Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 73
Filter
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(1): 1-9, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32422311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and economic costs. Many BSIs are associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). The Infection in Critical Care Quality Improvement Programme (ICCQIP) was established to initiate surveillance of BSIs in English ICUs. METHODS: A web-based data capture system was launched on 1st May 2016 to collect all positive blood cultures (PBCs), patient-days and CVC-days. National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England were invited to participate in the surveillance programme. Data were linked to the antimicrobial resistance dataset maintained by Public Health England and to mortality data. FINDINGS: Between 1st May 2016 and 30th April 2017, 84 ICUs (72 adult ICUs, seven paediatric ICUs and five neonatal ICUs) based in 57 of 147 NHS trusts provided data. In total, 1474 PBCs were reported, with coagulase-negative staphylococci, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium being the most commonly reported organisms. The rates of BSI and ICU-associated CVC-BSI were 5.7, 1.5 and 1.3 per 1000 bed-days and 2.3, 1.0 and 1.5 per 1000 ICU-CVC-days in adult, paediatric and neonatal ICUs, respectively. There was wide variation in BSI and CVC-BSI rates within ICU types, particularly in adult ICUs (0-44.0 per 1000 bed-days and 0-18.3 per 1000 ICU-CVC-days). CONCLUSIONS: While the overall rates of ICU-associated CVC-BSIs were lower than 2.5 per 1000 ICU-CVC-days across all age ranges, large differences were observed between ICUs, highlighting the importance of a national standardized surveillance system to identify opportunities for improvement. Data linkage provided clinically important information on resistance patterns and patient outcomes at no extra cost to participating trusts.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Sentinel Surveillance , Sepsis/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross Infection , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , England/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pilot Projects , Sepsis/mortality , State Medicine , Young Adult
2.
Anaesthesia ; 74(4): 468-472, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30604863

ABSTRACT

Higher mortality following admission to hospital at the weekend has been reported for several conditions. It is unclear whether this variation is due to differences in patients or their care. Status epilepticus mandates hospital admission and usually critical care: its study might provide new insights into the nature of any weekend effect. We studied 20,922 adults admitted to UK critical care with status epilepticus from 2010 to 2015. We used multiple logistic regression to evaluate the association between weekend admission and in-hospital mortality, comparing university hospitals with other hospitals. There were 2462 in-hospital deaths (12%). There was no difference in mortality after weekend admission to university hospitals, adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) 0.99 (0.84-1.16), p = 0.89. Mortality was less after weekend admission than after admissions Monday to Friday in hospitals not associated with a university, adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) 0.74 (0.64-0.87), p = 0.0001. There is no evidence that adults admitted to UK critical care at the weekend in status epilepticus are more likely to die than similar patients admitted during the week.


Subject(s)
Status Epilepticus/mortality , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission , Time Factors
4.
Intensive Care Med ; 40(2): 202-210, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24306080

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Faecal peritonitis (FP) is a common cause of sepsis and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). The Genetics of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Europe (GenOSept) project is investigating the influence of genetic variation on the host response and outcomes in a large cohort of patients with sepsis admitted to ICUs across Europe. Here we report an epidemiological survey of the subset of patients with FP. OBJECTIVES: To define the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for mortality in patients with FP admitted to ICUs across Europe. METHODS: Data was extracted from electronic case report forms. Phenotypic data was recorded using a detailed, quality-assured clinical database. The primary outcome measure was 6-month mortality. Patients were followed for 6 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine mortality rates. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was employed to identify independent risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: Data for 977 FP patients admitted to 102 centres across 16 countries between 29 September 2005 and 5 January 2011 was extracted. The median age was 69.2 years (IQR 58.3-77.1), with a male preponderance (54.3%). The most common causes of FP were perforated diverticular disease (32.1%) and surgical anastomotic breakdown (31.1%). The ICU mortality rate at 28 days was 19.1%, increasing to 31.6% at 6 months. The cause of FP, pre-existing co-morbidities and time from estimated onset of symptoms to surgery did not impact on survival. The strongest independent risk factors associated with an increased rate of death at 6 months included age, higher APACHE II score, acute renal and cardiovascular dysfunction within 1 week of admission to ICU, hypothermia, lower haematocrit and bradycardia on day 1 of ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients admitted to European ICUs with FP the 6 month mortality was 31.6%. The most consistent predictors of mortality across all time points were increased age, development of acute renal dysfunction during the first week of admission, lower haematocrit and hypothermia on day 1 of ICU admission.


