National specialty trends in billable diagnostic ultrasound in the ED: analysis of Medicare claims data.

OBJECTIVE: To assess recent national specialty trends in the use of diagnostic ultrasound (US) services in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. METHODS: We searched aggregated 1998-2012 Medicare Part B Master Files for ED diagnostic US studies, excluding cardiac and ophthalmic examinations. Studies were classified by body part and interpreting specialty. Subsequent analysis was performed for higher-volume services rendered by emergency physicians for which discrete codes were present longitudinally for complete vs limited examinations. National trends were analyzed. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2012, paid ED US studies interpreted by radiologists, emergency physicians, and all other physicians increased by 332% (from 221,712 to 735,858 examinations), 4454% (from 561 to 24,992), and 251% (from 26,961 to 67,787), respectively. The fraction of ED US examinations interpreted remained around 90% for radiologists, increased from 0.2% to 3% for emergency physicians, and decreased from 11% to 8% for other physicians. The fraction of complete abdominal and complete retroperitoneal studies interpreted by emergency physicians remained less than 1% from 1998 through 2012. However, emergency physicians experienced disproportionate growth in limited examinations (from 1% to 9% for abdominal studies and from <1% to 20% for retroperitoneal studies). Likewise, the fraction of (typically targeted) chest studies interpreted by emergency physicians increased from less than 1% to 63%. CONCLUSION: From 1998 to 2012, there was substantial growth in ED US studies for Medicare beneficiaries interpreted by radiologists and emergency physicians alike. For more commonly performed services distinguishable as complete vs limited in nature, growth in services by emergency physicians was most dramatic for less complex services.

The scope and distribution of imaging services at critical access hospitals.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to better understand the availability and scope of imaging services at critical access hospitals (CAHs) throughout the United States. METHODS: Recent American Hospital Association (AHA) annual survey data (containing 1,063 variables providing comprehensive information on organizational characteristics and availability of various services at 6,317 hospitals nationwide) and US census data were merged. Imaging survey data included mammography, ultrasound, CT, MRI, single photon emission CT, and combined PET/CT. Availability and characteristics of imaging services at the 1,060 CAHs in 45 states for which sufficient data were available were studied. RESULTS: Mammography, ultrasound, and some form of CT were the most widely available of all imaging services, but were available in all CAHs in only 13%, 33%, and 56% of all states, respectively. In no states were ≥64-slice CT, MRI, single photon emission CT, and combined PET/CT available in all CAHs. CONCLUSIONS: An overall scarcity of access to imaging services exists at CAHs throughout the United States. With 19.3% of the US population residing in rural areas and almost entirely dependent on CAHs for health services, the policy implications for imaging access could be profound. Further research is necessary to investigate the effect of imaging access on CAH patient outcomes.