Digital artery flow hemodynamics: An ultrasonographic study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data regarding the baseline hemodynamic blood flow parameters of the wrist and digits. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the digital and radial artery blood flow parameters using ultrasound and assess the influence of patient characteristics on hemodynamics. METHODS: We analyzed ultrasonographic data from 25 patients (50 hands) between October 2019 and December 2021. Variables of interest included dimensions of the radial artery and index finger (IF) ulnar and radial digital arteries at the palmodigital crease and their corresponding flow parameters. We compared variables among men and women and patients with and without diabetes using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 18 women (36 hands) and three participants with diabetes (six hands). The mean diameter of the IF radial digital artery was 7 mm, and that of the ulnar digital artery was 10 mm. The average peak systolic velocity for the radial digital artery was 21.31 cm/sec, and for the ulnar digital artery, it was 30.03 cm/sec. Comparing men and women, the only significant difference found was in the time-averaged mean velocity for the ulnar digital artery (men:5.66 cm/sec vs. women:9.68 cm/sec, P = 0.02) and volume of flow for the ulnar digital artery (men:10.87cc/min vs. women:18.58cc/min, P = 0.03). We found no differences in blood flow parameters comparing participants with and without diabetes. CONCLUSION: These data provide a baseline measurement of digital flow hemodynamics that can be used in future studies to model vascular flow after replantation.

Cohort study of new off-label gabapentin prescribing in chronic opioid users.

INTRODUCTION: Gabapentin is commonly prescribed as an off-label adjunct to opioids because of its safer risk profile. Recent evidence has shown an increased risk of mortality when coprescribed with opioids. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether the addition of off-label gabapentin in patients with chronic opioid use is associated with a reduction in opioid dosage. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic opioid use with a new off-label gabapentin prescription (2010-2019). Our primary outcome of interest was a reduction in opioid dosage measured via oral morphine equivalents (OME) per day after the addition of a new off-label gabapentin prescription. RESULTS: In our cohort of 172,607 patients, a new off-label gabapentin prescription was associated with a decrease in opioid dosage in 67,016 patients (38.8%) (median OME/day reduction:13.8), with no change in opioid dosage in 24,468 patients (14.2%), and an increase in opioid dosage in 81,123 patients (47.0%) (median OME/day increase: 14.3). A history of substance/alcohol use disorders was associated with a decrease in opioid dosage after the addition of a new off-label gabapentin (aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.23). A history of pain disorders was associated with a decrease in opioid dosage after the initiation of a new gabapentin prescription including arthritis (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.15), back pain (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.12), and other pain conditions (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.10). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with chronic opioid use, an off-label gabapentin prescription did not reduce opioid dosage in the majority of patients. The coprescribing of these medications should be critically evaluated to ensure optimal patient safety.

Catastrophic Health Expenditures Associated With Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: Distal radius fracture is one of the most common upper-extremity traumatic injuries. These injuries result in time off work and potential financial consequences for patients. Therefore, we aimed to understand the risk of catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs) after open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures and examine the association between patient characteristics and the risk of CHE. METHODS: We used data from patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radius fracture from a large, urban, level I trauma center (2018-2020). The risk of CHE was defined as out-of-pocket expenses of ≥40% of postsubsistence income. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the impact of age, sex, race, and insurance status on the risk of CHE. RESULTS: In our cohort of 394 patients, 121 patients (30.7%) were at risk of CHE after their distal radius fracture. After controlling for patient characteristics and insurance status, patients aged 26-34 years were 5.7 times more likely to be at risk of CHE (odds ratio, 5.73; 95% CI, 1.81-18.13) than patients aged ≥65 years. Patients who were uninsured were six times more likely to be at risk of CHE than patients with employer-sponsored health insurance (odds ratio, 6.02; 95% CI, 1.94-18.66). Lastly, non-White patients were at a higher risk of CHE (odds ratio, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.70-7.79) than White patients. CONCLUSIONS: Distal radius fractures are unexpected and place patients at risk of financial harm, with one in three patients at risk of CHEs. Policies aimed at minimizing cost-sharing after traumatic injury may help alleviate the financial consequences of health care delivery and reduce disparities. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis II.

