Eliminating Hands-Off Handoffs: Improvement in Perioperative Handoff Communication With a Multidisciplinary Tool Initiative.

INTRODUCTION: Handoffs between the operating room (OR) and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) require a high volume and quality of information to be transferred. This study aimed to improve perioperative communication with a handoff tool. METHODS: Perioperative staff at a quaternary care center was surveyed regarding perception of handoff quality, and OR to PACU handoffs were observed for structured criteria. A 25-item tool was implemented, and handoffs were similarly observed. Staff was then again surveyed. A multidisciplinary team led this initiative as a collaboration. RESULTS: After implementation, nursing reported improved perception of time spent (2.63-3.68, p = .02) and amount of information discussed (2.85-3.73, p = .05). Anesthesia also reported improved personal communication (3.69-4.43, p = .004), effectiveness of handoffs (3.43-3.82, p = .02), and amount of information discussed (4.26-4.76, p = .05). After implementation, observed patient information discussed during handoffs increased for both surgical and anesthesia team members. The frequency of complete and near-complete handoffs increased (40%-74%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A structured handoff tool increased the amount of essential information reported during handoffs between the OR and PACU and increased team members' perception of handoffs.

Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment and Reporting in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Demographic Comparison to the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Cancer care guidelines based on clinical trial data in homogenous populations may not be applicable to all rectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients enrolled in rectal cancer clinical trials (CTs) are representative of United States (U.S.) rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Prospective rectal cancer CTs from 2010 to 2019 in the United States were systematically reviewed. In trials with multiple arms reporting separate demographic variables, each arm was considered a separate CT group in the analysis. Demographic variables considered in the analysis were age, sex, race/ethnicity, facility location throughout the United States, rural vs urban geography, and facility type. Participant demographics from trial and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) participants were compared using chi-squared goodness of fit and one-sample t-test where applicable. RESULTS: Of 50 CT groups identified, 42 (82%) studies reported mean or median age. Trial participants were younger compared to NCDB patients (P < .001 all studies). All but three trials had fewer female patients than NCDB (48.2% female, P < .001). Less than half the CT groups reported on race or ethnicity. Eighteen out of 22 trials (82%) had a smaller percentage of Black patients and 4 out of 8 (50%) trials had fewer Hispanic or Spanish origin patients than the NCDB. No CTs reported comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, or education. CT primary sites were largely at academic centers and in urban areas. CONCLUSION: The present study supports the need for improved demographic representation and transparency in rectal cancer clinical trials.

Sarcopenia in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma: An Opportunity for Preoperative Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia, defined as low skeletal muscle mass, affects up to 60% of rectal adenocarcinoma patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT), with negative impact on patient outcomes. Identifying modifiable risk factors may decrease morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review of rectal cancer patients from a single academic center from 2006 to 2020 was performed. Sixty-nine patients with pre- and post-NACRT CT imaging were included. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated as total L3 skeletal muscle divided by height squared. Sarcopenia thresholds were 52.4 cm2/m2 for men and 38.5 cm2/m2 for women. Student T-test, chi-square test, multivariable regression, and multivariable Cox hazard analysis were performed. RESULTS: 62.3% of patients lost SMI from pre- to post-NACRT imaging, with a mean change of -7.8% (±19.9%). Eleven (15.9%) patients were sarcopenic at presentation, increasing to 20 (29.0%) following NACRT. Mean SMI decreased from 49.0 cm2/m2 (95% CI: 42.0 cm2/m2-56.0 cm2/m2) to 38.2 cm2/m2 (95% CI: 33.6 cm2/m2-42.9 cm2/m2) (P = .003). Pre-NACRT sarcopenia correlated with post-NACRT sarcopenia (OR 20.6, P = .002). Percent decrease in SMI was associated with a 5% increased mortality risk. CONCLUSION: The presence of sarcopenia at diagnosis and its association with post-NACRT sarcopenia suggests an opportunity for a high-impact intervention.

Could meeting the standards of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database improve patient outcomes?

