Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 30(15): e1033-e1042, 2022 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35333815

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Unstable fractures in sick or elderly patients are on the rise. These patients who are at high risk for surgery present a challenge for surgeons and anesthesiologists. In patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores 3 to 4, the risk is even higher because of the high rate of intraoperative complications. METHODS: All patients with ASA scores 3 to 4 who presented with unstable fractures of the spine to a level-one trauma center were assessed, and they underwent awake spinal percutaneous fixation, with mild sedation and local anesthesia. Demographics, radiology, and the outcome were collected. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were operated between the years 2019 and 2021. Average follow-up was 12 months (range 8 to 24 months); six patients were female and 13 males. The average age was 77.7 years; the ASA score was 3 to 4 in all patients. There were 10 extension-type injuries, six unstable burst injuries, two chance fractures, and one teardrop fracture. All patients underwent unilateral fixation, and just one patient underwent bilateral fixation; cement augmentation was done in 16 of the patients. No neurologic complication was observed. One case of infection presented 4 months after surgery. All patients were discharged ambulating. CONCLUSIONS: Awake fixation in extreme cases is safe and feasible; a dedicated team including an anesthesiologist and radiologist is needed to treat these cases safely and quickly.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Spinal Fractures , Aged , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Wakefulness
2.
J Anesth Analg Crit Care ; 2(1): 52, 2022 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37386609

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intellectually disabled (ID) patients present unique therapeutic challenges. We aimed to describe the characteristics of ID patients admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing critically ill adult ID patients to matched patients without ID (1:2 ratio) in a single ICU (2010-2020). The main outcome measure was mortality. Secondary outcomes included complications during admission and characteristics of weaning from mechanical ventilation. The study and control groups were randomly selected based on similar age and sex. ID patients nonetheless had an average APACHE score of 18.5 ± 8.7 vs. 13.4 ± 8.5 in controls (p < 0.001). ID patients had more hematological (p = 0.04), endocrinological (p < 0.001) and neurological (p = 0.004) comorbidities and used more psychiatric medication before admission. No difference was found in mortality rates. Differences were found as there were more secondary complications, such as pulmonary and sepsis (p < 0.03), frequent requirement of vasopressors (p = 0.001), significantly higher intubation rates with more weaning attempts, tracheostomies and longer ICU and hospital admissions (p < 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill adult ID may have more comorbidities and be sicker at the time of admission compared to their age- and sex-matched counterparts. They require more supportive treatment and their weaning from mechanical ventilation may be more challenging.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...