Predictors and Variation in Steroid Injection Use for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from a Multicenter Quality Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Steroid injections are commonly used as first-line treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); however, research has shown that their benefit is generally short-term and many patients go on to receive carpal tunnel release. The study purpose was to determine the variation in steroid injection use by hand surgeons. METHODS: We analyzed data from a 9-center hand surgery quality collaborative. Data from 1,586 patients (2,381 hands) were included if they underwent elective CTR at one of the sites. Mixed effects logistic regression models were used to examine the association of receipt of steroid injection and association of receipt of more than one steroid injection among patient-level covariates. RESULTS: Steroid injection use significantly varied by practice, ranging from 12-53% of patients. The odds of receiving a steroid injection were 1.4 times higher for females (p<0.01), 1.6 times higher for patients with chronic pain syndrome (p<0.01), 0.5 times lower for patients with moderate electromyography (EMG) and 0.4 times lower for patients with severe EMG classification (both p<0.01). Patients with high CTS-6 scores (p=0.02) and patients with moderate (p=0.04) or severe EMG (p=0.05) had lower odds of receiving multiple steroid injections. Complete symptomatic improvement after steroid injection was significantly reported by patients with high CTS-6 score (p=0.03) or patients with severe EMG classification (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found wide patient-level and practice-level variation in the use of steroid injections prior to undergoing CTR. These findings underscore the need for improved data and standard practice guidelines regarding which patients benefit from steroid injection.

Racial Disparities in the Cost of Unplanned Hospitalizations after Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Given the national attention to disparities in health care, understanding variation provided to minorities becomes increasingly important. This study will examine the effect of race on the rate and cost of unplanned hospitalizations after breast reconstruction procedures. METHODS: The authors performed an analysis comparing patients undergoing implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The authors evaluated the rate of unplanned hospitalizations and associated expenditures among patients of different races. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine the association among race and readmissions and health care expenditures. RESULTS: The cohort included 17,042 patients. The rate of an unplanned visit was 5%. The rates of readmissions among black patients (6%) and Hispanic patients (7%) in this study are higher compared with white patients (5%). However, after controlling for patient-level characteristics, race was not an independent predictor of an unplanned visit. In our expenditure model, black patients [adjusted cost ratio, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.66)] and Hispanic patients [adjusted cost ratio, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.65)] experienced greater cost for their readmission compared with white patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although race is not an independent predictor of an unplanned hospital visit after surgery, racial minorities bear a higher cost burden after controlling for insurance status, further stimulating health care disparities. Adjusted payment models may be a strategy to reduce disparities in surgical care. In addition, direct and indirect measures of disparities should be used when examining health care disparities to identify consequences of inequities more robustly.

Gabapentinoid Prescribing for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentinoids, including gabapentin and pregabalin, are commonly prescribed for neuropathic pain, but robust evidence recommends against using gabapentinoids for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We aimed to quantify national prescribing patterns of gabapentinoids for CTS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study using claims data of gabapentinoid-naïve patients with a new diagnosis of CTS (2009-2016). Our primary outcome was a new gabapentinoid fill for CTS. We assessed temporal trends and characteristics associated with a gabapentinoid fill. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between patient-level factors and a new gabapentinoid fill for CTS. RESULTS: Of the 248 324 previously gabapentinoid-naïve patients with CTS, 9589 patients (4%) filled a gabapentinoid prescription. Sixty-one percent were prescribed by primary care providers or medical subspecialists. Patients with a history of neck pain (odds ratio [OR]: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.38), back pain (OR: 1.25, 95% CI, 1.20-1.31), arthritis (OR: 1.25, 95% CI, 1.18-1.31), and other pain conditions (OR: 1.26, 95% CI, 1.20-1.31) were associated with an increased odds of a new gabapentinoid fill. In addition, patients with a history of alcohol or substance use disorder were significantly associated with a new gabapentinoid prescription fill (OR: 1.33, 95% CI, 1.20-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence recommending against the use of gabapentinoids for CTS, gabapentinoids were frequently initiated among those with higher risk for misuse, including substance use disorders. Given the effectiveness of bracing or surgery for CTS and the risks associated with gabapentinoids, efforts aimed at disseminating evidence-based treatment for CTS are critical to minimize the harms of gabapentinoid misuse.