AIM: The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) was developed to improve rectal cancer patient outcomes in the United States. The NAPRC consists of a set of process and outcome measures that hospitals must meet in order to be accredited. We aimed to assess the potential of the NAPRC by determining whether achievement of the process measures correlates with improved survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients undergoing curative proctectomy for non-metastatic rectal cancer from 2010 to 2014. NAPRC process measures identified in the National Cancer Database included clinical staging completion, treatment starting <60 days from diagnosis, carcinoembryonic antigen level measured prior to treatment, tumour regression grading and margin assessment. RESULTS: There were 48 669 patients identified with a mean age of 62 ± 12.9 years and 61.3% of patients were men. The process measure completed most often was assessment of proximal and distal margins (98.4%) and the measure completed least often was the serum carcinoembryonic antigen level prior to treatment (63.8%). All six process measures were completed in 23.6% of patients. After controlling for age, gender, comorbidities, annual facility resection volume, race and pathological stage, completion of all process measures was associated with a statistically significant mortality decrease (Cox hazard ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.94, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Participating institutions provided complete datasets for all six process measures in less than a quarter of patients. Compliance with all process measures was associated with a significant mortality reduction. Improved adoption of NAPRC process measures could therefore result in improved survival rates for rectal cancer in the United States.

Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome Presenting as Non-Specific Colitis: A Medical Diagnosis with a Surgical Presentation.

A 20-year-old woman with previous COVID-19 diagnosis presented with abdominal pain and colitis on CT scan. She was admitted in septic shock, with etiology of colitis unclear. After resuscitation, antibiotics, and steroids, she clinically deteriorated. Worsening Clostridioides difficile infection was most likely and she was taken to the operating room. Intraoperatively, only a segment of transverse colon appeared abnormal on gross and endoscopic evaluation. Total colectomy was deferred in favor of segmental resection. Given her unusual disease pattern and recent COVID-19 infection, diagnosis of MIS-C was considered. Steroids were continued and treatment broadened to include heparin and IVIG. The patient returned to the operating room for planned reexploration, endoscopy, and end colostomy. On hospital day three, the patient had an acute mental status change. Computed tomography demonstrated acute cerebral edema with brainstem herniation. The family chose comfort-care measures. Final pathology from the transverse colon demonstrated COVID-19-associated vasculitis.

Not All Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Benefit From Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: While neoadjuvant combined modality therapy (NA-CMT) is beneficial for most patients with locally advanced rectal cancer some patients may experience disease progression during treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify characteristics associated with progression during NA-CMT. METHODS: A single institution retrospective review of patients with stage II-III rectal cancer receiving NA-CMT was conducted from 2008-2019. Patients with incomplete or unknown NA-CMT treatment and those who received chemotherapy in addition to NA-CMT were excluded. Initial staging MRI was compared to post-operative pathology to determine progression. Definitions: responders (complete response or regression) and non-responders (stable disease or progression). RESULTS: 156 patients were included: 25 (16.1%) complete responders, 79 (50.6%) had evidence of regression, 34 (21.8%) were stable non-responders, and 18 (11.5%) were progressors. Those who progressed had worse overall survival. Factors associated with non-responders included black race (OR 4.5, 95% CI: 1.10-18.7) and increasing distance from the anal verge (OR 1.2, 95% CI: .2-2.9). Distance from the anal verge was determined via MRI. Recurrence was significantly more common among non-responders (15, 30.61%) when compared to responders (14, 13.46%), P = .012. CONCLUSION: Patients who progress despite NA-CMT have overall worse survival compared to patients who do respond. While this study failed to identify modifiable or predictive risk factors for progression, the multivariate logistic regression model suggests that race and tumor biology may play a role in progression. Future studies should focus on early identification of patients who may not benefit from NA-CMT in an effort to develop alternative treatment algorithms.

Functional Not Medical Frailty Is Associated With Long-Term Disability After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Frailty has been associated with increased morbidity after surgery. However, few studies investigate long-term functional outcomes. METHODS:  Patients ≥ 65 years old who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer were surveyed regarding their ability to perform activities of daily living, measured by Barthel Index, before and after surgery. Patients also reported time to return to their functional baseline. RESULTS: Pre-operative moderate dependency was associated with declining function at six months (OR: 8.8; CI: 1.8-42.6) and one year post-operatively (OR: 17.5; CI: 2.8-109.8). Pre-operative functional frailty was associated with subjective failure to return to baseline (OR: 4.8 and 4.2) for slightly and moderately dependent patients and a longer time to return to baseline. Medical frailty, based on the modified Frailty Index, was not significantly associated with failure to return to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of functional frailty are better predictors of failure to return to baseline, than measures of medical frailty.

