The diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture: our 19-year experience.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate our approach to the diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the results of 107 patients with penile fracture treated in our clinic between January 1990 and January 2009. Patient age, etiology of each fracture, history, physical examination results, radiologic findings, type of treatment, and postoperative complications were recorded. In 5 cases cavernosography was performed and in 8 cases retrograde urethrography. RESULTS: The most common etiologies of penile fracture were coitus and manually bending the penis for detumescence. Diagnoses were made based on history and physical examination in 102 patients and cavernosography in 5 patients. In order to evaluate urethral injury in 8 cases, retrograde urethrography was performed. Rupture was repaired surgically in 101 patients, but 6 patients were treated conservatively. Among the 6 conservatively treated patients, 3 developed penile curvature 6 months post-treatment; no complications occurred in the surgically treated patients. CONCLUSION: Cavernosography should be performed only when history and physical examination are insufficient for diagnosis, and retrograde urethrography should be performed when urethral injury is suspected. In order to prevent the development of penile curvature and to ensure rapid recovery, early surgical repair is advised.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients: is computerized tomography a must?

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the results of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) cases, and discuss the results and necessity of non-contrast computerized tomography (CT) in these cases. In all, 48 pediatric patients who underwent PNL were retrospectively evaluated. Before PNL, either intravenous urography or CT was performed. In all patients, we evaluated the PNL time, scopy time with stone burden, and complications. During the PNL procedure, we switched to open surgery in two cases: in one because of renal pelvis perforation and in the other because of transcolonic access. In one patient who was scheduled to undergo PNL, we performed open surgery, primarily because we detected a retrorenal colon with CT. The stone burden in 45 patients who underwent PNL was 445 ± 225 mm(2), the PNL time was 51 ± 23 min, and the scopy time was 6.1 ± 2.7 min. We removed nephrostomy tubes 1-4 days after the procedure. In two patients, 24 h after removal of nephrostomy tubes, we inserted double J stents because of prolonged urine extravasation from the tract. In all, 34 of the 45 patients were stone-free, 5 patients had clinically insignificant stone fragments, and 6 patients had residual stones. PNL is a safe and effective method in the treatment of pediatric patients with kidney stones. Clinical experience is the most important factor in obtaining stone-free results. CT should be performed in all pediatric patients in order to prevent colon perforation.

Is procalcitonin valuable in the differential diagnosis of testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of procalcitonin (PCT) in the differential diagnosis of testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis. METHODS: This experimental study was performed in the research laboratory of Dicle University, School of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey between March and June 2008. The study included 24 male rats randomized equally in 3 groups: sham, epididymo-orchitis, and torsion groups. Blood samples were obtained from all rats at the beginning of the study. After torsion and infection occurred in the testes, new blood samples were obtained for PCT measurement. Then, all the right testes of the rats were excised for histopathological evaluation. The Wilcoxon signed test was used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Pre- and post PCT levels were statically compared, and PCT levels were significantly higher in the epididymo-orchitis group. CONCLUSION: Procalcitonin could be an easy, fast, and safe marker for use in the differential diagnosis of testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis.

Prevention of pain and infective complications after transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective study.

AIM: To investigate the effects of lidocaine gel and parenteral antibiotics and povidine lavage in the treatment of pain occurring during prostate biopsy in terms of infective complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with indications for prostate biopsy were randomized into two groups. One group underwent lavage with povidine iodine solution and lidocaine gel, and the other received cephtriaxon and lavage. Pain experienced by the patients was measured by visual analog scale (VAS). Blood samples were taken 15 and 60 min after the procedure, and urine culture antibiograms were taken 60 min after the procedure. RESULTS: The average pain score was 3.70 in Group 1 and 4.25 in Group 2; the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Likewise, no statistically significant difference between groups was found by the chi square test in either urine or blood cultures (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lavage with betadine prior to transrectal prostate biopsy is adequate in the prevention of infective complications; however, because lidocaine gel is not effective against pain, alternative methods for pain management need to be developed.