Outcomes in Premenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer and Lymph Node Micrometastasis Based on the 21-Gene Recurrence Score.

BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) and 21-gene OncotypeDX (ODX) recurrence scores (RS) <26 do not benefit from chemoendocrine therapy ("CET") compared to endocrine monotherapy ("E"), regardless of nodal status. In premenopausal patients, nodal status is significant in interpretation of RS. However, guidelines are not explicit in recommendations for patients with micrometastasis ("pN1mi" staging). METHODS: A cohort of patients aged <50 years with HR+/HER2- EBC who underwent ODX testing was identified within the National Cancer Database 2004-2019 dataset. We confirmed the prognostic value of ODX in pN1mi disease with multivariate Cox regression for overall survival (OS). We explored how patterns of practice differed by nodal status in cases of low RS (<26) with chi-squared testing. Finally, we performed Kaplan-Meier models comparing OS for those with RS <26 receiving E versus CET, controlling for nodal status. RESULTS: Of 72 068 patients aged <50 years with HR+/HER2- EBC, 6.1% (n = 4402) had micrometastasis. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed prognostic value of ODX in this pN1mi cohort (P < .001). In the context of RS <26, CET was used most commonly in patients with 1-3 involved lymph nodes ("pN1a-c" disease), less frequently in pN1mi disease, and least in node-negative ("pN0") disease. A benefit in OS was observed in cases with RS <26 and pN1a-c receiving CET vs. E (P = .017), but not in pN1mi (P = .49) or pN0 (P = .57) disease. CONCLUSION: Our large registry analysis found CET was associated with improved OS in pN1a-c, but not in pN1mi or pN0 disease.

Geographic Origin may Affect Outcomes for Hispanic Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health thoroughly explored in the literature include insurance status, race, and ethnicity. There are over 50 million self-identifying Hispanics in the United States. This, however, represents a heterogeneous population. We used a national registry to investigate for significant differences in outcomes of Hispanic patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Unites states, by geographic region of origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of Hispanic patients in the Unites states with NSCLC for which region of origin was documented within the 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB) registry. This included patients from Cuba, Puerto Rico, Mexico, South and Central America, and the Dominican Republic. We performed multivariate logistic regression modeling to determine whether origin was a significant predictor of cancer staging at diagnosis, adjusting for age, sex, histology, grade, insurance status, and facility type. Race was not included due to a nonsignificant association with stage at diagnosis at the bivariate level in this cohort. Subsequently, we used Kaplan-Meier modeling to identify whether overall survival (OS) of Hispanic patients differed by origin. RESULTS: A total of 12,557 Hispanic patients with NSCLC were included in this analysis. The breakdown by origin was as follows: n = 2071 (16.5%) Cuban, n = 2360 (18.8%) Puerto Rican, n = 4950 (39.4%) Mexican, n = 2329 (18.5%) from South or Central America, and n = 847 (6.7%) from the Dominican Republic. After controlling for age, sex, histology, grade, insurance status and treating facility type, we found that geographic origin was a significant predictor of advanced stage at diagnosis (P = .015). Compared to Cubans, patients of Puerto Rican origin were less likely to present with advanced disease (68.4% vs. 71.9%; OR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.69-0.98; P = .026). We also identified a significant (log-rank P-value<.001) difference in OS by geographic origin, even at early-stages of diagnosis. Dominican patients with NSCLC exhibited the highest 5-year OS rate (63.3%), followed by patients from South/Central America (59.7%), Puerto Rico (52.3%), Mexico (45.9%), and Cuba (43.8%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that for Hispanic individuals living in the Unites states, region/country of origin is significantly associated with outcomes, even after accounting for other known determinants of health. We suggest that region of origin should be studied further as a potential determinant of outcomes in patients with cancer.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with HR+/HER2-Invasive lobular breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer (ILC) harbors unique clinicopathologic features. Data on optimal treatment modalities focusing on ILC remain scarce. We aim to investigate the benefit of chemotherapy in early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) ILC. METHODS: Female patients with early HR+/HER2- ILC (stages I-III) who underwent surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database (2010-2016) and grouped into four treatment cohorts: surgery only(S), chemotherapy alone (CT), endocrine therapy alone (ET), and combined chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (CET). Descriptive and bi-variate statistics summarized baseline characteristics and compared them across cohorts. A secondary analysis accounting for OncotypeDX (ODX) information was performed, stratifying for low (<26) and high (≥26) ODX. Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard models evaluated the relationship between treatment modality and overall survival (OS), stratifying for ODX scoring. RESULTS: N = 15,271 patients were included. The CET cohort (29.8%) was more likely to be younger and have no co-morbidities, advanced tumor stage or high ODX score (≥26). No significant difference in OS comparing ET to CET (HR:1.08, 95%CI:0.93-1.26, p = 0.31) was observed, adjusting for confounders. N = 5,561 patients had ODX results available. No significant difference in 5-year OS was observed comparing the ET to CET cohorts, both in patients an ODX score <26 (HR:1.10; 95%CI:0.69-1.76, p = 0.69) and ODX score ≥26 (HR:1.18; 95%CI:0.51-2.75, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy demonstrated no added survival benefit in HR+/HER2- ILC, even in tumors with ODX ≥26. Prospective trials identifying potential subgroups of patients with ILC who could benefit from chemotherapy are needed.