General Surgery Residents' Retention of Knowledge After an Anorectal Skills Workshop.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have demonstrated suboptimal resident exposure to anorectal pathology. A workshop was developed at an academic general surgery residency. This study assesses durability of learning from the workshop. METHODS: Thirty-six residents participated in a skills laboratory addressing diagnosis and management of anorectal complaints. The skills laboratory was broken into didactic and hand-on skills stations. Residents completed pre-, post- and 6-mo after workshop assessments to evaluate knowledge and confidence. Knowledge and confidence-based scores pre-, post- and 6-mo after workshop were compared. RESULTS: Scores demonstrated retention of information. Knowledge-based question median scores improved from 63.2% pre-workshop to 73.7% post-workshop and 76.3% at 6 mo (P = 0.0005). Median confidence scores improved from 31 pre-workshop to 40 post-workshop, and were stable at 6 mo (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge and confidence gained from an anorectal skills workshop was stable or improved at 6 mo. These results suggest that an anorectal curriculum is effective at improving general surgery resident background knowledge and confidence when managing anorectal complaints.

Effects of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes in early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-weighted cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials have been unable to demonstrate noninferiority of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess oncologic resection success, short- and long-term morbidity, and overall survival by operative approach in a homogenous early-stage rectal cancer cohort. METHODS: This is a multicenter, propensity score-weighted cohort study utilizing deidentified data from the National Cancer Database. Individuals who underwent a formal proctectomy for early-stage rectal cancer (T1-2, N0, M0) from 2010 to 2015 were included. The primary outcome was a composite variable indicating successful oncologic resection stratified by operative approach, defined as negative margins with at least 12 lymph nodes evaluated. RESULTS: Among 3649 proctectomies for rectal adenocarcinoma, 1660 (45%) were approached open, 1461 (40%) laparoscopically, and 528 (15%) robotically. After propensity score weighting, compared to open approach, there were no differences in odds of successful oncologic resection (ORadj = 1.07, 95% CI 0.9, 1.28 and ORadj = 1.28, 95% CI 0.97, 1.7). Open approach was associated with longer mean (± SD) length of stay compared to laparoscopic (7.7 ± 0.18 vs. 6.5 ± 0.25 days, p < 0.001) and robotic (7.7 ± 0.18 vs. 6.3 ± 0.35 days, p < 0.001) approaches. In regard to 90-day mortality, compared to open approach, laparoscopic (ORadj = 0.56, 95% CI 0.36, 0.88) and robotic (ORadj = 0.45, 95% CI 0.22, 0.94) approaches were associated with a reduced odd of 90-day mortality. This mortality benefit persists in the long-term for laparoscopic approach (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: For individuals with early-stage rectal cancer treated with proctectomy, successful oncologic resection can be achieved irrespective of technical approach. Minimally invasive approaches provide short-term reduction in morbidity. Surgical approach must be tailored to each patient based on surgeon experience and judgement in collaboration with a multi-disciplinary team.

Neoadjuvant radiation above NCCN guidelines for rectal cancer is associated with age under 50 and early clinical stage.

INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest patients with early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) receive neoadjuvant radiation above recommended doses without oncologic benefit. The use of excessive radiation may lead to worse outcomes and patient harm. We sought to evaluate predictors of aggressive neoadjuvant radiation (A-XRT) use in EORC patients and compare this to late-onset rectal cancer (LORC) patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014 was queried for rectal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing surgical resection. Patients with stage 0 or IV disease, positive margins, and incomplete data were excluded. Standard neoadjuvant radiation (S-XRT) was based upon NCCN guidelines: 25-50.4 Gray for stage II/III patients and none for stage I. Excess radiation was considered A-XRT. Patients diagnosed at age < 50 years were labeled EORC; those ≥ 50 years were LORC. Categorical data were analyzed with chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to analyze clinicodemographic associations with A-XRT. RESULTS: 45,403 patients were included: 7999 (17.6%) EORC and 37,404 (82.4%) LORC. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that A-XRT use among stage I patient was associated with male gender, age under 50, urban location, mucinous histology, and poor tumor differentiation. Among stage II and III patients, A-XRT use was associated with male gender, age under 50, higher education and income, and urban location. Cox hazards did not demonstrate a significant association of A-XRT use with survival. CONCLUSION: Our data reaffirm that EORC patients more frequently receive A-XRT and that use is based on demographic features independent of tumor characteristics. Reasons for A-XRT, particularly in EORC patients, should be clarified to promote adherence to guidelines and minimize patient harm.

