Endovascular outcomes for anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior choroidal artery (AchoA) aneurysms are relatively rare compared to other types of aneurysms. However, the occurrence of transient or permanent occlusion of the choroidal artery during endovascular or surgical treatment is an uncommon but potentially serious complication. In this study, we aim to investigate the safety and efficacy profile of endovascular treatment (EVT) for AchoA aneurysms. METHODS: The primary outcome of interest was angiographic and clinical outcomes. Secondary outcome variables transient and permanent ischemic complications, symptomatic choroidal artery occlusion and retreatment rates. A random-effects model was used to calculate prevalence rates and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the complication rates for Type 1(arterial type, directly arising from ICA) and Type 2(neck type, arising from AchoA branch)) AchoA aneurysms, ruptured vs non-ruptured and for flow diverter (FD) treatment versus coiling. RESULTS: Our study included 10 studies with 416 patients with 430 AchoA aneurysms. The overall good clinical outcome rate (mRS score 0-2) is 94.5 % with a retreatment rate of 2.0 %. A subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference between coiling(75.3 %) and flow diverter(80.9 %) treatment in terms of complete occlusion(p-value:0.62). Overall permanent complication rate is 1.4 % (p-value:0.54) and transient ischemic complications rate is 4.2 %(p-value:0.61). Symptomatic choroidal artery occlusion rate is 0.8 %(p-value:0.51)Type 2 AchoA aneurysms had a significantly higher complication rate of 9.8 % (p-value<0.05) compared to Type 1 aneurysms. Unruptured aneurysms have significantly better clinical outcomes than ruptured aneurysms(OR: 0.11; [0.02;0.5], p-value:<0.05) CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of AchoA aneurysms demonstrated positive clinical results, with low rates of retreatment and complications. Coiling and flow diverters proved similar outcomes in achieving aneurysm occlusion. Ruptured aneurysms have lower good clinical outcomes comparing to unruptured aneurysms. Type 2 AchoA aneurysms had a higher risk of complications compared to Type 1.

Endovascular embolization of cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistula: a comprehensive systematic review on its efficacy and safety for the management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-venous fistula can cause spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) and poses a significant diagnostic and management challenge. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical and radiological outcomes of endovascular embolization as a novel treatment approach for CSF-venous fistula in patients with SIH. This systematic review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the embolization procedure in occlusion of the CSF-venous fistula, and secondary outcomes included procedural complications and improvement of clinical symptoms and radiological findings. A total of nine studies consisting of 77 patients met the inclusion criteria. Orthostatic and/or Valsalva headache was the most common symptom. The mean age of the patients was 57 ± 8.9 years, and females accounted for 59.7% (46/77) of the cases. Sixty-five (84.4%) patients reported complete resolution or significant improvement in symptoms. The Bern score, Headache Impact Test-6, and the Patient Global Impression of Change scales demonstrated significant improvements in radiological findings and patients' quality of life. Following the procedure, 22 patients (28.6%) experienced rebound intracranial hypertension and 27 patients (35.1%) had transient local pain at the site of the embolization. Our study showed that endovascular embolization is a safe and effective treatment for CSF-venous fistula in patients with SIH, providing complete resolution or significant improvement of clinical symptoms and radiological findings, and positive impacts on patients' quality of life.

Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in M1 occlusion patients with or without hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The comparison of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) outcomes between patients with the hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (HMCAS) and non-HMCAS is important to evaluate the impact of this radiological finding on treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between HMCAS and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing thrombectomy, comparing the outcomes over non-HMCAS. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library to identify studies on MT outcomes for M1 occlusions of HMCAS over non-HMCAS. Inclusion criteria encompassed modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and successful recanalization. Using R software version 4.1.2, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The meta-analysis was performed for 5 studies with 724 patients. There was no association found between presence of HMCAS and achieving mRS 0-2 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.29-1.47; p = .544). Mortality analysis also showed no significant association with presence of HMCAS (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.37-1.65; p = .520). No significant difference in sICH risk (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.24-9.66; p = .646) was found between groups. Recanalization analysis showed a non-significant positive association (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.67-2.28; p = .501). Heterogeneity was observed in all analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that there is no statistically significant difference in mRS scores, mortality, sICH, and recanalization success rates between the HMCAS and non-HMCAS groups.