Does the 21-gene recurrence score have clinical utility in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer?

The 21-gene recurrence score assay has been validated as a predictive biomarker in early-stage HR+ and HER2-breast cancer. It is not indicated for use in HER2+ disease based on national guidelines. In this study, we assessed the value of 21-gene recurrence score (RS), or OncotypeDX (ODX), testing in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stages I-II, HR+/HER2+ breast cancer who received multi-gene testing with ODX. We then explored the prognostic and predictive value of this biomarker through various forms of survival modeling. ODX testing was performed in n = 5,280 patients. N = 2,678 patients (50.7%) had a RS < 26, while n = 2,602 (49.3%) had a RS ≥26. In Kaplan-Meier survival modeling for patients with recurrence scores <26, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.445) between patients receiving different systemic treatment regimens. However, when recurrence scores were ≥26, there was a statistically-significant difference in overall survival between systemic treatment regimens (p < 0.001). 5-year overall survival was highest (97.4%) for patients receiving triple therapy (anti-HER2 with chemotherapy and endocrine therapy), followed by those receiving dual therapy with endocrine and anti-HER2 (96.7%), and endocrine with chemotherapy (94.9%). Patients receiving endocrine therapy alone exhibited the lowest 5-year overall survival (88.5%). RESULTS: Analysis from this large national cancer registry suggests that multigene testing may have predictive value in treatment selection for patients with early-stage, HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Prospective trials are warranted to identify subgroups of patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer who can be spared anti-HER2 treatments and cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Disparities in Metabolic Conditions and Cancer Characteristics among Hispanic Women with Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

While the associations of common metabolic conditions with ethnicity have been previously described, disparity among Hispanic individuals based on country of origin is understudied. This multi-institutional analysis explored the prevalence of metabolic conditions and their association with cancer subtypes among Mexican and non-Mexican Hispanics. After IRB approval, we conducted a cross-sectional study at two academic medical centers with a significant Hispanic patient population (Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX (TTUHSC-EP) and Cleveland Clinic Florida in Weston, FL (CCF)). A total of n = 1020 self-identified Hispanic patients with breast cancer consecutively diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 were selected from the two institutional databases. Comparisons between Mexican and Non-Mexican Hispanics revealed variations in tumor types and metabolic conditions. Mexican Hispanics were found to have a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (27.8% vs. 14.2%, p < 0.001), obesity (51.0% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001), and ductal carcinoma type (86.6 vs. 73.4%, p < 0.001). On the other hand, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer was more common in non-Mexicans, while Mexicans had more triple-negative breast cancer, especially in premenopausal women. In addition to highlighting these variations among Hispanic patients with breast cancer, this study supports a more focused approach to addressing obesity and other metabolic conditions prevalent in the Hispanic population with breast cancer. Moreover, Hispanic individuals with breast cancer are diverse and should not be lumped under one category without reference to their country of origin regarding the impact of race and ethnicity.

