our cohort. In our cohort, 208/550 (38%) were diagnosed with complex appendicitis according to the gold standard. Clinical prediction rules with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.7 were: Gorter (0.81), Bogaard (0.79), Bröker (0.79), Graham (0.77), Hansson (0.76), BADCF (0.76), and Eddama (0.75). CONCLUSION: In this study, clinical prediction rules consisting of a combination of clinical and objective variables had the highest discriminative ability. External validation showed that 7 clinical prediction rules were potentially useful. Integration of these clinical prediction rules in daily practice is proposed to guide decision making regarding treatment strategies.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Appendicitis/pathology , Appendicitis/surgery , Child , Clinical Decision Rules , Humans , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies
5.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 15: 24, 2014 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24443982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Up to 30% of patients suffer from long-term functional restrictions following conservative treatment of distal radius fractures. Whether duration of cast immobilisation influences functional outcome remains unclear. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether the duration of immobilization of non or minimally displaced distal radial fractures can be safely reduced. We will compare three weeks of plaster cast immobilization with five weeks of plaster cast immobilization in adult patient with non or minimally displaced distal radial fractures. STUDY DESIGN: a prospective randomized clinical trial. STUDY POPULATION: adult (>18 years) (independent in activities of daily living) patients with a non/minimal displaced distal radius fracture (dorsal angulation <15°, volar tilt <20°, radial inclination >15°, ulnar positive variance <5 mm and an articular step off <2 mm). INTERVENTION: three weeks of plaster cast immobilization versus five weeks of plaster cast immobilization.Main study parameters: primary outcome parameters: Patient related wrist evaluation (PRWE) Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QUICKDASH) score after a one year follow-up, and secondary parameters: range of motion, pain level (VAS) and complications. DISCUSSION: The expectation of this study is that shorter duration of plaster cast immobilisation is beneficial for the patient with a distal radius fracture. This risk of specific complications is low and generally similar in both treatment options. Moreover, the burden of the study is not much higher compared to standard treatment. Follow-up is standardized according to current trauma guidelines. Literature indicates that both treatment options from the study are accepted for displaced distal radius fractures. No clear advantage for one treatment options is found at present in the literature, although there is no level I evidence present. This trial will provide level-1 evidence for the comparison of consolidation and functional outcome between two treatment options for non-displaced distal radial fractures. The gathered data may support the development of a clinical guideline for conservative treatment of distal radial fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3552.


Subject(s)
Casts, Surgical , Immobilization/methods , Radius Fractures/therapy , Research Design , Activities of Daily Living , Clinical Protocols , Female , Fracture Healing , Humans , Immobilization/adverse effects , Male , Netherlands , Prospective Studies , Radius Fractures/diagnosis , Radius Fractures/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 21(5): 349-53, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24300247

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: After shoulder trauma, most fractures and dislocations are easily recognized on radiographic examination; however, the opposite is true for rotator cuff injuries. As a consequence, shoulder complaints may persist or arise due to unrecognized cuff injury. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of shoulder pain and symptomatic rotator cuff ruptures 1 year after shoulder trauma without fracture or dislocation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective descriptive study included all the patients presented at our emergency department between January 2007 and January 2008 after a trauma to the shoulder without fracture or dislocation. One year after trauma, this cohort was interviewed by telephone and re-examined at the outpatient clinic on indication. RESULTS: Of the 217 patients included, all had been pain-free before the trauma. One year after trauma, 69 patients (32%) were still suffering from shoulder pain. Of these patients, 31 were re-examined and 27 had already been re-examined in the meantime. In total, 20 of these 58 patients (34%) were diagnosed with a symptomatic rotator cuff rupture, representing a prevalence of 9% among the included patients. CONCLUSION: Emergency physicians should be aware that normal radiography does not exclude the presence of a rotator cuff tear in patients with a history of shoulder trauma. Regular follow-up is essential for discovering rotator cuff injuries. In this study, 32% still suffered from shoulder pain 1 year after shoulder trauma, and re-examination revealed a prevalence of 9% symptomatic rotator cuff ruptures.


Subject(s)
Rotator Cuff Injuries , Rupture/epidemiology , Shoulder Injuries , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Memory, Episodic , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Rupture/etiology , Shoulder Pain/epidemiology , Shoulder Pain/etiology , Young Adult
7.
Injury ; 44(11): 1574-8, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23725871

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Difficulties have been reported in the patient distribution during Mass Casualty Incidents. In this study we analysed the regional patient distribution protocol (PDP) and the actual patient distribution after the 2009 Turkish Airlines crash near Amsterdam. METHODS: Analysis of the patient distribution of 126 surviving casualties of the crash by collecting data on medical treatment capacity, number of patients received per hospital, triage classification, Injury Severity Score (ISS), secondary transfers, distance from the crash site, and the critical mortality rate. RESULTS: The PDP holds ambiguous definitions of medical treatment capacity and was not followed. There were 14 receiving hospitals (distance from crash: 5.8-53.5 km); four hospitals received 133-213% of their treatment capacity, and 5 hospitals received 1 patient. Three hospitals within 20 km of the crash did not receive any casualties. Level I trauma centres received 89% of the 'critical' casualties and 92% of the casualties with ISS ≥ 16. Only 3 casualties were secondarily transferred, and no casualties died in, or on the way to hospital (critical mortality rate=0%). CONCLUSION: Patient distribution worked out well after the crash as secondary transfers were low and critical mortality rate was zero. However, the regional PDP was not followed in this MCI and casualties were unevenly distributed among hospitals. The PDP is indistinctive, and should be updated in cooperation between Emergency Services, surrounding hospitals, and Schiphol International Airport as a high risk area.


