Comparing Flap Advancement and Wound Coverage of Anterograde Homodigital Neurovascular Island Flap Designs: A Cadaveric Model.

PURPOSE: Anterograde homodigital neurovascular island flaps are a reconstructive option for volar fingertip injuries and confer the advantage of preserving fingertip sensation after surgery. However, the amount of flap advancement and wound coverage provided by stepwise and triangular flap designs remains unknown. This study sought to investigate how incremental proximal dissection of the pedicle influences flap advancement and whether advancement and/or coverage differ between the triangular and stepwise flap designs using 22 paired cadaveric digits. METHODS: Flap advancement and wound coverage were evaluated in a pairwise design such that each pair of digits received 1 stepwise flap and 1 triangular flap. After creating a standardized injury to the volar fingertip, pedicled flaps were dissected from the middle phalanx and advanced distally under consistent tension. Advancement was measured for each 5 mm of proximal mobilization of the pedicle to a maximum of 30 mm. RESULTS: On average, 2.6 ± 0.2 mm of flap advancement could be achieved for every 10 mm of pedicle mobilization. With 30 mm of proximal mobilization of the pedicle, 11.8 ± 2.8 mm of advancement and 57.2% ± 16.1% of wound coverage could be expected. There were no significant differences between the flap designs. CONCLUSIONS: The stepwise and triangular anterograde homodigital neurovascular island flaps offer comparable and consistent reconstructive outcomes for volar fingertip injuries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings in this study suggest that the choice of flap design need not be influenced by the considerations of advancement or coverage; rather, surgeon preference or technical differences between the 2 flap designs may be of more importance.

Comparison of Computed Tomography Articular Surface Geometry of Male Versus Female Thumb Carpometacarpal Joints.

BACKGROUND: Given the predilection of first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis in women compared with men, we aim to determine the differences in first CMC joint surface geometry and congruence between young healthy males and females. METHODS: Wrist computed tomographic scan data of 11 men and 11 women aged 20 to 35 years were imported into 3-dimensional software programs. The first metacarpal and the trapezium were aligned in a standardized position according to landmarks at key points on Gaussian and maximum curvature maps. Measurements of joint congruence and surface geometry were analyzed, including joint space volume, distance between the bones at the articular surface edges, area of the joint space, and radii of curvature in the radial-ulnar and volar-dorsal planes. RESULTS: The mean thumb CMC articular space volume was 104.02 ± 30.96 mm3 for females and 138.63 ± 50.36 mm3 for males. The mean first metacarpal articular surface area was 144.9 ± 10.9 mm2 for females and 175.4 ± 25.3 mm2 for males. After normalizing for size, the mean thumb CMC articular space volume was 119.4 ± 24.6 mm3 for females and 117.86 ± 28.5 mm3 for males. There was also no significant difference for the articular space volume, articular surface distances, articular space, and mean radii of curvatures. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that there are sex differences in the first CMC joint articular volume without normalizing for size; however, there are no sex differences in first CMC joint articular volume, curvature characteristics, or joint congruence of young, healthy patients after normalizing for joint size.

Primary orbital fracture repair: development and validation of tools for morphologic and functional analysis.

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a technique for objective quantitative evaluation of outcomes of orbital reconstruction. Facial three-dimensional images were captured using a Vectra three-dimensional camera. Morphometric analysis was based on interactive anthropometric identification. The analysis was applied to a population of healthy adults (n = 13) and a population of patients following primary repair of unilateral orbital fractures (n = 13). Morphologic results following reconstruction were evaluated by identifying residual asymmetries. All subjects further completed the Derriford Appearance Questionnaire and the Orbital Appearance and Function Questionnaire.Normative reference values for periorbital asymmetry were determined in a reference population. The mean asymmetry was less than 1.6 mm for each measured morphologic feature. In the trauma population, primary orbital reconstruction effectively restored normal periorbital symmetry in 16 of 20 measured parameters. The fracture population showed no significant differences in the degree of asymmetry in globe projection, lower eyelid position, or ciliary margin length.The overall DAS59 scores were significantly higher in the fracture population (P = 0.04). This was due to significantly higher physical distress and dysfunction scores (P = 0.02), as well as a trend toward higher general and social self-consciousness scores (P = 0.06). No significant difference in facial self-consciousness was noted (P = 0.21). Thus, although primary orbital reconstruction was effective in restoring periorbital morphology, patients still experienced a higher level of physical distress and dysfunction than their nontraumatized counterparts. This was in accordance with patient self-report, which indicated that a greater percentage of patients were significantly bothered by functional outcomes postoperatively as opposed to appearance.

