Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiol Oncol ; 52(2): 204-212, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30018525

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to find out whether there is a difference in the early parameters of cardiotoxicity (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) between the two groups of patients: the patients treated for left breast cancer (left breast cancer group) and those treated for the right breast cancer (right breast cancer group), after the treatment had been completed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 175 consecutive patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive early breast cancer, treated concurrently with trastuzumab and radiotherapy (RT), between June 2005 and December 2010. Echocardiography with LVEF measurement was performed before adjuvant RT (LVEF0) and after the completed treatment (LVEF1,). After the treatment NT-proBNP measurement was done as well. The difference (Δ) between LVEF0 and LVEF1 was analysed (Δ LVEF = LVEF0 - LVEF1) and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 84 patients in the left and 91 in the right breast cancer group. Median observation time was 57 (37-71) months. Mean Δ LVEF (%) was -1.786% in the left and -2.607% in the right breast cancer group (p = 0.562, CI: -2.004 to 3.648). Median NT-proBNP were 111.0 ng/l in the left and 90.0 ng/l in the right breast cancer group (p = 0.545). Echocardiography showed that the patients in the left breast cancer group did not have significantly worse systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in comparison with the patients in the right breast cancer group, but, they had higher incidence of pericardial effusion (9 [11%] vs. 1 [1%]) (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any significant differences in the early parameters of cardiotoxicity (LVEF, NT-proBNP) between the observed groups. Patients who received left breast/chest wall irradiation had higher incidence of pericardial effusion.

2.
Radiol Oncol ; 48(2): 105-12, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24991199

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab therapy given in combination with one of several chemotherapy regimens is currently considered the standard of care for the treatment of early-stage, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) -positive breast cancer. The treatment with trastuzumab is due to a significant impact on the survival part of the standard adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients treated with postoperative breast or chest wall irradiation receive trastuzumab concomitant with radiotherapy. In a small proportion of patients trastuzumab causes cardiotoxicity. Preclinical findings indicate a radiosensibilizing effect of trastuzumab in breast cancer cells, but it is not yet clear whether it radiosensibilizes cells of healthy tissues too. CONCLUSIONS: Special attention is required when left breast or left thoracic wall is irradiated in patient receiving trastuzumab, because long-term effects of the concurrent treatment with trastuzumab and radiotherapy are not yet known. In an era where more patients are surviving a diagnosis of breast cancer, better understanding and earlier detection of therapy-induced cardiac toxicity will be of paramount importance.

3.
Breast J ; 16(2): 183-8, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20030645

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare the impact of postoperative radiotherapy, whether it was based on the clinical stage at presentation of the disease or on the pathological downstaged disease after initial chemotherapy for non-inflammatory locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We retrospectively analyzed locoregional recurrence (LRR), relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) in 55 patients treated for non-inflammatory LABC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery with or without radiotherapy. The mean follow-up was 55 months. The 3-year OS was 74%, DFS 73% and RFS 87%. The OS and DFS benefit was seen in those receiving radiation, with a mean OS of 89 months versus 68 months (p = 0.029) and mean DFS of 72 months versus 54 months (p = 0.029). Total LRR was 11% (8% versus 17% in the non-radiotherapy group, p = 0.349) and mean RFS of 95 months versus 86 months (p = 0.164). If the treatment planning was to be based on the original extent of the disease, then all patients in our study should have received adjuvant radiotherapy. Significantly lower OS and DFS without the addition of radiotherapy suggests that indication for radiation treatment should be based on the clinical pre-chemotherapy stage rather than the pathological post-chemotherapy stage. Radiation should therefore always be considered regardless of the response to initial chemotherapy for non-inflammatory LABC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...