A Quality Collaborative Study of the Concordance of Electrodiagnostic Scores and Clinical Severity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Electrodiagnostic studies are commonly used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. However, these examinations are prone to false-positive and false-negative values. The authors evaluated the agreement of electrodiagnostic study severity, clinical assessment scores, and probability of carpal tunnel syndrome [Six-Item Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Evaluation Tool (CTS-6) scores. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 609 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (941 hands). Data were collected from nine hand surgery practices in the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality in Surgery. Goodman and Kruskal gamma statistics (γ) measured the agreement between electrodiagnostic studies and clinical assessment scores and between electrodiagnostic studies and CTS-6 scores. The authors performed cumulative logistic regression with mixed effects to evaluate the association among electrodiagnostic study severity, clinical assessments, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The concordance between electrodiagnostic study severity and CTS-6 scores was γ = 0.31 (95 percent CI, 0.21 to 0.40), with an accuracy of 43 percent. The concordance between electrodiagnostic study severity and clinical assessment scores was γ = 0.66 (95 percent CI, 0.58 to 0.74), with an accuracy of 58 percent. Wide site-level variation in the γ coefficient between electrodiagnostic studies and clinical assessment scores and between electrodiagnostic studies and CTS-6 was seen. Male sex, increasing age, and increasing body mass index were significantly associated with increased odds of electrodiagnostic study severity. CONCLUSIONS: Wide practice-level variation underscores the variability in diagnostic testing accuracy. Physicians should consider patient characteristics (e.g., sex, age, body mass index) when assessing carpal tunnel syndrome severity. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, II.

Nonsurgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Survey of Hand Surgeons.

Background: The nonsurgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) consists of multiple modalities: splinting, corticosteroid injections, hand therapy, and oral medications. However, data supporting the effectiveness of these different modalities are varied, thus creating controversy regarding the optimal nonsurgical treatment. It is unknown how current hand surgeons utilize nonsurgical treatments for CTS. Methods: An anonymous web-based survey was sent to 3289 members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand to assess nonsurgical treatment patterns for CTS. We pretested the survey using expert survey and content review and cognitively tested the survey for readability and understandability. Results: We analyzed surveys from 770 hand surgeons. Of the respondents, 41.2% of respondents recommend steroid injections for the treatment of CTS, 81.3% of respondents do not believe that oral steroids are beneficial for the treatment of CTS, and 3.6% of respondents typically prescribe gabapentinoids for the treatment of CTS. In total, 561 (72.9%) respondents always, usually, or sometimes encounter patients with more than two steroid injections for CTS before hand surgeon evaluation. Conclusions: There is variation in the use of nonsurgical modalities for the treatment of CTS among American Society for Surgery of the Hand members. However, patients do not obtain long-term benefit from multiple steroid injections and gabapentinoids for the treatment of CTS, highlighting the importance of dissemination of evidence-based nonsurgical management of CTS. Collectively, these findings underscore the importance of providing clear guidelines as to which patients benefit most from nonsurgical treatments.