Subject(s)
Feces , Peritonitis/mortality , Aged , Europe , Female , Health Surveys , Hospitalization , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Peritonitis/epidemiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
6.
Resuscitation ; 83(7): 894-9, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22285723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 1995, the University of Birmingham, UK, School of Medicine and Dentistry replaced lecture-based basic life support (BLS) teaching with a peer-led, practical programme. We present our 15-yr experience of peer-led healthcare undergraduate training and examination with a literature review. METHODS: A literature review of healthcare undergraduate peer-led practical skills teaching was performed though Pubmed. The development of the Birmingham course is described, from its inception in 1995-2011. Training methods include peer-led training and assessment by senior students who complete an European Resuscitation Council-endorsed instructor course. Student assessors additionally undergo training in assessment and communication skills. The course has been developed by parallel research evaluation and peer-reviewed publication. Course administration is by an experienced student committee with senior clinician support. Anonymous feedback from the most recent courses and the current annual pass rates are reported. RESULTS: The literature review identified 369 publications of which 28 met our criteria for inclusion. Largely descriptive, these are highly positive about peer involvement in practical skills teaching using similar, albeit smaller, courses to that described below. Currently approximately 600 first year healthcare undergraduates complete the Birmingham course; participant numbers increase annually. Successful completion is mandatory for students to proceed to the second year of studies. First attempt pass rate is 86%, and close to 100% (565/566 students, 99.8%) following re-assessment the same day. 97% of participants enjoyed the course, 99% preferred peer-tutors to clinicians, 99% perceived teaching quality as "good" or "excellent", and felt they had sufficient practice. Course organisation was rated "good" or "excellent" by 91%. Each year 3-4 student projects have been published or presented internationally. The annual cost of providing the course is currently £15,594.70 (Eur 18,410), or approximately £26 (Eur 30) per student. CONCLUSIONS: This large scale, peer-led BLS course demonstrates that such programmes can have excellent outcomes with outstanding participant satisfaction. Peer-tutors and assessors are competent, more available and less costly than clinical staff. Student instructors develop skills in teaching, assessment and appraisal, organisation and research. Sustainability is possible given succession-planning and consistent leadership.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Life Support Care , Humans , Learning , Peer Group
8.
J Hosp Infect ; 78(4): 302-7, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21481491

ABSTRACT

West Midlands was particularly affected by the 2009 H1N1 influenza A (pH1N1) pandemic. Vaccination of frontline healthcare professionals (HCPs) aimed to prevent spread to vulnerable patients, minimise service disruption and protect staff. HCPs involved in upper airway management are particularly at risk of aerosol exposure. We assessed the attitudes of these HCPs towards pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccination uptake: primary reasons for acceptance, barriers to vaccination, and knowledge surrounding pH1N1 influenza. We performed a voluntary, anonymous questionnaire survey based in two West Midlands National Health Service Trusts, one month after introduction of the vaccine. In all, 187 useable responses were received (60.5% response rate); 43.8% (N=82) had/intended to receive vaccination. Concern over long term side-effects was the main deterrent (37.4%, N=70). Primary reasons for potentially accepting vaccination were: to protect themselves (36.9%, N=69), to protect family (35.3%, N=66), and to protect patients (10.2%, N=19). Of responders, 76.5% were unsure that the vaccines had undergone suitably rigorous clinical trials to ensure safety; 20.9% correctly identified reported vaccine efficacy. We conclude that pH1N1 vaccination uptake among high risk HCPs remained low, although twice that of peak seasonal influenza vaccination rates. HCPs' knowledge of vaccine efficacy is poor. Barriers to vaccination include concerns over safety profile given the short chronological time-span between the pandemic being declared and vaccine introduction. Side-effects, both acute and chronic, are a significant barrier to vaccination. Further reassurance/education surrounding vaccine safety/efficacy at the time of any future pandemic may improve uptake rates.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care , Cross Infection/transmission , Cross Infection/virology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Hospitals , Humans , Influenza, Human/transmission , Influenza, Human/virology , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Br J Anaesth ; 105(1): 26-33, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20511333

ABSTRACT

Unreliable delivery of best practice care is a major component of medical error. Critically ill patients are particularly susceptible to error and unreliable care. Human factors analysis, widely used in industry, provides insights into how interactions between organizations, tasks, and the individual worker impact on human behaviour and affect systems reliability. We adopt a human factors approach to examine determinants of clinical reliability in the management of critically ill patients. We conducted a narrative review based on a Medline search (1950-March 2010) combining intensive/critical care (units) with medical errors, patient safety, or delivery of healthcare; keyword and Internet search 'human factors' or 'ergonomics'. Critical illness represents a high-risk, complex system spanning speciality and geographical boundaries. Substantial opportunities exist for improving the safety and reliability of care of critically ill patients at the level of the task, the individual healthcare provider, and the organization or system. Task standardization (best practice guidelines) and simplification (bundling or checklists) should be implemented where scientific evidence is strong, or adopted subject to further research ('dynamic standardization'). Technical interventions should be embedded in everyday practice by the adjunctive use of non-technical (behavioural) interventions. These include executive 'adoption' of clinical areas, systematic methods for identifying hazards and reflective learning from error, and a range of techniques for improving teamworking and communication. Human factors analysis provides a useful framework for understanding and rectifying the causes of error and unreliability, particularly in complex systems such as critical care.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Illness/therapy , Critical Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Ergonomics/methods , Humans , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Health Care
10.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 75(3): 117-24, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19037192