Geographical Disparities and Factors Associated With the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Social determinants of health have been linked to treatment-related disparities in breast cancer. We analyzed data from a large national registry to explore factors related to accepting or declining recommended chemotherapy and whether patients' decisions vary geographically across the United States. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database to study treatment decision making in patients with advanced breast cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage III-IV) between 2004 and 2017. We focused the analysis on patients who were recommended chemotherapy by their physicians but who declined this treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of N = 215,284 patients with stage III and IV breast cancers were included. Patients in the New England region were more likely to refuse chemotherapy compared with the rest, with patients in the East South Central regions (AL, KY, MS, and TN) and West South Central (AR, LA, OK, and TX) noted to be least likely to refuse chemotherapy. Factors related to a higher rate of refusal by patients included older age > 70 years; hormone receptor-positive tumors; and having higher comorbidity. Patients identified as Hispanic, those who are privately insured, and patients at academic institutions were less likely to decline chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This analysis identified a significant difference in rates of refusal of recommended chemotherapy by geographical location, insurance status, and treatment facility after adjusting for known social determinants of health. Further understanding of the factors affecting treatment decisions would be important to improve the efficacy of care delivery in patients with cancer and reduce reversible causes of disparity.

Management of HR+/HER2+ lobular breast cancer and trends do not mirror better outcomes.

PURPOSE: Treatment protocols for invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) have largely followed those for invasive ductal breast cancer. This study compares treatment outcomes of endocrine therapy versus combined chemo-endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-positive (HER2+) ILC tumors in a large national registry. METHODS: We sampled the National Cancer Database (2010-2016) for female patients with stages I-III, HR+/HER2+ ILC who underwent surgery. Cochran-Armitage trend test examined trends of treatment regimen administration: Surgery only (S), chemotherapy (C), endocrine therapy (ET), and combined chemo-endocrine therapy (CET), with or without anti-HER2 therapy. Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare overall survival (OS) across ET and CET cohorts, stratifying for anti-HER2 therapy, before and after propensity score match of cohorts (2013-2016). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were also produced. RESULTS: N=11,421 were included. 58.7% of patients received Anti-Her2 therapy after 2013. CET conferred better OS over ET in the unmatched (adjusted-5-year-OS: 92.5% vs. 81.1%, p<0.001) and PS-matched (90.4% vs. 84.5%, p=0.001) samples. ET caused lower OS in patients who received Anti-Her2 therapy (HR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.60-4.12, p<0.001) and patients who did not (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.21-2.78, p=0.004), as compared to CET on multivariable analysis. KM modeling showed highest OS in the CET cohort who received Anti-Her2 (93.0%), followed by the CET cohort who did not receive Anti-Her2 (90.2%) (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy and Anti-Her2 therapy was shown to be the most effective treatment modality in HR+/HER2+ ILC, contrasting previous data on the inconclusive benefit of chemotherapy in patients with ILC.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Updates on Classification and Treatment in 2021.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy affecting women. It is a highly heterogeneous disease broadly defined by the differential expression of cell surface receptors. In the United States, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 15 to 20% of all BC. When compared with other subtypes of BC, TNBC tends to present in younger women, and has a higher mortality rate of 40% in advanced stages within the first 5 years after diagnosis. TNBC has historically had limited treatment options when compared to other types of BC. The mainstay of treatment for TNBC remains cytotoxic chemotherapy despite the emergence of new biologic and targeted agents. Defining the specific tumor molecular profile including PDL-1 and androgen receptor testing is expanding treatment options in the clinical setting. Identifying more targetable, novel biomarkers that may better define therapeutic targets or prognostic markers is currently underway. TNBC nomenclature is expected to be updated in favor of other nomenclature which would help direct therapy, and further redefine TNBC's heterogeneity. Given the continuous advances in the field of TNBC, this review assesses the latest developments in basic characterization, subtyping, and treatment of TNBC, including novel drug developments with antibody-drug conjugates, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PARP inhibitors and androgen receptor targeted agents. Future trials are necessary in the face of these innovations to further support the use of new therapies in TNBC and the detection of the appropriate biomarkers.