Dissemination of Plastic Surgery Research: An Analysis of PRS and PRS-GO.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) recently developed an open access counterpart, PRS Global Open (PRS-GO), to increase dissemination of research in an efficient and widespread manner. We aimed to (1) examine the differences in the dissemination of research published in PRS and PRS-GO, and (2) identify differences in the authorship between the journals. Methods: We extracted data on Altmetric Attention Scores, article mentions, citations, and author characteristics using the Altmetric Explorer Database from January 1, 2018, to January 1, 2020. We stratified research outputs into traditional dissemination and social media dissemination. Additionally, multivariable linear regression models were used to examine differences in dissemination between the journals. Results: A total of 1798 articles were included in the analysis (PRS = 1031, PRS-GO = 767). The average Altmetric Attention Score was higher for PRS compared with PRS-GO (PRS = 15.2, PRS-GO = 8.1). Articles in PRS had a greater Altmetric Attention Score (ß-coefficient: 7.50, P < 0.001), higher measures of traditional dissemination (ß-coefficient: 3.11, P < 0.001), and higher measures of social media dissemination than articles in PRS-GO (ß-coefficient: 4.38, P = 0.73). Conclusions: Despite being an open access journal, PRS-GO had significantly fewer measures of social media and traditional dissemination compared with PRS. Given that numerous factors may influence the dissemination of scientific literature, it is imperative that publications identify specific ways to provide a fair advantage for both researchers and readers. Additional initiatives to engage readership for open access may include creative campaigns targeting an appropriate audience.

Utilization of Diagnostic Testing for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Survey of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.

PURPOSE: In 2016, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) changed the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, relaxing the recommendation for electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) prior to offering surgery. However, it is unknown how the updated guidelines changed the practice patterns of hand surgeons. METHODS: A web-based multiple-choice survey was sent to the members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. We assessed the current diagnostic practice patterns of hand surgeons. The survey was pretested using expert review with content and survey methodology experts and cognitively tested to ensure readability and understandability. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 770 hand surgeons. Approximately 26% of respondents required EDS prior to seeing a patient in consultation, and 56% of members routinely ordered EDS after evaluating a patient with carpal tunnel syndrome if testing was not performed prior to evaluation. The top reasons for obtaining EDS were to provide additional information for unclear diagnoses (97% selected), for patients with worker's compensation (82% selected), for grading the severity (73% selected), and to provide a baseline examination in the event of persistent symptoms (72% selected). However, only 38% of respondents believed that the current AAOS CPGs were appropriate, and 43% of respondents did not know what the guidelines recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the change in AAOS CPGs, EDS continues to be ubiquitously used for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of hand surgeons are unaware of the recommendations for EDS within the AAOS CPGs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings highlight the importance of explicitly defining which patients and which clinical scenarios would benefit from additional diagnostic testing and identifying strategies for more widespread dissemination of guidelines.

Task-Specific Patient Preferences for Shared Decision-Making in Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making for surgery can increase patient engagement, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes. However, the level of involvement that patients desire at each step of the decision-making process is unknown. METHODS: The authors surveyed patients at an academic hand surgery clinic to examine the preferred role in decision-making using validated questionnaires (i.e., Control Preference Scale, Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale, and General Self-Efficacy Scale). The Control Preference Scale assesses general treatment preferences, whereas the Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale distinguishes between problem-solving tasks (e.g., making diagnoses, calculating risks/benefits) and decision-making tasks. Patients' self-beliefs and perceived ability to handle difficult situations were assessed with the General Self-Efficacy Scale. The authors used linear regression models and ordinal logistic regression to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and patients' preferred role in treatment decision-making. RESULTS: Patients overall preferred an equal share of decision-making responsibility with the surgeon (mean Control Preference Scale score, 3.3 ± 0.7). Specifically, for problem-solving tasks, however, 81 percent of patients wanted to "hand over" the responsibility and 19 percent preferred shared decision-making. In contrast, for decision-making tasks, 54 percent of patients preferred shared decision-making. Each point increase in General Self-Efficacy Scale score correlated with 12 percent greater odds of preferring to retain the responsibility (OR, 1.12; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.21; p = 0.001). However, self-efficacy did not show a significant effect for problem-solving tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that patients prefer surgeons to provide expert knowledge for problem-solving tasks but desire equal share of responsibility in decision-making tasks. The authors' findings support the current shift away from the paternalistic model of surgical decision-making, and provide an effective strategy to tailor shared decision-making to align care delivery with patient preferences.

