Speed of recovery and side-effect profile of sevoflurane sedation compared with midazolam.

BACKGROUND: Sedation for surgical procedures performed with regional or local anesthesia has usually been achieved with intravenous medications, whereas the use of volatile anesthetics has been limited. The use of sevoflurane for sedation has been suggested because of its characteristics of nonpungency, rapid induction, and quick elimination. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality, recovery, and side effects of sevoflurane sedation compared with midazolam. METHODS: One hundred seventy-three patients undergoing surgery with local or regional anesthesia were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, randomized investigation comparing sedation with sevoflurane versus midazolam. Sedation level was titrated to an Observer's Assessment of Alertness--Sedation score of 3 (responds slowly to voice). Recovery was assessed objectively by Observer's Assessment of Alertness--Sedation, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and memory scores, and subjectively by visual analog scales. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the sevoflurane group had to be converted to general anesthesia because of excessive movement (18 sevoflurane and 2 midazolam; P = 0.043). Of remaining patients, 141 were assessable for efficacy and recovery data (93 sevoflurane and 48 midazolam). Sevoflurane and midazolam produced dose-related sedation. Sevoflurane patients had higher DSST and memory scores during recovery. Seventy-six percent (sevoflurane) compared with 35% (midazolam) returned to baseline DSST at 30 min postoperatively (P < 0.05). More frequent excitement-disinhibition was observed with sevoflurane (15 [16%] vs. midazolam; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane for sedation produces faster recovery of cognitive function as measured by DSST and memory scores compared with midazolam. However, sevoflurane for sedation is complicated by a high incidence of intraoperative excitement.

Opioid antagonist adjuncts to epidural morphine for postcesarean analgesia: maternal outcomes.

This prospective, randomized, controlled investigation compared the effects of three prophylactic mu-opioid antagonists, epidural butorphanol (BU) 3 mg, epidural nalbuphine (NB) 10 mg, and oral naltrexone (NX) 6 mg, on postcesarean epidural morphine analgesia. After randomization, 102 term parturients underwent cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia, 2% lidocaine and epinephrine 1:200,000. When the umbilical cord was clamped, each patient received one epidural solution (containing morphine 4 mg plus either saline or treatment drug), and one oral capsule (containing either placebo or treatment drug) in a double-blind manner. Maternal outcomes included pain and satisfaction [assessed with 100-mm visual analog scales (VAS)], and the incidence and severity of respiratory depression, somnolence, pruritus, nausea, and emesis. Through the first 12 h postpartum, the BU group achieved significantly greater analgesia than the morphine sulfate (control) (MS), NB, and NX groups, a significantly lower incidence of severe pruritus than the MS group, and significantly greater satisfaction than MS and NX groups. Epidural morphine and BU promoted better analgesia and satisfaction than any previously documented postcesarean regimen.

Assessing the behavioral effects and abuse potential of propofol bolus injections in healthy volunteers.

Propofol is a recently introduced intravenous anesthetic agent, commonly administered to surgical patients because it induces anesthesia smoothly (i.e., provides loss of consciousness rapidly and usually with no complications) and is associated with rapid recovery. Propofol has psychoactive effects that could be construed as pleasant, although little abuse liability testing has been done on this agent in humans. Accordingly, we examined various effects of this agent at different subanesthetic doses (0.2-0.6 mg/kg) in order to characterize this drug's abuse potential (for recreational use or potential for diversion). Using a double-blind, randomized, crossover design, healthy normal volunteers (N = 10) were injected intravenously with the drug or with placebo. Before the injection and for up to 1 h afterwards, mood (including drug liking), memory and psychomotor performance were assessed. Propofol impaired memory and psychomotor performance and produced changes in 10 of 20 VAS mood ratings. Although there was variability in self-reported drug liking, some subjects clearly liked the effects of propofol, especially at the two higher doses. At the debriefing interview held after completion of the study, five subjects said if they had to participate in one more session in which they were given a choice between being injected with the highest dose (0.6 mg/kg) or a placebo, they would choose propofol. These preliminary results suggest that this agent may have some potential for abuse/diversion and perhaps stricter accountability procedures should be established for this drug in settings where general anesthesia or conscious sedation procedures are done.

Subjective, behavioral and physiological responses to intravenous meperidine in healthy volunteers.

Meperidine is a mu opiate agonist that is frequently used to treat pain. We examined in healthy volunteers (N = 10) the effects of intravenous meperidine (0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg) on mood and psychomotor performance. A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design was used in which subjects were injected with meperidine or saline in a double-blind fashion. Subjects completed several subjective effects questionnaires commonly used in abuse liability testing studies before drug injection and at periodic intervals for up to 5 h after drug injection. Subjects also completed several psychomotor tests. Meperidine produced a constellation of subjective effects in a dose-related fashion, including increases in ratings of "sedated," "coasting or spaced out" and "feel drug effect" ratings. Many of the drug's subjective effects persisted up to 4 or 5 h after administration of the 1.0 mg/kg dose. Drug liking ratings assessed on a visual analog scale were increased after meperidine injection in about half of the subjects (P = 0.09). Eye-hand coordination was affected slightly by meperidine but other indices of psychomotor functioning were unaffected. Miosis increased in a dose-related fashion. Other physiological parameters, such as vital signs, were not affected by meperidine. We conclude that meperidine in healthy volunteers has robust and long-lasting effects on mood, but may have weaker effects on psychomotor performance.

Effects of charge on membrane processing in the proximal nephron.

To examine the effects of molecular charge on membrane processing in renal tubular cells, the distribution of cationic and anionic ferritin was characterized in microperfused proximal nephron segments. During the first 7 min of proximal tubule perfusion, cationic ferritin was observed 1) bound to the brush-border membrane, 2) in apically positioned vesicles and vacuoles, 3) in lysosomes, 4) in vesicles adjacent to the basolateral plasmalemma, and 5) bound to the basolateral plasmalemma. Compared with anionic ferritin, the distribution of cationic ferritin was characterized by 1) a smaller relative grain density for lysosomes, 2) an accumulation of granules in an enlarged pool of apical cytoplasmic vesicles and vacuoles, and 3) a greater number of granules reaching the basolateral plasmalemma. During incubation directly in the presence of isolated renal cortical microvilli, binding of cationic ferritin increased significantly as pH was lowered from 8.0 to 4.5 and was greater than that of anionic ferritin, which varied little with pH. The data indicate that the molecular charge of endocytosed substances affects routing and membrane processing in proximal tubular cells, suggesting that their membrane-binding characteristics may influence transport patterns.