Subject(s)
Aircraft , Disaster Planning , Disasters , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital , Triage/organization & administration , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Ambulances , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Mass Casualty Incidents , Netherlands , Patient Transfer/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies , Triage/standards , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
8.
Injury ; 44(8): 1061-7, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23683832

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Triage is an important aspect of the management of mass casualty incidents. This study describes the triage after the Turkish Airlines Crash near Amsterdam in 2009. The results of the triage and the injuries of P3 casualties were evaluated. In addition, the role of the trauma mechanism and its effect on spinal immobilisation during transport was analysed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of investigational reports, ambulance forms, and medical charts of survivors of the crash. Outcomes were triage classification, type of injury, AIS, ISS, emergency interventions and the spinal immobilisation during transport. RESULTS: A minimal documentation of prehospital triage was found, and no exact numbers could be recollected. During inhospital triage 28% was triaged as P1, 10% had an ISS ≥ 16 and 3% met the modified Baxt criteria for emergency intervention. 40% was triaged P3, 72% had an ISS ≤ 8 and 63% was discharged from the Emergency Department after evaluation. In hospital over-triage was up to 89%. Critical mortality rate was 0%. Nine per cent of P3 casualties and 17% of 'walking' casualties had serious injuries. Twenty-two per cent of all casualties was transported with spinal immobilisation. Of the casualties diagnosed with spinal injury 22% was not transported with spinal immobilisation. CONCLUSION: After the Turkish Airlines Crash documentation of prehospital triage was minimal. According to the Baxt criteria the overtriage was high. Injuries sustained by plane crash survivors that seem minimally harmed must not be underestimated. Considering the high energy trauma mechanism, too little consideration was given to spinal immobilisation during transport.


Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Triage/organization & administration , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Aircraft , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immobilization/methods , Immobilization/standards , Injury Severity Score , Mass Casualty Incidents , Netherlands/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Triage/standards , Wounds and Injuries/mortality
9.
Insights Imaging ; 3(5): 513-7, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22733622

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Acute wrist trauma in children is one of the most frequent reasons for visiting the emergency department (ED). Radiographic imaging in children with wrist trauma is mostly performed routinely to confirm or rule out a fracture. The aim of this study was to determine how many radiographs of the wrist show a fracture in children following wrist trauma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in three Dutch hospitals from 2009-2010. Data were extracted from patient records and radiographic reports. RESULTS: Of the 1,223 children who presented at the ED after a wrist trauma, 51 % had a wrist fracture. The peak incidence of having a wrist fracture was at the age of 10 years; 65 % of the children younger than 10 years of age had a wrist fracture. Of all the patients without a wrist fracture, 74 % were older than 10 years of age. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the paediatric patients with a trauma of the wrist had normal radiographs. The development of a clinical decision rule to determine when a radiograph of the wrist is indicated following acute wrist trauma is needed. This could likely reduce the number of radiographs. MAIN MESSAGES: • Fifty-one percent of the children with wrist trauma have a wrist fracture. • Peak incidence of having a wrist fracture is at the age of 10 years. • Sixty-five percent of the children younger than 10 years of age had a wrist fracture. • Of all the patients without a wrist fracture, 74 % were older than 10 years of age. • The development of a clinical decision rule to reduce the number of radiographs is needed.

10.
Prehosp Disaster Med ; 26(4): 299-304, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22030080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the injuries and distribution of casualties resulting from the crash of Turkish Airlines flight TK 1951 near Schiphol Airport in the Netherlands on 25 of February 2009. METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive study. Based on a review of the hospital records for all casualties of the airplane crash, triage at the scene, time to emergency department, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS), mortality, length of hospital stay and surgical procedures were abstracted. RESULTS: Of the 135 passengers, nine died on-scene. A total of 126 survivors were examined in 15 hospitals; data for all survivors were available for the study. Median time between crash and arrival at an emergency department was 3.5 hours (range 1.25-5.5 hours). Six passengers were uninjured and 66 were admitted to hospital. A total of 305 injuries were recorded. The majority were head and facial injuries (92), spinal injuries (35), and fractures of extremities (38). Eighteen percent of the patients had a spinal injury. The mean ISS was 6.3 (range = 1-57). The ISS score was >15 for 13 patients. Surgical procedures (80) were necessary in 23 patients. There was no in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Although the accident was in an urban area, there was a significant delay between the time of the accident and the arrival of the casualties at hospital emergency departments. The Turkish Airlines crash provides extensive information for research into mass-casualty or disaster management, triage, plane crash injuries, and survivability. The "Medical Research Turkish Airlines Crash" (MOTAC) study group currently is investigating several of these issues.