Trust and Distrust in Opioid Decision-Making: A Qualitative Assessment of Patient-Doctor Relationship.

PURPOSE: Surgeons often prescribe opioid analgesics for pain management after surgery. However, we understand little about how patients perceive opioid prescribing and make decisions to use opioids for postoperative pain management. In this study, we aimed to gain an understanding of patients' decision-making process on postoperative opioid use. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 adult patients undergoing elective surgery at our institution. The interviews were content-coded for thematic analysis. We used trust in the medical setting as a conceptual framework to interpret and find the inherent theory in the data. RESULTS: We found that participants based their opioid decisions on their trust or distrust toward various elements of their postoperative pain management. Participants believed that the surgeons "know," thereby, reinforcing their trust in surgeons' postoperative opioid prescribing to be in the participants' best interest. Moreover, the positive reputation of the institution strengthened the participants' trust. However, participants conveyed nuanced trust because of their distrust toward the opioid medications themselves, which were viewed as "suspicious," and the pharmaceutical companies, that were "despised." Despite this distrust, participants had confidence in their inherent ability to protect themselves from opioid use disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how patients perceive and form decisions on postoperative opioid use based on their trust and distrust toward various factors involved in their care highlights the importance of the patient-doctor relationship and building trust to effectively address postoperative pain and reduce opioid-related harms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Through a strengthened therapeutic alliance between patients and surgeons, we can improve our strategies to overcome the ongoing opioid epidemic through patient-centered approaches.

Evaluation of Factors Relevant to Pain Control Among Patients After Surgical Treatment.

Importance: Opioids are often prescribed after elective surgical treatment despite the potential for misuse. Although various pain control regimens exist, patient preferences for acute postoperative pain management are unknown. Objective: To describe patient-reported key attributes of postoperative pain management. Design, Setting, and Participants: This decision analytical model used responses from a survey based on conjoint analysis to investigate the value patients placed on different aspects of postoperative pain management. Participants were patients aged 18 years or older who underwent elective hand surgical procedures between July 1, 2018, and July 23, 2019, at a single academic center. The survey was completed on a web-based platform and took place between November 2019 and January 2020. Data were analyzed from May through July 2021. Exposures: Participants were presented with a series of discrete-choice tasks and asked to select between 2 postoperative medication options that changed from question to question and had varying characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Attribute importance scores and part-worth utility values for the queried aspects of pain control were calculated. Results: Of 710 individuals invited, 321 (45.2%) completed the survey; there were 212 (66.0%) women and 108 (33.6%) men, and the most common age category was 60 to 69 years (102 participants [31.8%]). Most patients reported previous opioid use (282 individuals [87.9%]). Factors in the decision-making process with the highest attribute importance scores (SDs) were risk of addiction (26.3% [13.0%]) and amount of pain relief (25.6% [14.6%]). Adverse effects 13.9% (7.2%), functional independence 11.8% (7.3%), and level of trust in the prescriber 11.4% (5.8%) had intermediate attribute importance scores (SDs). Cost 7.9% (4.4%) and stigma 3.1% (1.3%) had the lowest attribute importance scores (SDs) in patient decisions. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that multimodal pain control regimens that are associated with optimized pain relief and minimized risk of addiction are preferable to treat acute postoperative pain. The results suggest that identifying procedures for which patients prioritize minimizing risk of addiction over pain relief and incorporating patient preferences into decision-making may be associated with decreased postoperative opioid prescribing.