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the Competency-Based Training in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe (CoBaTrICE) project is to create an internationally acceptable competency-based training program for specialists in intensive care medicine. The CoBaTrICE Project has performed a survey, in collaboration with the Picker institute, United Kingdom, to identify desirable characteristics of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) specialists, as expressed by patients and their relatives. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed to assess 21 elements of professional competence. Each element was assigned to one of four categories of a Likert scale: 1=essential; 2=very important; 3=not too important; 4=does not matter. The results were dichotomized into essential (score: 1) and not essential (scores: 2-4) categories. Further, the documents were related to three key concepts: "medical skills and competencies", "communication with patients", and "communication with relatives". Questionnaire statements grouped by theme were also ranked for each item using a number: 1=highest rank; 21=lowest rank. Free text responses were also invited. RESULTS: Ten Italian ICUS were enrolled in the study. There were 249 questionnaires completed (18% total return rate). CONCLUSION: Priority in Italy was given to medical skills and competence. Involvement of patients and relatives in decision-making processes were among the items considered least important. Italian families preferred a paternalist approach to the end of life decision-making process.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Critical Care/psychology , Education, Medical , Family/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Patients/psychology , Specialization , Data Collection , Decision Making , Hospitals, Community , Hospitals, University , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Italy , Paternalism , Patient Participation , Personal Autonomy , Physician-Patient Relations , Professional-Family Relations , Surveys and Questionnaires , Terminal Care/psychology , Truth Disclosure
11.
J Hosp Infect ; 71(2): 117-22, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19013680

ABSTRACT

Patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) are at increased risk of bloodstream infections and sepsis-related death. CVC-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are costly and account for a significant proportion of hospital-acquired infections. The aim of this audit was to assess current practice and staff knowledge of CVC post-insertion care and therefore identify aspects of CVC care with potential for improvement. We conducted a prospective audit over 28 consecutive days at a university teaching hospital investigating current practice of CVC post-insertion care in wards with high CVC usage. A multiple choice questionnaire on best practice of CVC insertion and care was distributed among clinical staff. Rates of breaches in catheter care and CRBSIs were calculated and statistical significance assumed when P<0.05. Data was recorded from 151 CVCs in 106 patients giving a total of 721 catheter days. In all, 323 breaches in care were identified giving a failure rate of 44.8%, with significant differences between intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU wards (P<0.001). Dressings (not intact) and caps and taps (incorrectly placed) were identified as the major lapses in CVC care with 158 and 156 breaches per 1000 catheter days, respectively. During the study period four CRBSIs were identified, producing a CRBSI rate of 5.5 per 1000 catheter days (95% confidence interval: 0.12-10.97). There are several opportunities to improve CVC post-insertion care. Future interventions to improve reliability of care should focus on implementing best practice rather than further education.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Clinical Competence , Guideline Adherence , Infection Control/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Catheters, Indwelling/microbiology , Cross Infection/etiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Female , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control , Infection Control/standards , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Young Adult
12.
Eur Respir J ; 29(5): 1033-56, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17470624

ABSTRACT

Weaning covers the entire process of liberating the patient from mechanical support and from the endotracheal tube. Many controversial questions remain concerning the best methods for conducting this process. An International Consensus Conference was held in April 2005 to provide recommendations regarding the management of this process. An 11-member international jury answered five pre-defined questions. 1) What is known about the epidemiology of weaning problems? 2) What is the pathophysiology of weaning failure? 3) What is the usual process of initial weaning from the ventilator? 4) Is there a role for different ventilator modes in more difficult weaning? 5) How should patients with prolonged weaning failure be managed? The main recommendations were as follows. 1) Patients should be categorised into three groups based on the difficulty and duration of the weaning process. 2) Weaning should be considered as early as possible. 3) A spontaneous breathing trial is the major diagnostic test to determine whether patients can be successfully extubated. 4) The initial trial should last 30 min and consist of either T-tube breathing or low levels of pressure support. 5) Pressure support or assist-control ventilation modes should be favoured in patients failing an initial trial/trials. 6) Noninvasive ventilation techniques should be considered in selected patients to shorten the duration of intubation but should not be routinely used as a tool for extubation failure.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Ventilator Weaning/methods , Humans , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Treatment Failure , Work of Breathing
13.
Intensive Care Med ; 32(9): 1371-83, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16841214

