Dose-specific clinical outcomes in patients with opioid use disorder treated with 24-32 mg/day of buprenorphine.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In people with opioid use disorder (OUD), buprenorphine is a vital treatment to decrease opioid use and overdose. The US Food and Drug Administration's prescribing information for buprenorphine advises dosing up to 24 mg/day; however, doses of buprenorphine up to 32 mg have been shown to be safe and effective. We compared outcomes associated increased dosing from 24 to 32 mg/day. DESIGN: Prospective cohort investigation. SETTING: Low-barrier buprenorphine clinic in Washington, District of Columbia, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the ANCHOR study (people with hepatitis C virus (HCV), OUD, and active opioid misuse who were treated for HCV and offered buprenorphine) who received buprenorphine at doses of 24 and/or 32 mg/day. 72 participants were included in the analysis: 24 (33%) patients stabilized on 24 mg, and 48 (67%) patients stabilized on 32 mg. Patients were predominantly male (78%), Black (96%), unstably housed (57%), and used opioids by injection (93%). MEASUREMENTS: Patient-reported drug use, use frequency, triggers for use, and urine drug screens were collected at each visit. For analysis, the cohort was divided into individuals stabilized on 24 mg (24 mg cohort) or 32 mg (32 mg cohort). Drug use outcomes were assessed between cohorts at 24 mg dosing and at respective maximum dosing. Within the 32 mg cohort, outcomes were compared at 24 mg versus 32 mg dosing. FINDINGS: Within the 32 mg cohort, increased dosing from 24 to 32 mg was associated with a decline in opioid use (68.5% [5.2%] at 24 mg vs 59.5% [5.6%] at 32 mg; P = 0.02), frequency of use per week (1.58 [0.19] at 24 mg vs. 1.15 [0.16] at 32 mg; P = 0.0002) and physiologic triggers for use (38.2% [6.0%] at 24 mg vs 7.0% [1.9%] at 32 mg; P < 0.0001). At the end of the study period, there were significantly more patients retained in the 32 mg cohort (78.7%) compared with the 24 mg cohort (50.0%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Higher buprenorphine dosing (32 mg/day) appears to improve outcomes in people with opioid use disorder, even in the absence of abstinence.

Hepatitis C cure and medications for opioid use disorder improve health-related quality of life in patients with opioid use disorder actively engaged in substance use.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine whether Hepatitis C (HCV) treatment improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) actively engaged in substance use, and which variables are associated with improving HRQL in patients with OUD during HCV treatment. METHODS: Data are from a prospective, open-label, observational study of 198 patients with OUD or opioid misuse within 1 year of study enrollment who received HCV treatment with the primary endpoint of Sustained Virologic Response (SVR). HRQL was assessed using the Hepatitis C Virus Patient Reported Outcomes (HCV-PRO) survey, with higher scores denoting better HRQL. HCV-PRO surveys were conducted at Day 0, Week 12, and Week 24. A mixed-effects model investigated which variables were associated with changing HCV-PRO scores from Day 0 to Week 24. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 57 and were predominantly male (68.2%) and Black (83.3%). Most reported daily-or-more drug use (58.6%) and injection drug use (IDU) (75.8%). Mean HCV-PRO scores at Day 0 and Week 24 were 64.0 and 72.9, respectively. HCV-PRO scores at Week 24 improved compared with scores at Day 0 (8.7; p<0.001). Achieving SVR (10.4; p<0.001) and receiving medications for OUD (MOUD) at Week 24 (9.5; p<0.001) were associated with improving HCV-PRO scores. HCV-PRO scores increased at Week 24 for patients who experienced no decline in IDU frequency (8.1; p<0.001) or had a UDS positive for opioids (8.0; p<0.001) or cocaine (7.5; p=0.003) at Week 24. CONCLUSION: Patients with OUD actively engaged in substance use experience improvement in HRQL from HCV cure unaffected by ongoing substance use. Interventions to promote HCV cure and MOUD engagement could improve HRQL for patients with OUD.