Factors Associated With the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-stage, ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer and High-risk Scoring on Genomic Assays.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of refusal of chemotherapy ranges from 3% to 19%, but varies widely by patient profile and treatment setting. Using a large national registry, we explore factors significantly associated with the decision to decline chemotherapy in patients with early-stage, HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) despite high risk scoring on multigene sequencing analysis for OncotypeDX (ODX) or MammaPrint (MP), in which the survival benefit of chemotherapy is clear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HR+/HER2- BC and high risk scoring on ODX (score >26) or MP were selected from the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Only those who refused to get chemotherapy despite their physician's recommendations were included. Univariate frequency and proportion statistics were used to describe the patient cohort. Bivariate Chi-square analysis evaluated the association between refusal of recommended chemotherapy and sociodemographic characteristics. Significant variables (P < .05) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: N = 43,533 patients were included (88.7% ODX, 11.3% MP). A total of n = 4415 (10.1%) patients declined chemotherapy despite recommendation by the patient's primary oncologist. Age >70 (OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.96-4.04, P < .001), black race (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36, P = .01), non-private insurance, lobular carcinoma histology (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.35, P < .001), and tumor grade of I significantly predicted chemotherapy decline. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing many of the factors that contribute to under-treatment in minorities is to be key to reducing cancer disparity and improving equity in cancer care and outcome.

Metastasectomy versus radiation of secondary sites in stage IV breast cancer: Analysis from a national cancer registry.

PURPOSE: Locoregional therapy at primary or secondary sites in breast cancer may be associated with improved survival as compared to systemic therapy alone. We explored the sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors associated with the use of radiation versus surgical resection of metastatic sites (metastasectomy) in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, followed by the associated overall survival. METHODS: We sampled the National Cancer Database for patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, (2010-2017) and described cohort's characteristics using univariate analyses. We identified 5 subgroups based on malignant site involvement: 1. Bone only, 2. Brain only, 3. Liver only, 4. Lung only, and 5. Metastasis involving >1 site. Kaplan-Meier modeling with log-rank testing and multivariate Cox Regression analysis were used to explore differences in overall survival between those that received radiation at secondary sites and those that underwent metastasectomy. RESULTS: N = 22,749patients were included in this analysis. Radiation (81.2%) was used more commonly than metastasectomy (28.8%). Metastasectomy was associated with better median overall survival across all 5 cohorts (p < .001), with the survival benefit being the most pronounced with lung only (OS: 56.9 months; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p = .032), or liver only (OS: 41.6 months; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.7-1.1, p < .001) metastasis. CONCLUSION: Metastasectomy in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer may be associated with improved overall survival as compared to radiation of secondary lesions, particularly in those with only liver or lung involvement. Prospective randomized controlled trials investigating surgical resection of metastatic sites in patients with breast cancer are warranted.

Survival benefit of a combined surgical approach in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported survival benefit of surgery in patients with stage IV breast cancer (BC); prospective trials yielded inconclusive results. METHODS: We sampled the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) for de novo stage IV BC patients undergoing both primary site resection and metastasectomy. A multivariate Cox-regression survival model investigated the overall survival (OS) of this surgical approach as compared to lumpectomy/mastectomy alone, metastasectomy alone, or no surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to demonstrate the utility of surgery when metastasis were confined to 1 site stratifying by tissue type. RESULTS: A total of n = 55,125 patients were included. As compared to lumpectomy/mastectomy alone (43 months), lumpectomy/mastectomy + metastasectomy exhibited the best OS (50 months, p = 0.012), metastasectomy alone showed slightly worse OS (30 months, p < 0.0001), and no surgery had the worst OS (21 months, p < 0.0001). In metastasis confined to 1 site, superior OS with combined lumpectomy/mastectomy and metastasectomy versus lumpectomy/mastectomy alone was observed with liver (72.8 vs. 48.1 months, p < 0.001) or lung (49.2 vs. 36.8 months, p < 0.001) metastasis but not bone (52.2 vs. 49.9 months, p < 0.001) or brain (16.2 vs. 15.5 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic BC undergoing primary site resection and metastasectomy exhibited optimal OS, particularly when metastasis involved only the liver or lung.