Subject(s)
Airports , Injury Severity Score , Aircraft , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Triage , Wounds and Injuries
11.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 12: 238, 2011 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22004344

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute trauma of the wrist is one of the most frequent reasons for visiting the Emergency Department. These patients are routinely referred for radiological examination. Most X-rays however, do not reveal any fractures. A clinical decision rule determining the need for X-rays in patients with acute wrist trauma may help to percolate and select patients with fractures. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will be a multi-center observational diagnostic study in which the data will be collected cross-sectionally. The study population will consist of all consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) presenting with acute wrist trauma at the Emergency Department in the participating hospitals. This research comprises two components: one study will be conducted to determine which clinical parameters are predictive for the presence of a distal radius fracture in adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department following acute wrist trauma. These clinical parameters are defined by trauma-mechanism, physical examination, and functional testing. This data will be collected in two of the three participating hospitals and will be assessed by using logistic regression modelling to estimate the regression coefficients after which a reduced model will be created by means of a log likelihood ratio test. The accuracy of the model will be estimated by a goodness of fit test and an ROC curve. The final model will be validated internally through bootstrapping and by shrinking it, an adjusted model will be generated. In the second component of this study, the developed prediction model will be validated in a new dataset consisting of a population of patients from the third hospital. If necessary, the model will be calibrated using the data from the validation study. DISCUSSION: Wrist trauma is frequently encountered at the Emergency Department. However, to this date, no decision rule regarding this type of trauma has been created. Ideally, radiographs are obtained of all patients entering one of the participating hospitals with trauma to the wrist. However, this is ethically and logistically not feasible and one could argue that patients, for whom no radiography is required according to their physician, are not suspected of having a distal radius fracture and thus are not part of the domain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR 2544) and was granted permission by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam on 06-01-2011.


Subject(s)
Arthrography/standards , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Research Design/standards , Wrist Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Injuries/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Netherlands , Patient Selection , Wrist Injuries/physiopathology
12.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 154: A1064, 2010.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20132571

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the injuries and distribution of casualties resulting from the crash of Turkish Airlines flight TK 1951 near Schiphol Airport on 25 February 2009. DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive. METHOD: We reviewed the hospital case notes of all casualties of the airplane crash and scored triage at the scene, time to emergency department, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS), mortality, length of hospital stay and surgical procedures. RESULTS: Of the 135 passengers, 9 died on the scene. A total of 126 survivors were examined in 15 hospitals; data from 125 were available for our research. Median time between crash and arrival at an Emergency Department was 3.5 hours (range 1.25-5.5 h). Six passengers were uninjured and 64 were admitted to hospital. A total of 297 injuries were registered. Most injuries were to the head and face (81), spinal injuries (31) and fractures of extremities (34). In the study group 17% of the patients had a spinal fracture. The mean ISS was 6.5 (range 1-57). In 12 patients the ISS was >or= 16. Surgical procedures (80) were necessary in 23 patients. There was no in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Of the 135 passengers, 9 died and 120 were injured. Although the accident was in an urban area, there was a significant delay between the accident and the arrival of the casualties at Emergency Departments. Most of the injuries were to the head and face, and to the spine and extremities.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Aviation , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Quality of Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Facial Injuries/epidemiology , Facial Injuries/mortality , Female , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/mortality , Hand Injuries/epidemiology , Hand Injuries/mortality , Humans , Infant , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Injuries/epidemiology , Spinal Injuries/mortality , Time Factors , Young Adult
15.
J Trauma ; 63(4): 908-13, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18090025

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the base deficit is available as an objective indicator of acid base status. We used the base deficit as a measure of physiologic derangement in a Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS)-like model as a predictor for outcome in trauma patients. METHODS: We prospectively recorded data of 349 consecutive trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit and calculated Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score and Abbreviated Injury Scale, and TRISS and correlated them with the simultaneously determined base deficit value. The delta base deficit is introduced, which is the absolute difference of the base deficit from its normal range (-2 to 2). A statistical model analogous to the TRISS model was designed in which the physiologic disturbance reflected by the Revised Trauma Score was replaced by the delta base deficit [Base Excess Injury Severity Scale (BISS) model]. Calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curve compared these two models. Finally, the BISS model was validated in a patient group from another tertiary referral hospital in which similar data were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: We demonstrated a significant correlation between the delta base deficit and the calculated trauma scoring systems. Moreover, the delta base deficit is significantly correlated with mortality. The BISS performed better than the TRISS did when evaluated by the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC 0.806 vs. 0.803, respectively). Validation in an independent prospectively compiled dataset from another referral center showed comparable and even better results (AUC 0.891 vs. 0.885, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of our proposed BISS model was superior to that of the TRISS model in the populations under investigation. Nevertheless, given the ease of assessment and the objective value of the base deficit, it may be considered as a good method to predict outcome and evaluate care of trauma patients. Whether this can be translated to trauma patients in general needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Abbreviated Injury Scale , Adult , Cause of Death , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Logistic Models , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...