ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to describe the scope and nature of research on the monitoring of clinical artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The review will identify the various methodologies used to monitor clinical AI, while also mapping the factors that influence the selection of monitoring approaches. INTRODUCTION: AI is being used in clinical decision-making at an increasing rate. While much attention has been directed toward the development and validation of AI for clinical applications, the practical implementation aspects, notably the establishment of rational monitoring/quality assurance systems, has received comparatively limited scientific interest. Given the scarcity of evidence and the heterogeneity of methodologies used in this domain, there is a compelling rationale for conducting a scoping review on this subject. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This scoping review will include any publications that describe systematic, continuous, or repeated initiatives that evaluate or predict clinical performance of AI models with direct implications for the management of patients in any segment of the health care system. METHODS: Publications will be identified through searches of the MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Scopus databases. Additionally, backward and forward citation searches, as well as a thorough investigation of gray literature, will be conducted. Title and abstract screening, full-text evaluation, and data extraction will be performed by 2 or more independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using a tool developed by the authors. The results will be presented graphically and narratively. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/afkrn.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Review Literature as Topic , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of prostate cancer in men attending evaluation for haematuria, as this could help healthcare providers to determine whether men with haematuria should have prostate examinations performed. METHODS: The study was performed according to a pre-specified protocol uploaded to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42022299383). A systematic search of MEDLINE, Ovid and Google Scholar was performed in December 2021. Two independent researchers evaluated all titles, available abstracts, and full texts. We included studies on adult men (aged ≥18 years) describing haematuria and prostate cancer. RESULTS: We screened 4252 titles and abstracts when available and assessed 350 studies in full text. In total, 65 studies were included and 42 was summarised in a meta-analysis. In total, 18 752 men with haematuria were included, and the pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of prostate cancer was 3.0% (2.0-4.1%). In men with macroscopic haematuria, the pooled prevalence (95% CI) of prostate cancer was 5.9% (2.9-9.9%; n = 265/5373). In men with microscopic haematuria, the pooled prevalence (95% CI) of prostate cancer was 1.4% (0.8-2.2%; n = 71/6642). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the prevalence of prostate cancer is considerable in men attending evaluation for haematuria. Therefore, digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen measurement should become a standard procedure for all men with haematuria, especially for men with macroscopic haematuria.
