Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(12): 1395-1397, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36179909

ABSTRACT

Through survey-led interviews, health care staff recognizes that patients have different bathing techniques and need more education on chlorhexidine gluconate cleansing. Preliminary findings gathered will be used to develop and test electronic competency-based tools to ensure patients are provided with the same comprehensive instructions before using chlorhexidine gluconate bathing products.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Humans , Chlorhexidine , Baths/methods , Skin , Hygiene , Delivery of Health Care , Preoperative Care/methods , Surgical Wound Infection
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(3): 274-279, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32993827

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The hands of healthcare personnel are the most important source for transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens. The role of contaminated fomites such as portable equipment, stethoscopes, and clothing of personnel in pathogen transmission is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To study routes of transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA markers from 31 source patients and from environmental surfaces in their rooms. DESIGN: A 3-month observational cohort study. SETTING: A Veterans' Affairs hospital. METHODS: After providing care for source patients, healthcare personnel were observed during interactions with subsequent patients. Putative routes of transmission were identified based on recovery of DNA markers from sites of contact with the patient or environment. To assess plausibility of fomite-mediated transmission, we assessed the frequency of transfer of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from the skin of 25 colonized patients via gloved hands versus fomites. RESULTS: Of 145 interactions involving contact with patients and/or the environment, 41 (28.3%) resulted in transfer of 1 or both DNA markers to the patient and/or the environment. The DNA marker applied to patients' skin and clothing was transferred most frequently by stethoscopes, hands, and portable equipment, whereas the marker applied to environmental surfaces was transferred only by hands and clothing. The percentages of MRSA transfer from the skin of colonized patients via gloved hands, stethoscope diaphragms, and clothing were 52%, 40%, and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fomites such as stethoscopes, clothing, and portable equipment may be underappreciated sources of pathogen transmission. Simple interventions such as decontamination of fomites between patients could reduce the risk for transmission.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Biomarkers , DNA, Viral/genetics , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...