ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Early medical examinations performed in 2-, 4-, 9-, and 24-month-olds need to set up a technique adapted to infants and children. The aim of this study was to describe the technique and the results of screening performed by physicians of the Hauts-de-Seine district in 2004. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over 1 year, 17 participating centers of the Maternal and Infant Welfare department of the Hauts-de-Seine district (France) included 1366 children at the 9- and 24-month medical consultation. This standardized procedure looked for personal and family risk factors and sought to detect ocular anomalies, strabismus, and amblyopia. Depending on the results, the patient was oriented toward appropriate care. RESULTS: At inclusion, only 10% of the children had already consulted an ophthalmologist with insufficient numbers in the risk groups although the difference between groups was significant. Of the children included, 30.2% had a family history of visual impairment and 7% a personal risk. During the examination, a risk of visual impairment was suspected for 12.5% of the children. At the end of the consultation, 39.7% of the children were oriented to an ophthalmic consultation, with the history or the results of the examination. One of these children out of two underwent a consultation. Finally, 31 children were prescribed corrective glasses compared to only eight wearing glasses initially and 65 children were followed up as opposed to only seven children before the study. CONCLUSION: This screening has led to quadrupling the number of children wearing corrective lenses and monitoring the others presenting visual abnormalities, confirming the advantages of early visual screening for children under 3 years of age.
Subject(s)
Amblyopia/epidemiology , Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/statistics & numerical data , Early Diagnosis , Mass Screening , Strabismus/epidemiology , Amblyopia/etiology , Amblyopia/prevention & control , Child, Preschool , Eyeglasses/statistics & numerical data , Female , France/epidemiology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Premature, Diseases/diagnosis , Infant, Premature, Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Program Evaluation , Risk Factors , Strabismus/complications , Strabismus/diagnosis , Strabismus/genetics , Strabismus/therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prevalence of visual impairment is estimated at 15% at the age of 5 years. Early visual screening is essential to prevent the risk of amblyopia and treat strabismus. The Maternal and Infant Welfare department of the Hauts-de-Seine district (France) organized a systematic visual screening during a routine health check-up in 3- to 4-year-old preschool children. In this population, 4% of children were wearing corrected lenses before check-up and 12% of children were referred to an ophthalmic consultant. The aim of this study was to document the performance and limitations of two visual acuity measurement tests: the Stycar test (separated presentation of letters) and Cadet letters test (grouped presentation). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve physicians conducting check-ups in 56 of the department's preschools constituted two random samples of representative children. The first sample of 201 children included 3- to 4-year-olds with a positive visual screening on the Cadet or Stycar test and the results and recommendations were collected. The second sample included 238 children who had a first negative visual screening at 3-4 years old with the Stycar test. We then conducted a second visual screening at 4-5 years-old with the Cadet letters test and collected results. RESULTS: In the first sample of 201 children, 73 were lost to follow-up, 40 had a normal documented ophthalmic examination, 63 needed glasses and 25 needed follow-up. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the Stycar test was much higher than the PPV of the Cadet test (79% versus 48%, p<10-4). After this first screening, prevalence of visual impairment at 3-4 years old was estimated at 8%. In the second sample of 238 children, four children were recently lens adapted and 36 were referred to an ophthalmic consultant. Of these 36 children, 11 were lost to follow-up (of these children, two had a very low visual acuity (2/10 and 3/10), four had a normal ophthalmic examination, 13 needed glasses, and eight needed a follow-up. Of the total sample, 10.5% of the children had a documented visual insufficiency on the primary Stycar test screening. The PPV of the Cadet letters test was 84% (IC95%[70%; 98%]). Results of the Cadet letters test was independent of the delay between the two tests. CONCLUSION: Although one-third of the children did not follow the recommendations for follow-up consultation, we demonstrate that visual acuity evaluation was insufficient at 3-4 years of age, and the problems were caught at 4-5 years of age with the Cadet test. Physicians must be aware of the difficulty of the Cadet test at 3-4 years of age but also that screening is inadequate when the Stycar test is normal. A second visual screening, taking into account separating problems on the Cadet test is justified at 4-5 years of age The Stycar test must be discontinued after 4-5 years of age when compliance and the predictive value of the Cadet letters test become excellent.