Clinical and Demographic Factors, Treatment Patterns, and Overall Survival Associated With Rare Triple-Negative Breast Carcinomas in the US.

Importance: Triple-negative breast cancers are known collectively to demonstrate a more aggressive clinical course and earlier recurrence than cancers of other histological subtypes. However, the literature on rare triple-negative breast cancers and the association of histological type with survival and risk of metastasis is sparse. Objective: To present the clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) for histologically rare (<10% of breast cancers) triple-negative breast cancer types: medullary carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and metaplastic breast carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was performed in the US using data reported by the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2016. Confirmed cases of medullary carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and metaplastic breast cancer were analyzed. Univariable analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were performed. Data analysis was performed from April to May 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 5-year OS. Secondary outcomes included site of metastasis, effect of immunohistochemistry, management, and 2-year mortality. Results: A total of 8479 patients with breast cancer (mean [SD] age; 62.6 [14.3] years; 8435 women [99.48%]) were analyzed. Metaplastic carcinoma was the most commonly diagnosed histological type in this cohort, with 6867 patients (81%), followed by 1357 (16%) with adenoid cystic carcinoma and only 255 (3%) with medullary carcinoma. Medullary carcinoma presented earlier in life, at a median (interquartile range) age of 53 (45-62) years, compared with 62 (53-72) years for patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma and 63 (52-74) years for patients with metaplastic carcinoma. The proportion of tumors with triple-negative immunohistochemistry varied by histological type for medullary carcinoma (57 patients [22.4%]), adenoid cystic carcinoma (653 patients [48.1%]), and metaplastic carcinoma (3637 patients [53.0%]). Patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma were less likely to receive radiotherapy (711 patients [52.4%]) and chemotherapy (175 patients [12.9%]) compared with patients with medullary carcinoma (radiotherapy, 156 patients [61.2%]; chemotherapy, 190 patients [74.5%]) and metaplastic carcinoma (radiotherapy, 3416 patients [49.7%]; chemotherapy, 4709 patients [68.6%]). The 5-year OS rate was superior for patients with medullary (91.7%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (88.4%) compared with patients with metaplastic carcinoma (63.1%). The 5-year mortality rate for adenoid cystic carcinoma was 8.33% vs 36.91% for metaplastic carcinoma. Conclusions and Relevance: Nationally, over the course of 7 years, medullary carcinoma was most common and metaplastic carcinoma had the worst 5-year OS among the rare histological breast cancer subtypes analyzed. Factors associated with a poor prognosis for metaplastic carcinoma included advanced stage, lung metastasis, older age, and not receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Future research focusing on rare subtypes of breast cancer is desirable and could inform the optimal management of these relatively understudied carcinomas.

Newly-identified Pathways Relating Vitamin D to Carcinogenesis: A Review.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiological relationship between vitamin D levels and cancer has been thoroughly investigated. Published data from large studies appear to corroborate a significant relationship between higher serum vitamin D concentrations and improved survival. Mechanistic reviews on commonly-studied cancers - including breast cancer, colon cancer and melanoma - focus predominantly on data from older studies. In outlining avenues for future research, we believe there is utility in summarizing novel findings introduced to the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this narrative review, we used MEDLINE, PUBMED and Cochrane databases to identify mechanistic studies published from January 1, 2015 onwards exploring this topic. RESULTS: Twenty-five mechanistic studies were included in this review. It was found that vitamin D plays a critical role in both direct (i.e. tumor gene expression, proliferation, invasiveness, sensitivity to chemotherapy etc.) and indirect (i.e. effects on the tumor microenvironment and immunomodulation) tumor suppression mechanisms. CONCLUSION: These newly-identified pathways warrant further research, with the hopes that we may understand how and when vitamin D supplementation can be integrated into precision medicine therapeutics for cancers of the breast, colon and skin. Cancer care providers should consider recommendations to screen for vitamin D deficiency in this population.