Predictors of curative-intent oncologic management among patients with stage IV rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Management of stage IV rectal adenocarcinoma is categorized into curative and palliative-intent strategies. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of and associations with curative-intent treatment in stage IV rectal cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016 was queried for patients with stage IV rectal adenocarcinoma and were grouped into curative-intent and non-curative management. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict use of curative-intent management. RESULTS: 16,862 patients were included in this study: 4886 (30.0%) curative-intent and 11,975 (71.0%) non-curative. Multivariable regression demonstrated curative intent was associated with young age, female gender, white race, private insurance, mucinous histology and anaplastic grade. CONCLUSION: Use of curative intent oncologic management among patients with stage IV rectal adenocarcinoma is influenced by age, tumor biology and location of metastatic disease. Association with gender and insurance imply the presence of disparity in the delivery of cancer care among this patient population.

A comparison of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend open adrenalectomy for most resectable adrenal malignancies, minimally invasive adrenalectomies are performed. Robotic adrenalectomies have become more popular recently, but there is a paucity of literature comparing laparoscopic and robotic resections. METHODS: Patients who underwent a planned minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenal malignancies (adrenocortical carcinoma, malignant pheochromocytoma, other carcinoma) were identified in the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was the conversion rate from minimally invasive to open. Other post-operative outcomes and survival were compared. RESULTS: 416 patients (76.5%) underwent a laparoscopic adrenalectomy and 128 (23.5%) underwent a robotic operation. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar. Approximately 19% of tumors resected by a minimally invasive approach were > 10 cm. The intra-operative conversion rate was decreased among robotic adrenalectomies relative to laparoscopic on univariate (7.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.005) and multivariable (odds ratio 0.39, p = 0.01) analyses. Using marginal standardization, there was a stepwise increase in the conversion rate as tumor size increased (< 5, 5-10, > 10 cm) for laparoscopic (7.5%, 18.0%, 33.2%) and robotic (3.1%, 8.3%, 17.3%) adrenalectomies. Operations which required conversion had a greater margin positivity rate, greater length of stay, and an association with poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: In contrast to most clinical guidelines, minimally invasive adrenalectomies are being performed on large malignant tumors. A laparoscopic approach was associated with a greater conversion rate and subsequent poor outcomes. If a surgeon is not planning an open adrenalectomy, but adrenal malignancy is a possibility, robotic adrenalectomy may be the preferred approach for resectable adrenal tumors.

Racial disparities in operative management of localized, non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in surgically fit patients.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend resection of non-functional neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas (NF-pNETs) that are ≥2 cm in size. We compared utilization of surgery based on race. METHODS: We identified non-Hispanic White and Black patients with localized NF-pNETs ≥2 cm and Charlson-Deyo score 0-1 in the NCDB (2004-2016). We compared utilization of surgery by race, adjusting for clinicodemographic variables. Overall survival was compared based on management. RESULTS: A total of 3459 patients were included (White = 3005; Black = 454). Black patients were younger (58vs63 years) and more often treated at academic facilities (65.3%vs60.3%). Overall, Black and White patients underwent surgery at similar rates (77.3%vs79.6%). When stratified by primary site, Black patients with body/tail tumors were less likely to undergo surgery (78.5%vs84.7%). On multivariable analysis, Black race was associated with a lower likelihood of surgery overall (OR 0.74,p = 0.034) and in patients with body/tail tumors (OR 0.56,p = 0.001). Non-operative management was associated with a higher risk of death (HR 3.19,p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a national cohort of patients with NF-pNETs meeting criteria for resection, Black race is associated with lower frequency of surgery. Operative intervention is associated with prolonged survival. Persistent racial disparities in management of a surgically curable disease should be targeted for improvement.