"I got so much on my plate": Understanding care discontinuity for HIV and HCV among formerly incarcerated persons.

OBJECTIVE: To explore barriers to care continuity among formerly incarcerated persons with HIV and/or hepatitis C. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We draw on data from semi-structured interviews conducted in 2018-2019 with 30 formerly incarcerated persons and 10 care providers. Data were collected across two clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, and Washington, D.C. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited participants using a combination of nonprobability sampling techniques. Participants completed closed-ended questionnaires and took part in semi-structured interviews related to treatment barriers and incentives. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Interviews were transcribed using Express Scribe software and transcriptions were open coded using NVivo 12 software. An iterative process was used to relate and build upon emergent themes in interviews. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Our study illuminates both internal and external barriers to care continuity. The most common external barriers were system navigation and housing instability. Internal barriers consisted of overlapping issues related to mental health, substance use, and feelings of shame and/or denial. CONCLUSION: An overarching theme is that formerly incarcerated persons with HIV and/or HCV are grappling with numerous challenges that can threaten their health and health care. These barriers are cumulative, intersecting, and reciprocal.

PrEP Indications and PrEP Knowledge, Access, and Interest Among Individuals With HCV.

Background: Individuals with hepatitis C (HCV) represent a population that may benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), given the overlapping risk factors and transmission networks of HCV and HIV. This analysis assesses the prevalence of PrEP indications among individuals with HCV monoinfection and PrEP awareness, interest, and access in this population. Methods: GRAVITY was an observational study for the collection of epidemiologic data from individuals with HCV and/or HIV in Washington DC and Baltimore, with the present analysis limited to HCV-monoinfected patients. The prevalence of PrEP indications was determined using epidemiologic survey responses. Bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed for associations between PrEP indications and PrEP awareness, access, and interest. Results: Among 314 HCV-monoinfected participants, 109 (35%) had an indication for PrEP. Forty-eight (44%) had a drug use indication alone, 40 (37%) had a sexual indication alone, and 21 (19%) had both drug use and sexual indications. Eighty-five (27%) participants had heard of PrEP, 32 (10%) had been offered PrEP by a provider, 114 (38%) were interested or maybe interested in PrEP, and 6 (2%) were currently taking PrEP. On bivariate analysis, PrEP awareness was significantly associated with study site (P < .0001), race (P = .0003), age (P < .0001), and sexual PrEP indication (P = .04). However, only study site remained significant (P = .0002) on regression analysis. Conclusions: Though indications for PrEP were prevalent among individuals with HCV in this cohort, most patients were unaware of PrEP, had never been offered PrEP, and were not using PrEP. These data support the need for improved PrEP implementation among people with HCV.

Suboptimal Uptake, Retention, and Adherence of Daily Oral Prexposure Prophylaxis Among People With Opioid Use Disorder Receiving Hepatitis C Virus Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Daily oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) prevents human immunodeficiency (HIV) among people who inject drugs (PWID). Despite rising HIV incidence and injection drug use (IDU), PrEP use remains low and there is limited research about uptake, adherence, and retention among PWID. METHODS: The ANCHOR investigation evaluated a community-based care model collocating hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, medication for opioid use disorder (OUD), and PrEP in individuals in Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Maryland. PrEP counseling was conducted from HCV treatment day 0 until week 24. Subjects could start any time during this window, were followed for 48 weeks, and were assessed for adherence by self-report and dried blood spot TDF analysis. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight participants were enrolled, of whom 185 (93%) were HIV negative. Twenty-nine individuals (15.7% of HIV-negative cohort) initiated PrEP. One hundred sixteen participants (62.7%) met 2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) PrEP criteria due to IDU (82 [44.3%]), sex (9 [4.9%]), or both practices (25 [13.5%]). Providers recommended PrEP to 94 individuals (50.8%), and recommendation was associated with PrEP uptake. Median treatment duration was 104 days (interquartile range, 28-276 days), with 8 participants retained through week 48. Adherence was variable over time by self-report and declined by TDF analysis. No HIV seroconversions occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of people with HCV and OUD experienced low uptake of PrEP despite the majority meeting CDC criteria. High rates of disruption and discontinuation, compounded by variable adherence, made TDF/FTC a suboptimal prevention strategy. Emerging modalities like long-acting formulations may address these barriers, but PWID have been excluded from their development to date.