Effect of immunotherapy on overall survival in limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma: a national cancer database analysis.

BACKGROUND: While immune-based therapies have been approved for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, there is limited data on the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with limited-stage disease. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database to first evaluate factors associated with the inclusion of immunotherapy as part of the initial therapeutic course in patients diagnosed with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Consequently, we evaluated the impact of this immunotherapy on 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS). We did this by performing 1:1 matching for controls that did not receive immunotherapy, and comparing survival between cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients with LS-SCLC received immunotherapy as part of their initial therapeutic regimen. Age and facility type were the only significant predictors of the use of immunotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference between matched case-control cohorts in median OS (p = 0.985), 2-year OS (p = 0.747), and 5-year OS (p = 0.934). CONCLUSION: In this study using a large national database, we found that the inclusion of immunotherapy as part of the initial systemic therapy regimen was not significantly associated with improved OS in a cohort of LS-SCLC patients.

Histologic Transformation in an Untreated Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia After 14 Years: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by lymphoplasmacytic histology in the bone marrow with monoclonal IgM. Median survival can be in excess of 10 years. The 5-year cumulative incidence of death is low at about 10%. One-third of all-cause specific mortality is due to the lymphoma for which histologic transformation (HT) is rare. Here we present a case of a 60-year-old man with longstanding untreated WM, presenting with minimally symptomatic transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with an accompanying review of the literature. Transformed WM, diagnosed greater than 5 years, has a reported survival period of 8 - 9 months. This case highlights that after a decade of continued stability in WM, not requiring treatment, an acute change in laboratory data with minimally progressive IgM levels, in the absence of B symptoms and clinical findings, may be the harbinger of transformation and at the time of diagnosis can have a rapidly deteriorating clinical course. In this case, the tripling of the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as the primary drastic change demonstrates the importance of the rapid increase in LDH as a singly reliable marker for HT. Late transformation has been borne out as a negative variable as the generally indolent course of WM is curtailed with the poor outcome in HT. Although MYD88 wildtype is a possible predictive factor for transformation, it is unclear if late transformation is clonally or non-clonally related and further molecular investigation is needed.

Male Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis from the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) in males accounts for <0.5% of all male cancer diagnoses and ~1% of all BCs in the United States. We sought to describe clinicopathologic characteristics among male and female BC patients and differences in overall survival (OS) through the National Cancer Database over 13 years (2004-2016). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Secondary to the 1:99 ratio of male to female BC cases, we randomly selected female cases for equal comparison to males cases by diagnosis year. Chi-square and t-tests compared demographic and tumor characteristics. OS was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Among the ~2.7 million BC patients, 9 per 1,000 BCs were in males, the rate remained similar over time. The mean (SD) age was 64.9±13.0 years for males and 60.7±13.6 years for females. Most of the male BC cases were white (non-Hispanic) (n=19,015 [80.2%]), clinical stage I (n=7,353 [32.1%]) or stage II disease (n=7,923 [34.6%]), and tumors were moderate or poorly differentiated (84.5%). Males exhibited more comorbidities, presented with a larger proportion of disease, and decreased OS (p<0.005) than females. Male OS was >10% lower at 5-years and nearly 20% lower at 10-years for males. More males had primary BC tumors under the nipple; the 10-year OS rate for this site was 48.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports clinicopathologic characteristics of a large cohort of male BC. Males present at older age, with a greater comorbidity index, at later stages of disease. Increased education regarding the continued risks of male breast cancer may be warranted.