A new system for severity scoring of facial fractures: development and validation.

Facial fractures are often the result of high-velocity trauma, causing skeletal disruption affecting multiple anatomic sites to varying degrees. Although several widely accepted classification systems exist, these are mostly region-specific and differ in the classification criteria used, making it impossible to uniformly and comprehensively document facial fracture patterns. Furthermore, a widely accepted system that is able to provide a final summary measure of fracture severity does not exist, making it difficult to investigate the epidemiologic data surrounding facial fracture severity. In this study, a comprehensive method for panfacial fracture documentation and severity measurement is proposed and validated through a retrospective analysis of 63 patients operated on for acute facial fracture. The severity scale was validated through statistical analysis of correlation with surrogate markers of severity (operating room procedure time and number of implants). Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated, and a statistically significant correlation was found between severity score and both number of implants and operating room procedure time (R = 0.92790 and R = 0.68157, respectively). Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess intrarater and interrater reliabilities of the severity scale and were found to be high (0.97 and 0.99, respectively). This severity scale provides a valuable, validated research tool for the investigation of facial fracture severity across patient populations, allowing for systematic evaluation of facial fracture outcomes, cost-benefit analysis, and objective analysis of the effect of specific interventions.

Which outcome measure is the best? Evaluating responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale following hand and wrist surgery.

The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist pain, finger contracture, or tumor. Eighty-one subjects prospectively completed each questionnaire shortly before and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests. Responsiveness to clinical change was calculated using standardized response means. The DASH was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (0.77), wrist pain (0.61), and tumor (0.55); the MHQ was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (1.04), wrist pain (0.87), and finger contracture (0.62); and the PSFS was responsive for those with carpal tunnel syndrome (0.65) and finger contracture (0.64). The interval during which the highest responsiveness occurred for the carpal tunnel, wrist pain, and finger contracture groups was the preoperative to 6-month period. The tumor group experienced the highest responsiveness during the preoperative to 3-month period. Our results indicate that one or more of the instruments evaluated are suitable for outcomes research related to surgery to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist pain, finger contracture, and tumor.

Patient-reported donor-site morbidity following anterolateral thigh free flaps.

This study evaluated donor-site morbidity (retrospective chart review and followup questionnaire) in patients following reconstruction using an anterolateral thigh free flap. Twenty-one flaps were performed in 20 consecutive patients (mean age: 45.0 +/- 3.8 years). Primary wound closure was obtained in 52.4 percent. The perforators were intramuscular in 68 percent and septocutaneous in 32 percent. The early complications included infection (n = 2), wound dehiscence (n = 2), delayed healing (n = 8), and seroma (n = 1). Wound healing took 4.5 +/- 0.7 weeks, and leg weakness resolved completely (n = 13) by 6.6 +/- 2.0 weeks. More chronic complications (n = 19) included weakness (n = 5), pain/tightness (n = 6), contour deformity (n = 14), muscle herniation (n = 6), and unsatisfactory scar appearance (n = 6). No statistically significant differences existed in aesthetics or healing between wound-closure groups, nor in pain or weakness between perforator groups. Pain and weakness were significantly related to sacrifice of the deep fascia from the thigh through its elevation in the flap.