Medicare reimbursement for common general surgery procedures has declined over the last decade.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed reimbursement cuts for operations in 2021. Literature examining reimbursement for common operations is scarce. METHODS: Reimbursement rates were abstracted (2011-2021). Trends in reimbursement rates were analyzed using linear regression. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2021, the national inflation rate was 16.3%. Unadjusted reimbursement rates for open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs increased by 6.5% and 7.2%, respectively. There was an increase in unadjusted reimbursement for open appendectomies of 5.1% and 6.1% for laparoscopic. Unadjusted reimbursement for open cholecystectomies increased by 4.4%, but decreased by 6.8% for laparoscopic. When adjusted to 2021 values, reimbursement for all six operations decreased. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies experienced the largest decreases (19.8%, 10.2%). CONCLUSION: Since 2011, there have been decreases in adjusted reimbursement for three common operations, independent of operative approach. Awareness of trends in reimbursement rates should be a priority to ensure sustainable general surgical care.

Evaluation of Demographics and Management of Rectal Cancer by Age Group: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Background Data suggests there are demographic and biological differences in colon cancer between young and typical-onset patients. However, it is unclear if these differences persist in rectal cancer patients, exclusive of colon cancer. This is a retrospective review of a large national database to evaluate age-based differences in demographics, tumor features, and treatment among patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods The National Cancer Database from 2004-2014 was queried for rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were grouped by age at diagnosis: early-onset, defined as <40 years, mid-onset 40-49, and late-onset ≥50. Propensity matching controlled for demographic variation among cohorts. Pairwise Chi-square with Bonferroni correction was used for analysis. Results Thirty thousand nine hundred seventy-eight patients were included: 1,249 (4%) early-onset, 4,156 (13%) middle-onset, and 25,573 (83%) late-onset. Significant differences existed between all three cohorts in nearly all demographic and pathologic metrics. Control for demographic variation revealed early-onset and middle-onset cohorts differed only with respect to the stage at presentation, while early-onset and late-onset cohorts differed more significantly on the basis of stage, histology, and oncologic management. Conclusion The demographic differences observed demonstrate that patients under 50 should not be considered one cohort. Propensity matching led to a decrease in tumor trait differences among cohorts, suggesting that demographics other than age drive variation in tumor biology. Young patients received more aggressive management, implying the presence of an age bias. Age-based screening is likely insufficient and may exclude the rising proportion of young patients at risk for disease, while age-based management may lead to under- or overtreatment of patients at either end of the age spectrum.

Evaluating disparities in delivery of neoadjuvant guideline-based chemoradiation for rectal cancer: A multicenter, propensity score-weighted cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite guideline recommendations, some patients still receive care inappropriate for their clinical stage of disease. Identification of factors that contribute to variation in guideline base care may help eradicate disparities in the treatment of early and locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2015 was analyzed with propensity score weighting to identify factors associated with delivery and omission of neoadjuvant guideline-based chemoradiation (GBC) for those with early and locally advanced rectal cancer. RESULTS: Only 74% of patients with rectal cancer received stage-appropriate neoadjuvant chemoradiation; 4544 (88%) of those with early stage disease and 8675 (68%) in locally advanced disease. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not planned in 27% and 34% respectively, of those who did not receive GBC. Factors associated with receipt of non-guideline-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation were age >65 years, Medicare insurance, treatment at a community facility, West-South-Central geography, having locally advanced disease, and Charlson-Deyo score >3. Receipt of ideal guideline-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation conferred a survival benefit at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Patient and non-patient factors contribute to disparities in guideline-based delivery of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the treatment of rectal cancer. Identification of these risk factors are important to help standardize care and improve survival outcomes.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy guideline concordance in melanoma: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of treating facility type on guideline-concordant sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) management in T1a* (defined as a Breslow depth <0.76 mm without ulceration or mitoses) and T2/T3 melanoma. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2012 to 2016. RESULTS: Our cohort included 109,432 patients. For T1a* melanomas, 85% of patients received guideline-concordant SLNB management at community and academic facilities versus 75% of patients at integrated network facilities (p < .001). Over 83% of patients with T2/T3 melanoma treated at an academic facility received guideline-concordant SLNB management versus 77% treated at a community facility (p < .001). Adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, integrated (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 0.54), and comprehensive community (aOR = 0.74) facilities were less likely to provide guideline-concordant SLNB management in patients with T1a* melanoma compared to academic facilities. Community facilities (aOR = 0.72) were less likely to provide guideline-concordant SLNB management in patients with T2/T3 melanoma compared to academic facilities. CONCLUSION: Academic facilities provide the highest rate of guideline-concordant sentinel lymph node management. Comparatively, community programs may underutilize SLNB in T2/T3 disease, while integrated and comprehensive community facilities may over-utilize SLNB in T1a* disease.