Opioid Prescribing after Carpal Tunnel Release: Analysis from the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality in Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the national practice patterns for postoperative opioid prescribing after carpal tunnel release, which is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. The authors sought to assess the rate of opioid prescribing after carpal tunnel release and patient-, surgeon-, and practice-level predictors of opioid prescriptions after surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted a cohort study from the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality in Surgery, a national consortium of nine practices with 33 surgeons who prospectively collect data for the purpose of quality improvement. Patients were included who underwent carpal tunnel release between July 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine practice and surgeon variation in postoperative opioid prescribing related to patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 648 patients with 792 operative hands, 52.9 percent were prescribed a postoperative opioid. After controlling for patient, surgeon, and practice characteristics, endoscopic carpal tunnel releases were associated with a decreased odds of receiving a postoperative opioid prescription compared to open carpal tunnel releases (OR, 0.19; 95 percent CI, 0.07 to 0.52). However, 57.4 percent of the variation in opioid prescribing was explained at the practice level, and 4.1 percent of the variation was explained at the surgeon level. CONCLUSIONS: Practice-level prescribing patterns play a substantial role in opioid prescribing. National efforts should consider development of evidence-based opioid prescribing recommendations for carpal tunnel release that target all prescribers, including trainees and advanced practice providers. In addition, endoscopic carpal tunnel release may offer an opportunity to minimize opioid prescribing. The authors recommend that providers encourage the use of nonopioid analgesia and limit opioid prescriptions after carpal tunnel release. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Perceived versus Patient-Reported Significance of Surgeon Gender in Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Previous investigators demonstrated that female patients often prefer female providers. However, these studies have not determined whether there are gender preferences for breast reconstruction surgeons or whether the effects of surgeon gender impacts patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Adult women were crowdsourced using Amazon Mechanical Turk to characterize societal preferences for the gender of breast and plastic surgeons in a hypothetical scenario. The authors also used data from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium to determine the association between surgeon gender and patient satisfaction after breast reconstruction. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient-reported outcomes at 3 months and 2 years following reconstruction. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the effects of surgeon gender on patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 1413 surveys were collected. Forty-two percent preferred female plastic surgeons, 5 percent preferred male surgeons, and 53 percent reported no preference. The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium analysis included 2236 patients of 55 male and nine female plastic surgeons. In this cohort, 1921 patients (82.2 percent) had male surgeons, whereas 415 patients (17.8 percent) had female surgeons. Regression analysis at 2 years revealed no differences in satisfaction with surgeon, outcome, or psychosocial well-being. Only satisfaction with information differed, as patients of female surgeons reported greater satisfaction in this category, with an adjusted mean difference of 2.82 (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Although nonpatient women hypothetically prefer female providers, surgeon gender makes little difference in actual patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. More investigation is needed to determine whether the difference in information delivery is clinically significant and whether it reflects variations in practices between male and female surgeons. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

An Assessment Tool for Hand Surgical Education Needs and Capacity in Resource-Limited Settings.

BACKGROUND: Hand surgeons have the potential to substantially decrease the surgical disability burden in the developing world through educator trips. The Lancet Commission supports contextually driven educator trips grounded in the needs of local hosts, yet few organizations perform a comprehensive assessment of learning interests or the hosting institutions' surgical capacity before the trips. METHODS: The authors adapted the Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment, and Supplies questionnaire, which was modified from the World Health Organization's validated Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care. The authors revised each aspect of the questionnaire to reflect items pertinent to upper extremity surgery and hand trauma care. They added sections to gauge self-identified learning needs, local disease burden, operative resources, and current practices. The tool was distributed by means of Qualtrics; descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. The authors analyzed the data for all participants and performed two subgroup analyses to examine variation by regions and countries. RESULTS: The authors received 338 responses from 27 countries. There was wide variability in local surgical disease burden, learning interests, and skill level of upper extremity procedures. Although learners were most interested in learning tendon transfers and microsurgical techniques, the majority did not have adequate infrastructure at their institution to sustain capacity for microvascular procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Needs assessments can gauge how best to provide education during short-term visiting educator trips and optimize its impact in resource-limited settings. Understanding the needs, learning interests, and availability of resources of local learners is imperative to creating a sustainable global surgical workforce.

