[5 days Cefaclor vs. 10 days amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of childhood streptococcal pharyngitis. Data from a randomized clinical trial]. / Efficacia di Cefaclor 5 giorni vs. amoxicillina-acido clavulanico 10 giorni, nella terapia della faringotonsillite streptococcia del bambino. Risultati di uno studio clinico randomizzato.

AIM: The duration of therapy represents a fundamental aspect in the compliance to the therapy of child pathologies, such as pharyngotonsillitis, treated with oral therapy. Although penicillin and amoxicillin are the first choice antibiotics in the case of a child suffering from pharyngotonsillitis with the proven presence of Group A ß-hemolytic Streptococcus (GAS), the number of orally administered doses and 10 days of therapy, considerably lower the compliance. METHODS: An open phase IV randomized multicenter clinical trial was conducted in parallel groups, involving 49 family pediatrician (FP), distributed over the entire national territory, enrolling 435 children suffering from GAS-FT. 210 children received Cefaclor, 50 mg/kg/day, administered twice daily for five days, whilst 213 children received amoxicillin/clavulanate 40 mg/kg/day administered twice daily for 10 days. RESULTS: The results showed percentages of eradication of 88.4% for the Cefaclor group and 94.3% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group, and a positive clinical judgement of 92.3% for the Cefaclor group and 96.6% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group. The two arms of the study did not have any significant statistical differences, neither for the eradication, nor for the clinical judgement nor for the reduction of the Milano Score between the beginning and the end of treatment, with a P=0.042 for amoxicillin/clavulanate for eradication. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the administration of Cefaclor for five days during GAS-FT has the same efficacy as a 10-day therapy with amoxicillin/clavulanate, with a clearly different compliance.

Time-dependent changes in orally exhaled nitric oxide and pulmonary functions induced by inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels are elevated in asthmatic children and decrease after inhaled steroid treatment. We evaluated the time-dependent changes in fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration (FENO) and pulmonary function parameters following inhaled steroid therapy. Thirty-nine steroid-naive atopic patients (age 11.92+/-0.48 years) with mild intermittent asthma and 22 age-matched healthy controls were enrolled in the study; pulmonary functions and FE(NO) levels were measured. Low doses of inhaled steroids were prescribed to all asthmatic patients who were reevaluated in a second visit (between 10 and 40 days after the beginning of the treatment). At the enrolment, asthmatic patients had similar forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) values (p > 0.05) but reduced forced expiratory flows at 25-75% of the vital capacity (FEF(25-75%)) values, as compared to controls (p < 0.05). In addition, FE(NO) levels were significantly higher in asthmatics with respect to control subjects (30.8+/-3.0 and 4.0+/-0.5 ppb, respectively; p < 0.01). All asthmatics had FE(NO) levels higher than 8.8 ppb (i.e., > 2 standard deviations of the mean in controls). After steroid treatment, patients showed significant improvement of FEV1, FVC, and FEF(25-75%) (p = 0.0001; each comparison) and a reduction of FE(NO) levels (p = 0.0001). A weak significant correlation was found between percent decrease in FE(NO) levels and percent increase in FEV1 (r = 0.33, p = 0.04) or in FEF(25-75%) (r = 0.4, p = 0.01) after treatment. When changes in FE(NO) levels and in pulmonary function parameters were corrected for days of treatment, significant correlations were still present between percent decrease in FE(NO) levels and percent increase in FEV1 (r = 0.57, p = 0.0004) or percent increase in FEF(25-75%) (r = 0.45, p = 0.006). Sixteen of the 39 asthmatic patients were evaluated on two occasions after the beginning of treatment, at days 10 and 40. The significant reduction in FE(NO) levels (p < 0.01) and the significant increase in FEV1 and FEF(25-75%) values observed (p < 0.05) after 10 days did not further improve at day 40. These data show that it is possible to demonstrate early effects of low-dose inhaled steroids in asthmatic children using objective measurements of airway caliber and inflammation.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels in non-allergic and allergic mono- or polysensitised children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Increased fractional exhaled NO concentrations (FENO) and blood/tissue eosinophilia are frequently reported in allergic children with mild asthma and are thought to reflect the intensity of the inflammation characterising the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate possible differences in FENO levels or in the intensity of the blood eosinophilia in allergic and non-allergic asthmatic children. METHODS: 112 children with stable, mild, intermittent asthma with a positive bronchial challenge to methacholine were consecutively enrolled in the study; 56 were skin prick test and RAST negative (non-sensitised) while 56 were sensitised to house dust mites (23 only to house dust mites (monosensitised) and 33 were sensitised to mites and at least another class of allergens (pollens, pet danders, or moulds)). Nineteen sex and age matched healthy children formed a control group. RESULTS: Compared with non-allergic patients, allergic children had a significantly higher rate of blood eosinophilia (p=0.0001) with no differences between mono- and polysensitised individuals. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of vital capacity (FEF(25-75%)), and the degree of bronchial reactivity to methacholine were similar in non-atopic and atopic children, with no differences between mono- and polysensitised individuals. FENO levels measured by chemiluminescence analyser were higher in asthmatic children (15.9 (14.3) ppb) than in the control group (7.6 (1.6) ppb, p=0.04) and higher in allergic patients (23.9 (2.1) ppb) than in non-allergic patients (7.9 (0.8) ppb, p=0.0001), but there were no differences between mono- and polysensitised individuals (p>0.1). Significant correlations between blood eosinophilia and FENO levels were seen only in allergic (r=0.35, p<0.01) and in polysensitised individuals (r=0.45, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In children with mild asthma, a similar degree of functional disease severity may be associated with a higher inflammatory component in allergic than in non-allergic subjects.