Initiation of Low-threshold Buprenorphine in Nontreatment Seeking Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Engaged in Hepatitis C Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The ANCHOR program offered buprenorphine treatment to people who inject drugs engaged in hepatitis C (HCV) treatment at a Washington, DC harm reduction organization. This analysis describes the program model and outcomes of the opioid care continuum at 1 year. METHODS: Primary outcomes were initiation of buprenorphine and retention in care, defined by an active buprenorphine prescription at given time points. Secondary outcomes included treatment interruptions, reasons for treatment noninitiation and termination, buprenorphine and opiate use, and HIV risk behaviors. Buprenorphine and opiate use were measured by urine toxicology screens and HIV risk behavior was quantified using a validated survey. RESULTS: Of 67 patients receiving HCV treatment not on opioid agonist therapy at baseline, 96% (n = 64) were interested and 73% (n = 49) initiated buprenorphine. Retention was 82% (n = 40), 65% (n = 32), and 59% (n = 29) at months 1, 6, and 12, respectively. Retention at 12 months was associated with self-reported engagement in routine medical care (P < 0.01), but was not associated with gender, stable housing, past opioid agonist therapy, or past overdose. Among retained patients, urine screens positive for opioids were 73% (n = 29), 56% (n = 18), and 79% (n = 23) at months 1, 6, and 12. There was a significant mean decrease in HIV risk-taking behavior scores over the treatment period, primarily driven by reduced injection frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Patients engaged in HCV treatment at a harm reduction organization showed a high rate of initiation of buprenorphine treatment, with retention comparable to other treatment settings. Although most patients continued using opioids on treatment, there was a reduced frequency of injection drug use, a significant driver of OUD-related risk. These data support the use of low-threshold buprenorphine access alongside HCV treatment to reduce morbidity and mortality in people with OUD.

Concurrent Initiation of Hepatitis C and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in People Who Inject Drugs.

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs have a high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and significant disease associated with drug use; however, HCV treatment often occurs in absence of interventions to address opioid use disorder and drug use-related harms. The impact of concurrent initiation of opioid agonist therapy (OAT) on HCV treatment and drug use outcomes is unknown. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, observational trial at a harm reduction organization's drop-in center in Washington, DC, 100 patients with chronic HCV infection, opioid use disorder, and ongoing injection drug use were treated with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12-weeks and offered buprenorphine initiation. The primary end point was sustained virologic response (SVR), and secondary end points included uptake of and retention in OAT, change in risk behavior, and determinants of SVR. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (82%) achieved SVR, which was not associated with baseline OAT status (P = .33), on-treatment drug use (P >.99), or imperfect daily adherence (P = .35) but was significantly associated with completing 2 or more 28-pill bottles of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (P < .001) and receiving OAT at week 24 (P = .01). Of 67 patients not already receiving OAT at baseline, 53 (79%) started OAT. At week 24, 68 (68%) patients were receiving OAT. Receipt of OAT was associated with fewer opiate-positive urine drug screens (P = .003), lower human immunodeficiency virus risk-taking behavior scores (P < .001), and lower rates of opioid overdose (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The Novel Model of Hepatitis C Treatment as an Anchor to Prevent HIV, Initiate Opioid Agonist Therapy, and Reduce Risky Behavior study demonstrates high uptake of buprenorphine collocated with HCV treatment, and it shows that concurrent initiation of OAT with HCV treatment can result in high rates of SVR while reducing risks associated with drug use. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03221309.