Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Endourol ; 22(6): 1389-93, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18498234

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Ureteral stenting plays a vital role in urology but still entails complications such as migration, encrustation, and blockage. We present our experience with a novel ureteral stent (Zebrastent) that had the complication of breakage which we explored by fatigue testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a device that can reproduce the movements of the Zebrastent in vitro (bending and cranio-caudal movements). We estimated the number of movements of the stent during 1 day and we thus calculated how much stress would result if it were in place for 9 months. RESULTS: We estimate that the stent will not break when in place up to 9 months in a kidney with average curvature. However, the stent broke when it was used in a kidney with a sharper-than-normal curvature. CONCLUSIONS: The Zebrastent may be a valuable addition to the armamentarium of the endourologist, provided that the appropriate size is selected.


Subject(s)
Materials Testing/methods , Stents/standards , Ureter , Body Height , Body Weight , Female , Humans , Male
2.
J Endourol ; 22(2): 389-92, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18095860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stents are used abundantly to maintain ureteral patency. The majority are plastic tubes that adjust easily to upper urinary-tract motion. Recently, a coiled-wire lumenless stent was introduced (ZebraStent, Neo Medical, Munich, Germany) to facilitate expulsion of stone fragments after lithotripsy. Its metal core is composed of Nitinol, with the soft J ends being of titanium. The thin shape considerably increases the extraluminal space. The ZebraStent stretches the ureter and also provides a surface for the fragments to glide along. In our 18-month experience with the ZebraStent, two of them fractured along the shaft. We sought to learn whether this complication resulted from a defect in stent design or from material fatigue secondary to constant movement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our model is powered by an electric motor that produces a constant displacement similar to stent movements in vivo. The whole ZebraStent is embedded in a 37 degrees C waterbath to simulate physiological conditions within the ureter. We used an average displacement of 16 mm. The average frequency of ventilatory-cycle simulation was 20 times that in vivo, allowing us to collect data in a shorter time. RESULTS: All 10 stents broke within the proximal Nitinol shaft at the equivalent of 4 to 6 months (125-179 days). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results show that all stents break after the equivalent of 4 or more months. The fact that this occurs in the homogenous proximal Nitinol shaft rather than at the welding point between the shaft and the titanium curl implies that breakage is secondary to material fatigue and not design error. Extensive testing is under way to confirm material fatigue as the cause of breakage. We hope to determine a safe dwelling time for these stents, which at the moment should not exceed 3 months.


Subject(s)
Alloys/analysis , Materials Testing/methods , Models, Anatomic , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Stents , Titanium/analysis , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Ureteral Obstruction/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Stress, Mechanical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...