Effect of Surgery at Primary and Metastatic Sites in Patients With Stage IV Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear evidence of a survival benefit of resection of the primary tumor, or distant site resection (metastasectomy) in patients with stage IV breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of stage IV breast cancer using the National Cancer Database. To evaluate variables associated with surgery at the primary site, we used univariate analyses followed by multivariate logistic regression. Consequently, we evaluated the impact of lumpectomy, mastectomy or metastasectomy on survival by conducting multivariate Cox regression survival analyses on the following groups: all stage IV patients; a subset of those with only one metastatic site; and another subset with metastasis to multiple distant sites. RESULTS: A total of 54,871 stage IV breast cancer patients were included in this analysis. Variables associated with the use of surgery at the primary were: age, race, Charlson/Deyo score, insurance and facility type, involved breast quadrant, receptor status, N stage, extent of metastasis, and year of diagnosis. Survival analysis showed that both lumpectomy (median overall survival [OS], 45 months) and mastectomy (median OS, 44 months) were associated with better OS compared to no surgery (median OS, 22 months). The statistical effect was larger in the subgroup with metastasis to one site, but still significant in the subgroup with multiple metastatic sites. Distant site resection also yielded a survival benefit. CONCLUSION: In patients with metastasis to only one site, metastasectomy was associated with better OS when that site was the liver, lung, or brain.

Prognostic and Predictive Value of Circulating and Disseminated Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) Analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Our understanding of the utility of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) as clinical biomarkers continues to evolve. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated (1) clinicopathologic factors associated with the presence of CTCs or DTCs, (2) the prognostic value of CTCs or DTCs by disease stage, 3), the value of these biomarkers in predicting the benefit of chemotherapy. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with breast cancer (BC) diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). To evaluate variables associated with the presence of CTCs or DTCs at the univariate level, we used chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were then constructed using significant variables. Consequently, we included CTC or DTC status (i.e. positive or negative) in multivariate, stage-by-stage Cox regression analyses for overall survival (OS). After stratifying by receptor status and staging, we used the Kaplan-Meier method to explore chemotherapy efficacy in CTC- or DTC-positive vs. CTC- or DTC-negative subsets. RESULTS: Factors significantly associated with CTCs were race, progesterone receptor status, HER2 status, histology and AJCC N- and M-staging. Factors associated with DTCs were race, HER2 status, histology and AJCC N-staging. CTCs were associated with poor OS in late-stage (III and IV) but not early-stage (0-II) BC. DTCs were not significantly associated with OS in either context. In hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease, chemotherapy was associated with better OS when CTC status was positive, both in early-stage and late-stage disease. In a subset of patients without CTCs, however, chemotherapy conferred no survival benefit. DTC status was not a significant predictor of chemotherapy efficacy in early or late-stage, HR+ disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CTC-status is a significant prognostic factor at later stages of BC; yet it can also help guide management of early-stage disease as it appears predictive for chemotherapy benefit.

Breast Cancer in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Overview.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women. It encompasses considerable heterogeneity in pathology, patient clinical characteristics, and outcome. This study describes factors associated with overall survival (OS) of breast cancer in an updated national database. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 based on the National Cancer Database. Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies/percentages, whereas continuous variables were summarized using the median/interquartile range (IQR). OS was explored using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Data from n = 2,671,549 patients were analyzed. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range 18-90). 75% were non-Hispanic (NH) White; 11% were NH-Black; 4.7% were Hispanic-White; 0.1% were Hispanic-Black; and 3.4% were Asian. Most cases (73%) presented with ductal carcinoma histology; while 15% with lobular carcinoma. Rarer subtypes included epithelial-myoepithelial, fibroepithelial, metaplastic, and mesenchymal tumors. OS was associated with molecular subtype, histologic subtype, and AJCC clinical staging. Survival also correlated with race: a cohort including Asians and Pacific Islanders had the best survival, while Black patients had the worst. Finally, facility type also impacted outcome: patients at academic centers had the best survival, while those at community cancer programs had the worst. CONCLUSION: This large database provides a recent and comprehensive overview of breast cancer over 12 years. Molecular subtype, histologic subtype, stage, race, and facility type were correlated with OS. In addition to the educational perspective of this overview, significant factors impacting the outcome identified here should be considered in future cancer research on disparities.