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define the core (minimum) competencies required of a specialist in adult intensive care medicine (ICM). This is the second phase of a 3-year project to develop an internationally acceptable competency-based training programme in ICM for Europe (CoBaTrICE). METHODOLOGY: Consensus techniques (modified Delphi and nominal group) were used to enable interested stakeholders (health care professionals, educators, patients and their relatives) to identify and prioritise core competencies. Online and postal surveys were used to generate ideas. A nominal group of 12 clinicians met in plenary session to rate the importance of the competence statements constructed from these suggestions. All materials were presented online for a second round Delphi prior to iterative editorial review. RESULTS: The initial surveys generated over 5,250 suggestions for competencies from 57 countries. Preliminary editing permitted us to encapsulate these suggestions within 164 competence stems and 5 behavioural themes. For each of these items the nominal group selected the minimum level of expertise required of a safe practitioner at the end of their specialist training, before rating them for importance. Individuals and groups from 29 countries commented on the nominal group output; this informed the editorial review. These combined processes resulted in 102 competence statements, divided into 12 domains. CONCLUSION: Using consensus techniques we have generated core competencies which are internationally applicable but still able to accommodate local requirements. This provides the foundation upon which an international competency based training programme for intensive care medicine can be built.


Subject(s)
Competency-Based Education , Critical Care , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Education, Medical , Internationality , Specialization , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Delphi Technique , Europe , Humans
15.
Intensive Care Med ; 31(4): 553-61, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15750798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this international survey of training in adult intensive care medicine (ICM) was to characterise current structures, processes, and outcomes to determine the potential for convergence to a common competency-based training programme across national borders. This survey is the first phase of a 3 year project which will use consensus methods to build an international competency-based training programme in ICM in Europe (CoBaTrICE). METHODOLOGY: A survey by questionnaire, e-mail, and direct discussion was undertaken with national ICM representatives from seven geographical regions. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 41 countries (countries which share common training programmes were grouped together; n=38). Fifty-four different training programmes were identified, 37 within the European region; three (6%) were competency-based. Twenty (53%) permitted multidisciplinary access to a common training programme; in nine (24%) training was only available within anaesthesia. The minimum duration of ICM training required for recognition as a specialist varied from 3 months to 72 months (mode 24 months). The content of most (75%) ICM programmes was standardised nationally. Work-based assessment of competence was formally documented in nineteen (50%) countries. An exam was mandatory in twenty-nine (76%). CONCLUSION: There are considerable variations in the structures and processes of ICM training worldwide. However, as competency-based training is an outcome strategy rather than a didactic process, these differences should not impede the development of a common international competency-based training programme in ICM.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Data Collection , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Internationality , Problem-Based Learning/organization & administration , Adult , Developed Countries , Humans , Models, Educational , Professional Competence , Specialization
17.
Lancet ; 363(9413): 970-7, 2004 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15043966

ABSTRACT

Health care providers, hospital administrators, and politicians face competing challenges to reduce clinical errors, control expenditure, increase access and throughput, and improve quality of care. The safe management of the acutely ill inpatient presents particular difficulties. In the first of five Lancet articles on this topic we discuss patients' safety in the acute hospital. We also present a framework in which responsibility for improvement and better integration of care can be considered at the level of patient, local environment, hospital, and health care system; and the other four papers in the series will examine in greater detail methods for measuring, monitoring, and improving inpatient safety.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/standards , Critical Care/standards , Critical Illness/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medical Errors/classification , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Safety Management/methods , Safety Management/organization & administration , Safety Management/standards
19.
J Hosp Infect ; 50(2): 110-4, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11846537

ABSTRACT

Multiple-antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii, including meropenem resistance, was first isolated from a patient in the general intensive care unit of a tertiary-referral university teaching hospital in Birmingham in December 1998. Similar strains were subsequently isolated from 12 other patients, including those on another intensive care unit within the hospital. The outbreak followed an increase in the use of meropenem in both the units. Environmental screening revealed the presence of the multiple-resistant Acinetobacter species on fomite surfaces in the intensive care unit and bed linen. The major source appeared to be the curtains surrounding patients' beds. Typing by pulsed field gel electrophoresis demonstrated that the patients' isolates and those from the environment were indistinguishable. Rigorous infection control measures including increased frequency of cleaning of the environment with hypochlorite (1000 ppm) and twice-weekly changing of curtains were implemented, along with restriction of meropenem use in the units. Isolation of the multiple-resistant Acinetobacter spp. subsequently diminished and it was not detected over a follow-up period of 18 months. To our knowledge, this is the first reported outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. from the UK. This outbreak also highlights environmental sources, particularly dry fabrics such as curtains, as an important reservoir for dissemination of acinetobacters.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/epidemiology , Acinetobacter/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Intensive Care Units , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , Middle Aged , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...