Immunotherapy Is Associated with a Survival Benefit in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

Background: Immunotherapy (IT) has led to improved survival in several common cancers but success in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been limited. We analyzed if combination IT-chemotherapy (IT-CT) is associated with improved survival compared with chemotherapy alone (CT) in patients with metastatic PDAC. Methods: The National Cancer Database (2004-2016) was queried for patients who were diagnosed with metastatic PDAC. Patients were categorized by treatment group: CT only and IT-CT. Patients were excluded if they received radiation or a surgical procedure. The primary outcome was overall survival. Results: A total of 59,289 patients were identified, of whom 58,947 (99.4%) received CT and 342 (0.6%) received IT-CT. The IT-CT group was younger, had fewer comorbidities, and was more often treated at an academic center. The utilization of multiagent CT was similar between the groups. Median survival of patients treated with IT-CT was longer than CT alone (7.9 months vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.005). On multivariable analysis, receipt of IT-CT was associated with a survival advantage as compared with CT (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% confidence intervals 0.76-0.97) when adjusting for demographics and type of CT regimen. Conclusion: In patients with metastatic PDAC, it appears that combination IT-CT may perhaps be associated with a survival advantage compared with CT alone.

Effect of "Residents as Teachers" Workshop on Learner Perception of Trainee Teaching Skill.

BACKGROUND: Surgical residencies use variable structures for formal training in education. We hypothesized that a one-day workshop intervention would improve resident teaching ability measured by self-assessment and learner evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Faculty educators delivered a Residents as Teachers (RAT) workshop to general surgery residents on setting expectations, positive learning environment, difficult feedback and the 1-min preceptor model. For three months before and after the workshop, junior residents and medical students evaluated their supervising residents' teaching skill monthly using a Likert scale questionnaire. Pre- and postworkshop surveys were administered to resident participants to assess their knowledge of the material and teaching confidence. Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. This study was conducted at a tertiary academic center with a large surgical residency program. RESULTS: Thirty-nine PGY 1-5 residents participated in the Residents as Teachers workshop and were included in the study. Pre- and post- workshop survey results demonstrated significant improvements in participants' knowledge and teaching confidence. On monthly assessments of seniors by junior residents, significant improvements were noted in three domains. Medical student ratings did not reflect significant improvements in resident teaching skill. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study using learner evaluation of a comprehensive surgical RAT program. Despite a significant increase in surgery residents' self-assessment following participation in an education workshop, no improvement was seen in resident teaching skill as perceived by medical students.

Mortality and Survival Among Octogenarians with Localized Pancreatic Head Cancer: a National Cancer Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has historically poor outcomes. Difficult decisions must be made by patients and providers, especially in the elderly for whom treatment morbidities may not be tolerable. Herein, we report treatment-dependent outcomes of octogenarians with localized PDAC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database identified patients ≥60 years with localized PDAC of the pancreatic head (2011-2016). Patients were grouped by age (60-79 and ≥80 years) and categorized by treatment regimen: no treatment, chemotherapy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy with perioperative chemotherapy, or pancreaticoduodenectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative outcomes and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 35,409 patients were included, 8745 (24.7%) of which were ≥80 years. Over 52% of octogenarians did not receive any treatment, compared to 19.1% of younger patients (p<0.001). Patients ≥80 years who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy had a significantly greater 90-day mortality rate compared to patients 60-79 years (11.0% vs. 6.7%, p<0.001). Only 42.2% of octogenarians who underwent upfront pancreatectomy received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median survival for octogenarians was 3.3 months without any treatment, 9.7 months with chemotherapy, 12.0 months with pancreaticoduodenectomy, and greater than 20 months with either perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Age ≥80 was associated with poor survival relative to ages 60-79 when adjusting for treatment regimen (HR=1.19, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Increasing age is associated with worse overall survival in PDAC, but select octogenarians can achieve reasonable survival with multimodal therapy. Given the poor survival and increased perioperative mortality of octogenarians, patient selection for surgery and consideration of neoadjuvant therapy may be increasingly important.