The Impact of Community Care Referral on Time to Surgery for Veterans With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) enacted policies offering Veterans care in the community, aiming to improve access challenges. However, the impact of receipt of community care on wait times for Veterans receiving surgical care is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To compare wait times for surgery for Veterans with carpal tunnel syndrome who receive VA care plus community care (mixed care) and those who receive care solely within the VA (VA-only). RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Veterans undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2016. MEASURES: Our primary outcome was time from primary care physician (PCP) referral to CTR. RESULTS: Of the 29,242 Veterans undergoing CTR, 23,330 (79.8%) received VA-only care and 5912 (20.1%) received mixed care. Veterans receiving mixed care had significantly longer time from PCP referral to CTR (median mixed care: 378 days; median VA-only care: 176 days, P<0.001). After controlling for patient and facility covariates, mixed care was associated with a 37% increased time from PCP referral to CTR (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.65). Each additional service provided in the community was associated with a 23% increase in time to surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: VA-only care was associated with a shorter time to surgery compared with mixed care. Moreover, there were additional delays for each service received in the community. With likely increases in Veterans seeking community care, strategies must be used to identify and mitigate sources of delay through the spectrum of care between referral and definitive treatment.

Surgical Timing for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Comparison of Health Care Delivery in the Veterans Administration and Private Sector.

PURPOSE: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system monitors time from referral to specialist visit. We compared wait times for carpal tunnel release (CTR) at a VA hospital and its academic affiliate. METHODS: We selected patients who underwent CTR at a VA hospital and its academic affiliate (AA) (2010-2015). We analyzed time from primary care physician (PCP) referral to CTR, which was subdivided into PCP referral to surgical consultation and surgical consultation to CTR. Electrodiagnostic testing (EDS) was categorized in relation to surgical consultation (prereferral vs postreferral). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between clinical variables and surgical location. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2015, VA patients had a shorter median time from PCP referral to CTR (VA: 168 days; AA: 410 days), shorter time from PCP referral to surgical consultation (VA: 43 days; AA: 191 days), but longer time from surgical consultation to CTR (VA: 98 days; AA: 55 days). Using multivariable models, the VA was associated with a 35% shorter time to CTR (AA hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.82) and 75% shorter time to surgical consultation (AA HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20-0.03). Receiving both prereferral and postreferral EDS was associated with almost a 2-fold prolonged time to CTR (AA HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The VA was associated with shorter overall time to CTR compared with its AA. However, the VA policy of prioritizing time from referral to surgical consultation may not optimally incentivize time to surgery. Repeat EDS was associated with longer wait times in both systems. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given differences in where delays occur in each health care system, initiatives to improve efficiency will require targeting the appropriate sources of preoperative delay. Judicious use of EDS may be one avenue to decrease wait times in both systems.

A Qualitative Study of Patient Protection against Postoperative Opioid Addiction: A Thematic Analysis of Self-Agency.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are commonly used following outpatient surgery. However, we understand little about patients' perspectives and how patients decide on postoperative opioid use. This study seeks to investigate aspects of patients' thought processes that most impact their decisions. METHODS: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with 30 adults undergoing minor elective hand surgery at one tertiary hospital. Narratives were content-coded to arrive at the authors' thematic analysis. The authors incorporated Bandura's concept of self-agency to interpret the data and develop a conceptual framework that best explained the implicit theory within participants' responses. RESULTS: The authors found six themes under two domains of self-agency. Participants actively sought out protective mechanisms supporting their decision on opioid use, but sometimes did so unconsciously. They would avoid opioids postoperatively because they were "tough" and wanted to evade the risk of addiction as "good citizens." They conveyed a nuanced safety against addiction because they were "not the kind" to become addicted and because they trusted the surgeons' prescribing. However, participants felt discouraged by the stigma associated with opioids. Both intentionally and unintentionally, participants integrated a strong sense of self in their decision-making processes. CONCLUSIONS: A robust understanding of how patients choose to take opioids for postoperative pain control is imperative to develop patient-centered strategies to treat the opioid epidemic. Effective opioid-reduction policies should consider patients as active agents who negotiate various internal and external influences in their decision-making processes. Surgeons must incorporate patients' individual goals and perspectives regarding postoperative opioid use to minimize opioid-related harm after surgery.